Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/210,249

FLUID PUMP

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 15, 2023
Priority
Jun 20, 2022 — DE 102022206143.8
Examiner
BOBISH, CHRISTOPHER S
Art Unit
3746
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Mahle International GmbH
OA Round
6 (Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
603 granted / 970 resolved
-7.8% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1009
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
86.6%
+46.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 970 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/13/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-9, 11-14, and 16-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US Patent No. 11,255,342) in view of Keeney (US Patent No. 656,023). Lee teaches: limitations from claims 1 and 13, a configurable fluid pump (FIG. 1-11) for a fuel cell system having at least one fuel cell stack of multiple fuel cells (this limitation has been treated as an intended use; the pump of Lee is capable of delivering a cooling fluid and therefore meets the limitation) comprising: an impeller unit (20) for delivering a cooling fluid having an impeller (20) rotating about an axis of rotation (along shaft 2), the impeller disposed within an impeller housing (10) that is part of the impeller unit, and an electric motor (M) for driving the impeller unit, wherein the impeller unit is arranged, with respect to the axis of rotation, at an axial longitudinal end of the motor (right-hand-side of motor M as in FIG. 1) and the impeller housing (10) is firmly connected to the motor housing by means of a replaceable reusable (see FIG. 2 and FIG. 6 for example, in which each component of the pump apparatus, particularly pieces M 30 and 10, is separable from one another; if the pieces can be separated then they can be replaced) fastening unit (31, 50), wherein the replaceable reusable fastening unit is accessed from outside of an outer surface of the impeller housing (the bolts 50 extend through holes 31 in of the cover housing; FIG. 6 for example shows that holes 31 are outside of the body of housing 30; see annotated FIG. 6 below) wherein on the impeller housing an axial fluid inlet (11) of the impeller unit and a fluid outlet (12) of the impeller unit oriented corresponding to the direction of rotation and tangentially to a circumferential line which, spaced apart, is circumferential to the axis of rotation are formed (see FIG. 7-11 in particular), wherein the impeller unit is coupled to the motor in such a manner that the fluid outlet of the impeller housing with respect to the motor housing can be arranged in one of a plurality of possible positions via the fastening unit, and the possible positions of the fluid outlet differ from one another by an angle of rotation about the axis of rotation in the direction of rotation (see FIG. 7-11; C. 3 Line 66 through C. 4 Line 6 and C. 4 Line 49 through C. 5 Line 12; the holes 31 receiving bolts 50 are spaced 90o, the holes themselves allow for a range of rotation from 20o to 45o); wherein the impeller unit and the impeller housing including the inlet and outlet are a replaceable single unit the examiner interprets the impeller housing to be the outlet 12, inlet 11, and the accompanying housing structure 10, 15. The impeller unit and the impeller housing are therefore a replaceable unit, coupled to the rest of the pump via bolts 50); wherein the impeller housing is configured to be moved between the possible positions by removing the replaceable reusable fastening unit from outside of the outer surface of the impeller housing (via bolts 50) and then reinstalling the replaceable reusable fastening unit from outside of the outer surface of the impeller housing when the impeller housing is repositioned at another of the possible positions (see FIG. 5-6; C. 3 Lines 49-57 and C. 4 Lines 49-52; annotated FIG. 5-6 below clarify the examiner’s interpretation – the areas “A” are the same between cross-sections and show portions of the body 30 about openings 31 that are open and accessible); PNG media_image1.png 520 656 media_image1.png Greyscale Lee teaches that the holes 31 are spaced 90o, and that the holes have a range of 20o to 45o, but does not explicitly teach outlet angle of rotations at 30o and 60o, such that 6 or 12 positions of the outlet are possible; However, Keeney teaches a pump (see FIG. 1) in which a housing (1-2) of the pump allows for positional rotation of an outlet (4; Page 1 Lines 18-34); and wherein the positions are spaced at 30o or 60o (see Page 1 Lines 25-28, “…its discharge will project horizontally in either direction or vertically up or down or at any desired intermediate angle on either side”.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of pumps at the time the invention was filed to form the bolts and bolt holes of the pump of Lee such that the discharge may be positioned at various rotational locations including 30o and 60o, as taught by Keeney, in order to allow a more variable and robust positioning of the discharge depending on use and location of installation. The examiner notes that Keeney, like Lee, relies on bolts 10 positioned within elongated holes 9 to achieve a larger mounting range of the discharge. Lee further teaches: limitations from claims 2 and 14, characterised - in that the impeller housing is formed so as to be replaceable (FIG. 2 and FIG. 6 as described above), and - in that the impeller housing can be arranged on the motor housing differently (see FIG. 7-11), and - in that the impeller unit can be arranged on the motor housing differently (FIG. 7-11); limitations from claims 4 and 16, characterised - in that the impeller of the impeller unit is arranged with respect to the motor housing in each of the possible positions of the fluid outlet in an unchanged basic position (see FIG. 7-11; C. 4 Line 49 through C. 5 Line 12), and - in that the impeller of the impeller unit forms a basic unit and in each of the possible positions of the fluid outlet remains unchanged (FIG. 7-11), and - in that the motor of the fluid pump forms a basic unit and in each of the possible positions of the fluid outlet remains unchanged (see FIG. 7-11; C. 4 Line 49 through C. 5 Line 12); limitations from claims 6 and 17, characterised - in that the fastening unit is adapted to each of the possible positions in such a manner that in each of the possible positions of the fluid outlet it remains unchanged (FIG. 7-11), and - in that the fastening unit is adapted to each of the possible positions in such a manner that, regardless of the respective position of the fluid outlet, it is accessible (see FIG. 7-11; C. 4 Line 49 through C. 5 Line 12 wherein the fastening unit 31, 50 is accessible to further change the orientation of the outlet); limitations from claims 7 and 18, characterised - in that the fastening unit is a screw unit (31, 50), wherein the screw unit comprises multiple screw groups each with at least one screw point (see FIG. 6 and FIG. 7-11; C. 4 Line 49 through C. 5 Line 12), and - in that the arrangement of the respective screw groups is adapted to the possible positions of the fluid outlet in such a manner that, regardless of the respective possible position of the fluid outlet, they are axially accessible on the impeller side (FIG. 1-2); limitations from claims 8 and 19, characterised in that the fluid outlet (12) in the respective possible position is arranged between the screw groups that are adjacent in the direction of rotation (see FIG. 7, 9, and 10); limitations from claim 9, characterised - in that the respective screw points are identical to one another (see FIG. 7-11; C. 4 Line 49 through C. 5 Line 12), and - in that the respective screw groups are identical to one another (FIG. 7-11), and - in that the respective screw groups are arranged evenly distributed about the axis of rotation (see FIG. 7-11; C. 4 Line 49 through C. 5 Line 12), and - in that the respective screw groups have an identical distance from the axis of rotation (see FIG. 7-11; C. 4 Line 49 through C. 5 Line 12); limitations from claim 11, characterized - in that all position-relevant contours of the motor are formed so as to axially face away from the impeller unit and all position-relevant contours of the impeller unit so as to axially face away from the motor (FIG. 1-2; see above annotated FIG), and - in that the motor and the impeller unit lie on one another transversely to the axis of rotation and exclusively rotation-transmitting elements of the motor and of the impeller unit axially engage into one another (FIG. 1-2), and - in that the impeller is completely received in the impeller housing (see FIG. 1), and - in that the motor forms a cover for the impeller unit and lies on the impeller unit (see FIG. 1); limitations from claim 12, wherein the electric motor for driving the impeller has a rotation-unsymmetrical motor housing (see FIG. 1); Keeney further teaches: limitations from claim 5, characterised - in that the angle of rotation amounts to 60o or 120o or 180o or 240o or 300o (see Page 1 Lines 25-28, “…its discharge will project horizontally in either direction or vertically up or down or at any desired intermediate angle on either side”.); Claim(s) 1, 10, and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US Patent No. 11,255,342) in view of Price (US Patent No. 2,695,131). Lee teaches: limitations from claims 1 and 13, a configurable fluid pump (FIG. 1-11) for a fuel cell system having at least one fuel cell stack of multiple fuel cells (this limitation has been treated as an intended use; the pump of Lee is capable of delivering a cooling fluid and therefore meets the limitation) comprising: an impeller unit (20) for delivering a cooling fluid having an impeller (20) rotating about an axis of rotation (along shaft 2), the impeller disposed within an impeller housing (10) that is part of the impeller unit, and an electric motor (M) for driving the impeller unit, wherein the impeller unit is arranged, with respect to the axis of rotation, at an axial longitudinal end of the motor (right-hand-side of motor M as in FIG. 1) and the impeller housing (10) is firmly connected to the motor housing by means of a replaceable reusable (see FIG. 2 and FIG. 6 for example, in which each component of the pump apparatus, particularly pieces M 30 and 10, is separable from one another; if the pieces can be separated then they can be replaced) fastening unit (31, 50), wherein the replaceable reusable fastening unit is accessed from outside of an outer surface of the impeller housing (the bolts 50 extend through holes 31 in of the cover housing; FIG. 6 for example shows that holes 31 are outside of the body of housing 30; see annotated FIG. 6 below) wherein on the impeller housing an axial fluid inlet (11) of the impeller unit and a fluid outlet (12) of the impeller unit oriented corresponding to the direction of rotation and tangentially to a circumferential line which, spaced apart, is circumferential to the axis of rotation are formed (see FIG. 7-11 in particular), wherein the impeller unit is coupled to the motor in such a manner that the fluid outlet of the impeller housing with respect to the motor housing can be arranged in one of a plurality of possible positions via the fastening unit, and the possible positions of the fluid outlet differ from one another by an angle of rotation about the axis of rotation in the direction of rotation (see FIG. 7-11; C. 3 Line 66 through C. 4 Line 6 and C. 4 Line 49 through C. 5 Line 12; the holes 31 receiving bolts 50 are spaced 90o, the holes themselves allow for a range of rotation from 20o to 45o); wherein the impeller unit and the impeller housing including the inlet and outlet are a replaceable single unit the examiner interprets the impeller housing to be the outlet 12, inlet 11, and the accompanying housing structure 10, 15. The impeller unit and the impeller housing are therefore a replaceable unit, coupled to the rest of the pump via bolts 50); wherein the impeller housing is configured to be moved between the possible positions by removing the replaceable reusable fastening unit from outside of the outer surface of the impeller housing (via bolts 50) and then reinstalling the replaceable reusable fastening unit from outside of the outer surface of the impeller housing when the impeller housing is repositioned at another of the possible positions (see FIG. 5-6; C. 3 Lines 49-57 and C. 4 Lines 49-52; annotated FIG. 5-6 below clarify the examiner’s interpretation – the areas “A” are the same between cross-sections and show portions of the body 30 about openings 31 that are open and accessible); PNG media_image1.png 520 656 media_image1.png Greyscale Lee teaches that the holes 31 are spaced 90o, and that the holes have a range of 20o to 45o, but does not explicitly teach outlet angle of rotations at 30o and 60o, such that 6 or 12 positions of the outlet are possible; Lee teaches the use of bolts (50) to attach and de-attach the pump and motor housings, rather than a clamping holder; Price teaches: limitations from claims 1, 10, and 13, a pump (supercharger 10) having an impeller (25) and housing (12) therefore; a fastening unit (20), the fastening unit is a clamping holder, wherein the clamping holder firmly connects the impeller housing (12, 18) to a drive housing (11, 19) in a force-fitted and/or form- fitted manner, and - in that the clamping holder is formed in such a manner that the impeller housing, with respect to the motor housing, can be fastened with any angle of rotation greater than 0 o (C. 2 Lines 29-47 and C. 3 Lines 66-70); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art of pumps at the time the invention was filed to utilize a clamp mechanism as taught by Price in place of the fasteners of Lee, in order to allow for a more robust adjustment of the outlet position (the clamp of Price allows for 360 o motion which includes 30o and 60o). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 10/13/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that bolts 50 are accessible only from inside of the cover housing 30 (page 12 of the response). As outlined in the above rejection, the examiner disagrees. The Figures, particularly FIG. 6 show openings 31 for bolts 50 that are open to the environment. The second cross-section in FIG. 6 shows a cylindrical center wall and two half-circle outer walls. The openings are positioned outward of the cylindrical wall and offset from the partial outer walls, thereby allowing access to the bolts. The examiner maintains that if the openings (and therefore the bolts 50) were accessible only from inside the body 30, the bolts would be inaccessible for the functions of the invention (loosening the bolts to replace/move the impeller housing). PNG media_image1.png 520 656 media_image1.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER S BOBISH whose telephone number is (571)270-5289. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Essama Omgba can be reached at 469-295-9278. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER S BOBISH/Examiner, Art Unit 3746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 8 earlier events
Jul 14, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 01, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 01, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 13, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 26, 2026
Response Filed
May 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12631169
RECIPROCATING COMPRESSOR
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631102
SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO AUTONOMOUSLY OPERATE HYDRAULIC FRACTURING UNITS
1y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624506
ASPHALT DISTRIBUTOR WITH MULTISPEED MOTOR
3y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12618406
THERMISTOR FLOW PATH
1y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12607174
Pump Device
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+29.3%)
3y 4m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 970 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month