Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/208,741

SEGMENTED TEXT STREAM PROCESSING WITH COORDINATED DATA MODERATION GRAPH INSTANTIATION

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jun 12, 2023
Examiner
ABRISHAMKAR, KAVEH
Art Unit
2494
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
797 granted / 1020 resolved
+20.1% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1047
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
§103
39.7%
-0.3% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1020 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 1. This action is in response to the communication filed on June 12, 2023. Claims 1-20 were originally received for consideration. No preliminary amendments for the claims have been received. 2. Claims 1-20 are currently pending consideration. Information Disclosure Statement 3. Initialed and dated copies of Applicant’s IDS (form 1449), received on 9/11/2024, 9/27/2024, 10/21/2024, 04/04/2025, 4/29/2025, and 5/15/2025, are attached to this Office Action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. 4. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. The claim(s) recite(s) a method for accessing a graph, receiving a data prompt, segmenting the data prompt into segments, pruning the model graph to include the subset of nodes, generating an intermediary output comprising label values, and generating a final output. These can be performed by head and hand (see Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corp., 839 F. 3d 1138, 1139). Therefore, the claims are directed towards a mental process which is an abstract idea. This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application because there is nothing beyond the abstract idea (mental process) which integrates the abstract idea into a mental process. The claim does not mention any sort of improvement to the functioning of a computer, network performance, or disclose any technological advancements. The claim merely implementing the abstract idea on a computer as a tool which is not enough to integrate the abstract idea into a practical application (see Alice, 573 U.S. at 222-26, and Benson, 409 U.S. 63). The claim(s) does/do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because there is nothing more than towards accessing a model graph, receiving a prompt, segmenting the prompt into a plurality of segments, pruning the graph and forming a final output. All of these steps can be performed by the human mind and are therefore steps in a mental process and provide nothing significantly more than the abstract idea. Therefore, the claims are determined to be directed to an abstract idea (mathematical concept and mental process) without being integrated into a practical application and without any elements which amount to significantly more than the abstract idea. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAVEH ABRISHAMKAR whose telephone number is (571)272-3786. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jung Kim can be reached at 571-272-3804. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAVEH ABRISHAMKAR/ 01/20/2026Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2494
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 12, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598086
TOKENIZED INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION SOFTWARE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598216
SMALL-FOOTPRINT ENDPOINT DATA LOSS PREVENTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585761
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMBINING CYBER-SECURITY THREAT DETECTIONS AND ADMINISTRATOR FEEDBACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585771
LEARNED CONTROL FLOW MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT OF UNOBSERVED TRANSITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579280
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VULNERABILITY SCANNING OF DEPENDENCIES IN CONTAINERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+16.9%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1020 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month