DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Response to Arguments/Amendments
This Office Action is responsive to the amendment filed on 11/25/2025. Claims 1, 3-16, and 18-21 are pending. Claims 1, 3-6, 16, and 18 have been amended. Claim 21 is new. Claims 8, 9, and 20 are withdrawn from further consideration.
The provisional rejection of claims 1-7, and 10-19 on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-15 of copending Application No. 18/207,902 is withdrawn in response to Applicant’s amendments.
The provisional rejection of claims 1-7, and 10-19 on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-16 of copending Application No. 18/211,120 is withdrawn in response to Applicant’s amendments.
The rejection of claim 4 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, is withdrawn in response to Applicant’s amendments.
The rejection of claims 1, 6, 11, 12, and 16 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Corches et al. (WO 2018/086931) is withdrawn in response to Applicant’s amendments. Accordingly, the rejections of claims 2-5, 7, 10, 13-15, and 17-19 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over combinations of Corches, Jones (US 2020/0316501), Uz et al. (WO 2005/089621), Nomura (JP 2004-089947), Rajendran et al. (US 2018/0148883), Carpenter et al. (US 2021/0108349), and Kim et al. (US 2009/0320530) are also withdrawn.
In response to Applicant’s amendments, new/modified ground(s) of rejection are applied below.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claims 16, and 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.
Claim 16 recites the limitation "the bypass flow path." There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim.
Allowable Subject Matter
Claims 1, 3-7, 10-15, and 21 are allowed.
Claims 16, 18, and 19 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action.
Note that claims 8 and 9 appear to be eligible for rejoinder, but claim 20 does not appear to be eligible for rejoinder since it does not contain all of the limitations from an allowable claim.
The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art does not disclose, or render obvious, the washing machine as recited in either claim 1 or claim 16. There is no apparent teaching, suggestion, or motivation to modify the closest prior art, Corches et al. (WO 2018/086931), to further include the structure and function of the case, filter, and flow path switching device as claimed.
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID G CORMIER whose telephone number is (571)270-7386. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:30 - 6:00.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Barr can be reached at (571) 272-1414. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
DAVID G. CORMIER
Examiner
Art Unit 1711
/DAVID G CORMIER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1711