Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/207,747

SAND RAIL CAR MODULARIZED LENGTHENING MODIFICATION PROGRAMS AND RAILCARS FORMED THEREBY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 09, 2023
Priority
Dec 09, 2020 — provisional 63/123,150 +2 more
Examiner
MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Jac Operations Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1249 granted / 1524 resolved
+30.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1551
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1524 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The Information Disclosure Statement filed on August 28, 2023 has been reviewed and considered by the Examiner. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Creighton (US 2011/0005425) in view of Miller (US 6,502,518). Creighton discloses a method of modifying a railcar to form an extended railcar comprising the steps of providing an existing railcar, shown in figure 1, with a plurality of hoppers 38 supported on a pair of trucks 31, 32, with the laterally end hoppers including sloped end floors, shown in figure 2A. Each end section including a center sill section, a pair of side sill sections; a pair of top chord sections, a pair of side wall sections with each side wall section extending between a side sill section and a top chord section. Figure 2A shows the forming of an underframe construction of the modified railcar between the repurposed end sections, wherein the underframe construction includes a center sill construction coupled to the center sill sections of each repurposed end section, a plurality of hopper gate openings between the repurposed end sections, and at least one hopper divider between the repurposed end sections and forming a pair of sidewall constructions 56 of the modified railcar between the repurposed end sections, wherein each sidewall construction includes a side sill section 80e coupled to one of the side sill sections of each repurposed end section; a top chord section 54 coupled to one of the top chord sections of each repurposed end section, a side wall section extending between the side sill section and the top chord section. Backing bars 80i are installed inside the hopper to support the side walls and extend from the lower side sill to the upper top chord supporting the extended roof of the car. Creighton discloses the structure of the railcar as described above. Miller recites a method of modifying a multiple hopper railcar comprised of the step of “severing railcar 10 into three sections 14, 16 and 18, and removing center section 16”. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to have utilized the step of severing or cutting, like that of Miller, with a railcar, structure, like that of Creighton, with the expected result of effectively and accurately cutting the railcar to be modified so as to allow for an accurate reattachment of the end sections. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Robert J McCarry Jr. whose telephone number is (571)272-6683. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:00-3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, S. Joseph Morano can be reached at 571-272-6684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Robert J McCarry Jr/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615 RJM November 19, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 09, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §103
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637122
MONITORING DEVICE FOR A BUFFER STOP
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637121
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING THE STATE OF A WHEEL OF A RAIL VEHICLE
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630981
IMPROVEMENTS IN RAILROAD RAIL PROFILE
3y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630199
PNEUMATIC SAND CONVEYING DEVICE FOR A SANDING SYSTEM OF A RAIL VEHICLE, SANDING SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A PNEUMATIC SAND CONVEYING DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630204
PREDICTIVE RAILROAD CROSSING SAFETY NOTIFICATION AND TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHODS
3y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.6%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1524 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month