Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/203,967

TECHNIQUES FOR DERIVING AND/OR LEVERAGING APPLICATION-CENTRIC MODEL METRIC

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
May 31, 2023
Examiner
HUANG, WEN WU
Art Unit
2648
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
VANTOR SERVICES INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
591 granted / 812 resolved
+10.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
838
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
68.1%
+28.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 812 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-35 of prior U.S. Patent No. 11,699,108. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Claims 1-20 of the instant application teaches a scope of invention similar to the scope of U.S. Patent No. 11,699,108, specifically, claims 14-35. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Johansen et al. (US. Pub. No. 2018/0268298 A1), Moharrer (2020/0380378), Adler (10,467,473) and Sawada (2021/0133474) teach machine learning systems. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WEN WU HUANG whose telephone number is (571)272-7852. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wesley Kim can be reached at (571) 272-7867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WEN W HUANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 31, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604280
BEAM-SPECIFIC MPE REPORTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603717
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR ESTABLISHING COMMUNICATION CONNECTION TO EXTERNAL ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598467
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR EFFICIENT AND SECURE PAIRING AND COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592744
MINIATURIZED RADIO-FREQUENCY TRANSCEIVER IN MICRO MEDICAL IMPLANT FOR DUAL-FUNCTIONAL WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER AND DATA COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574067
MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD ENABLING OVER-THE-AIR MEASUREMENTS IN FULL-DUPLEX MODE FOR TWO POLARISATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+15.5%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 812 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month