Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/202,567

METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR CANNABINOID-BASED THERAPEUTICS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 26, 2023
Examiner
CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S
Art Unit
1625
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Ojai Energetics Pbc
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
1273 granted / 1752 resolved
+12.7% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
76 currently pending
Career history
1828
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
35.3%
-4.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1752 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 18202567 Election/Restrictions PNG media_image1.png 100 354 media_image1.png Greyscale cannabidiol Contrary to Applicants belief, claims 77, 78, 79, 80-85 do not read on the elected species. As such claims 73-76, 86-92 are examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 73-76, 86-92 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sanchez, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2020, Vol 574, 118916, 1-12 Available online 4 December 2019; FSanchez, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 2020, Vol 154, 246-258; Zohar, WO2020194237; Haghiralsadat, Cell Journal, Vol 19, Suppl 1, Spring 2017; Singh, Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, October 2010; 5(2): 65-77; US 8455477 and c US 8048888. Sanchez titled “CBD loaded microparticles as a potential formulation to improve paclitaxel and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in breast cancer'. At page 118916 column A, just above Materials and Methods Sanchez teaching is drawn to the activity of CBD (claim 73) in solution and encapsulated (claims 74, 86) in PLGA-microparticles, designed for parenteral administration, when combined with paclitaxel or doxorubicin (claim 75) in breast cancer cells in order to obtain a possible synergistic effect (claim 92), being a first in vitro approach to the advantages of including CBD formulations in standardised chemotherapy regimens. Sanchez discloses formulations for treating breast cancer comprising cannabidiol polymeric microparticles combined with anti-cancer agents such as paclitaxel (PTX) and doxorubicin (DOX) (see Abstract; pages 2, 2.2.3 and 2.4.2), wherein the formulation is administered to CAM tumor animal models (see pages 10, 3.5). FSanchez titled 'Enhancing ovarian cancer conventional chemotherapy through the combination with cannabidiol loaded microparticles' discloses combination therapies for ovarian cancer, comprising cannabinoid microparticles and anti-cancer drugs such as, paclitaxel, cisplatin, or doxorubicin administered to ovarian cancer cell lines (SKOV-3) (see Abstract; pages 249, 2.4.5 - 2.4.6), and CAM models in in ova studies (see pages 255, 3.4). Similarly, synergistic combination of the elected species are taught by Zohar, which discloses cannabidiol and doxorubicin administered to non-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines to produce a synergistic anti-cancer effect (OVCAR8) (see pages 20-21, Example 1, [0190]), wherein the agents can be administered in the form of capsules, syrups or tablets (see pages 18, [O101]), and kits thereof (pages 30, Claims 32-36). Claims 86-92 are drawn to the encapsulation characteristics, and the dosage form of the composition; administering the composition of the active ingredients taught above. These are within the purview of one of skill in the art for routine optimization, see Singh and Haghiralsadat). Therefore, the dependent claims add obvious features which a skilled worker would optimize using routine trial and error and without inventive ingenuity. Haghiralsadat teaches formulation of liposomal doxorubicin (L- DOX) (claim 76, claim ). L-DOX encapsulate DOX with 84% efficiency. The resulting nanoparticles were round, with a suitable particle size, and stable for 14 days. These nanoparticles allowed for adequately controlled DOX release, increased cell permeability compared to free DOX, and increased tumor cell death. L-DOX provided a novel, more effective therapy for OS treatment. Singh titled ‘Microencapsulation: a promising technique for controlled drug Delivery’ is invoked for microcapsulated dosage forms (claims 89-90). According to Singh at page 74 top of column A, “Microspheres and microcapsules are established as unique carrier systems for many pharmaceuticals and can be tailored to adhere to targeted tissue systems. Hence, microcapsules and microspheres can be used not only for controlled release but also for targeted delivery of drugs to a specific site in the body”. For simultaneous, , separate or sequential administration of anticancer compositions see claim 3 of US 8455477 and claim 5 of US 8048888. As such nothing unobvious is seen in the claims. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Marriott, Pharmaceutical Compound and Dispensing, Second Edition, 2010, 1-288. Ansel, Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems, 1999. Stephen B. Hulley, Designing Clinical Research, 4th Edition, pages 1-367, 2013. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NIZAL S CHANDRAKUMAR whose telephone number is (571)272-6202. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrew Kosar can be reached at (571) 272-0913. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NIZAL S CHANDRAKUMAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1625
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 26, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599671
COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS FOR PROTEIN DEGRADATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599672
KRAS Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590090
PYRIMIDINE-AND NITROGEN-CONTAINING BICYCLIC COMPOUND
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583872
PHOTOSENSITIZER COMPOUNDS, METHODS OF MANUFACTURE AND APPLICATION TO PLANTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582719
Chimeric Compounds and Methods of Managing Neurological Disorders or Conditions
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+17.9%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1752 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month