Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/210,393

AXIAL FLUX MACHINE AND STATOR FOR AXIAL FLUX MACHINE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 15, 2023
Examiner
MOK, ALEX W
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
High Tech Battery Inc.
OA Round
3 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
827 granted / 1114 resolved
+6.2% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1158
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
63.6%
+23.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1114 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Amendment Acknowledgement is made of applicant’s Response filed January 18, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-7, 9, 13, 15, 16, and 21-27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tokoi et al. (US Patent No.: 10756600) in view of Klippert (Foreign Patent Document No.: DE 10253072 A1) and Miyasaka (US Patent Application Pub. No.: US 2021/0257890 A1). For claim 1, Tokoi et al. disclose the claimed invention comprising: a plurality of stator bars (reference numeral 110, figure 1A) disposed generally radially around an axis (see figure 1A); a plurality of sets of windings (reference numeral 120), each set of windings (reference numeral 120) being wound around a respective one of the plurality of stator bars (reference numeral 110) and being operable to generate a magnetic field generally parallel to the axis (see figures 1A, 2, 3); and electrical interconnects (reference numeral 300) electrically connected with the plurality of sets of windings (reference numeral 120, see figures 1A, 2, 3). Tokoi et al. however do not specifically disclose wherein the plurality of sets of windings are each respectively formed by: a main winding portion formed by one or more coil loops; a first end portion extending directly from the main winding portion; and a second end portion extending directly from the main winding portion; wherein at least one of the first end portion or the second end portion includes a generally U-shaped hook portion engaged with one or more portions of the electrical interconnects. Klippert discloses a main winding portion (reference numerals 50, 511, see figure 3) formed by one or more coil loops (see figure 3); a first end portion (reference numeral 501) extending directly from the main winding portion (see figure 3); and a second end portion (reference numeral 502) extending directly from the main winding portion (see figure 3). Miyasaka discloses at least one of the first end portion or the second end portion (reference numerals 36n, 36v, figure 3) including a generally U-shaped hook portion (see figures 3, 7A) engaged with one or more portions of the electrical interconnects (reference numerals 80, 100, see figure 3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the main winding portion, first end portion, and second end portion as disclosed by Klippert and also the U-shape configuration as disclosed by Miyasaka for the end portions of Tokoi et al. and Klippert for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the connections within the device. For claim 2, Tokoi et al. disclose the electrical interconnects (reference numeral 300) comprising radially outwardly disposed electrical interconnects (reference numeral 300) disposed radially outwardly of the plurality of stator bars (reference numeral 110, see figures 1A, 2, 3), each of the radially outwardly disposed electrical interconnects (reference numeral 300) electrically connecting two or more of the plurality of sets of windings (reference numeral 120) together (i.e. at least two windings 120 being connected to the interconnects 300, see figures 1A, 3); and wherein the radially outwardly disposed electrical interconnects (reference numeral 300) are collectively arranged circumferentially around or along the entire radially outer periphery of the plurality of stator bars (reference numeral 110, see figures 1A, 3). For claim 3, Tokoi et al. disclose the radially outwardly disposed electrical interconnects (reference numeral 300) being disposed such that: in front view, the radially outwardly disposed electrical interconnects (reference numeral 300) are substantially entirely distributed on at least one generally circular path (see figures 1A, 1B, 2) that has a center generally corresponding to a location of the axis (see figures 1A, 3). For claim 5, Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka disclose the claimed invention except for the electrical interconnects further comprising: radially inwardly disposed electrical interconnects disposed radially inwardly of the plurality of stator bars, each of the radially inwardly disposed electrical interconnects electrically connecting two or more of the plurality of sets of windings together; wherein the radially inwardly disposed electrical interconnects are collectively arranged circumferentially around or along an entire radially inner periphery of the plurality of stator bars. Klippert further discloses radially inwardly disposed electrical interconnects (reference numeral 7, figures 4, 5) disposed radially inwardly of the plurality of stator bars (reference numeral 51, see figures 1, 5), each of the radially inwardly disposed electrical interconnects (reference numeral 7) electrically connecting two or more of the plurality of sets of windings (reference numeral 50) together (i.e. figure 3 shows the winding 50 having ends 501, 502 on a radially inner side which would be connected to the radially inwardly disposed electrical interconnects 7 in figure 5); wherein the radially inwardly disposed electrical interconnects (reference numeral 7) are collectively arranged circumferentially around or along an entire radially inner periphery of the plurality of stator bars (reference numeral 51, see figure 5). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have radially inwardly disposed electrical interconnects as disclosed by Klippert for the electrical interconnects of Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the connections within the device. For claim 6, Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka disclose the claimed invention except for the radially inwardly disposed electrical interconnects being disposed such that: in front view, the radially inwardly disposed electrical interconnects are substantially entirely distributed on one or more generally circular paths each with a center generally corresponding to a location of the axis. Klippert further discloses the radially inwardly disposed electrical interconnects (reference numeral 7) being substantially entirely distributed on one or more generally circular paths (see figure 4) each with a center generally corresponding to a location of the axis (see figures 4, 5), and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the generally circular path as disclosed by Klippert for the electrical interconnects of Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the connections within the device. For claim 7, Tokoi et al. disclose the electrical interconnects (reference numeral 300) consisting only of the radially outwardly disposed electrical interconnects (reference numeral 300, see figures 1A, 2, 3); and wherein the stator (reference numeral 100) is completely devoid of radially inwardly disposed electrical interconnect disposed radially inwardly of the plurality of stator bars (see figures 1A, 2, 3). For claim 9, Tokoi et al. disclose the plurality of sets of windings comprising: a plurality of first pairs of sets of windings (i.e. windings indicated with + sign in figure 1C, see also column 5, lines 31-41) wound in a first sense, each first pair of sets of windings including two sets of windings disposed immediately adjacent each other (i.e. windings indicated with + sign in figure 1C, see also column 5, lines 31-41), and a plurality of second pairs of sets of windings (i.e. windings indicated with - sign in figure 1C, see also column 5, lines 31-41) wound in a second sense, each second pair of sets of windings including two sets of windings disposed immediately adjacent each other (i.e. windings indicated with - sign in figure 1C, see also column 5, lines 31-41); and wherein the plurality of first pairs of sets of windings and the plurality of second pairs of sets of windings are arranged in an interleaved manner (see figure 1C). For claim 13, Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka disclose the claimed invention except for the first end portion and the second end portion being disposed: on opposite lateral sides of the corresponding set of winding; on generally the same lateral side of the corresponding set of winding; or in a mid-plane defined by the corresponding set of winding and generally parallel to the axis and generally perpendicular to an axial plane. Klippert further discloses the first and second end portions (reference numerals 501, 502) being on the same lateral side of the winding (see figure 3), and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the first and second end portions on the same lateral side as disclosed by Klippert for the first and second end portions of Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the connections within the device. For claim 15, Tokoi et al. disclose the plurality of sets of windings (reference numeral 120) being electrically connected, via the electrical interconnects (reference numeral 300, figures 1A, 2), in a multi-phase arrangement (i.e. phases U, V, W, see figure 1C). For claim 16, Tokoi et al. disclose the plurality of sets of windings (reference numeral 120) being electrically connected, via the electrical interconnects (reference numeral 300, figures 1A, 2), in a multi-phase arrangement (i.e. phases U, V, W, see figure 1C); and wherein the stator further comprises a plurality of stator terminals (reference numeral 330, see figure 1B) electrically connected with at least some of the radially outwardly disposed electrical interconnects (reference numeral 300, see figure 1B). For claim 21, Tokoi et al. disclose a shoe portion (reference numeral 150, see figure 7), i.e. each respective stator bar comprising at least one shoe portion for confining the corresponding set of windings wound around the stator bar. For claim 22, Tokoi et al. disclose a cross section of the electrical interconnects (reference numeral 300) being rectangular, squared, or rounded (see figure 2). For claim 23, Tokoi et al. disclose an axial flux machine (reference numeral 1000) with the stator (reference numeral 100) and rotor (reference numeral 200, see figure 1A), i.e. an axial flux machine comprising: the stator of claim 1; and a rotor. For claim 24, Tokoi et al. disclose the axial flux machine (reference numeral 1000) being a motor or a generator (see column 4, lines 65+). For claim 25, applying the disclosed invention of Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka to an apparatus such as an electrical device or system merely discloses the intended use of the invention, which does not result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art. For claim 26, Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka disclose the claimed invention except for each of the first end portion and the second end portion respectively including the generally U-shaped hook portion. Miyasaka further discloses each of the first end portion and the second end portion (reference numerals 36n, 36v) respectively including the generally U-shaped hook portion (see figures 3, 7A). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the two end portions with the U-shape as disclosed by Miyasaka for the first end portion and the second end portion of Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the connections within the device. For claim 27, Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka disclose the claimed invention except for the main winding portion defining a center axial plane; and the generally U-shaped portion at least partly extending inwardly towards the center axial plane. Klippert discloses the main winding portion (reference numerals 50, 511) defining a center axial plane (see figure 3), and Miyasaka already discloses the U-shaped portion (see figure 3, reference numerals 36n, 36v) partly extending inwardly towards a center axial plane (i.e. the U-shaped portion of end portions 36n, 36v partly extending towards a center axis of winding 35, see figure 3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the center axial plane for the main winding portion as disclosed by Klippert and to have the U-shaped portion partly extending towards the center axial plane as disclosed by Miyasaka for the main winding portion of Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the connections within the device. Claim(s) 4, 17, 18, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka as applied to claims 2 and 16 above, and further in view of Yoneoka et al. (US Patent Application Pub. No.: US 2021/0135530 A1). For claim 4, Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka disclose the claimed invention except for the radially outwardly disposed electrical interconnects being disposed such that: in front view, the radially outwardly disposed electrical interconnects are substantially entirely distributed on multiple generally circular paths, the multiple generally circular paths have different sizes and have generally the same center generally corresponding to a location of the axis. Yoneoka et al. disclose the radially outwardly disposed electrical interconnects (reference numerals 55-U, 55-V, 55-W) being substantially entirely distributed on multiple generally circular paths (see figure 1), the multiple generally circular paths have different sizes (each of the interconnects 55-U, 55-V, 55-W have circular shapes, each circular shape have different diameters as shown in figure 1) and have generally the same center generally corresponding to a location of the axis (see figure 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the multiple circular paths with different sizes as disclosed by Yoneoka et al. for the electrical interconnects of Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the connections within the device. For claim 17, Tokoi et al. disclose the plurality of stator bars (reference numeral 110) defining a center axial plane generally perpendicular to the axis (see figure 1A), but Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka however do not specifically disclose the plurality of stator terminals extending generally outwardly with respect to the axis and generally parallel to the center axial plane. Yoneoka et al. disclose the stator terminals (reference numeral 57) extending outwardly with respect to the axis (see figure 1) and parallel to the center axial plane (i.e. extending parallel to an axial plane, see figure 1), and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the stator terminals extending outwardly and parallel to the center axial plane as disclosed by Yoneoka et al. for the stator terminals of Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the connections within the device. For claim 18, Tokoi et al. disclose the plurality of stator bars (reference numeral 110) defining a center axial plane generally perpendicular to the axis (see figure 1A), but Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert, Miyasaka, and Yoneoka et al. however do not specifically disclose the plurality of stator terminals extending in one or more axial planes axially offset from and generally parallel to the center axial plane. Yoneoka et al. further disclose the stator terminals (reference numeral 57) extending in one or more axial planes axially offset from and generally parallel to the center axial plane (i.e. extending parallel to an axial plane, see figure 1, and axially offset from and generally parallel to the center axial plane as shown in figures 6 and 7), and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the stator terminals extending in one or more axial planes axially offset from and generally parallel to the center axial plane as disclosed by Yoneoka et al. for the stator terminals of Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert, Miyasaka, and Yoneoka et al. for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the connections within the device. For claim 20, Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka disclose the claimed invention except for a stator housing at least partly receiving the plurality of stator bars, the plurality of sets of windings, and the electrical interconnects, the stator housing defining a single opening through which the plurality of stator terminals extend. Yoneoka et al. disclose a stator housing (reference numeral 40) at least partly receiving the plurality of stator bars (reference numeral 31, see figures 1, 4, 5), the plurality of sets of windings (reference numeral 33, figures 4, 5), and the electrical interconnects (reference numerals 55-U, 55-V, 55-W, see figure 1), the stator housing defining a single opening (reference numeral 45, see figures 1, 6, 7) through which the plurality of stator terminals extend (see figures 1, 6, 7). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the stator housing and the single opening for the housing as disclosed by Yoneoka et al. for the stator of Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the connections within the device. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Yokoyama et al. (US Patent Application Pub. No.: US 2019/0234251 A1). For claim 8, Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka disclose the claimed invention except for the plurality of sets of windings being wound in the same sense. Having the winding wound in the same sense is a known skill as exhibited by Yokoyama et al. (i.e. each of the coils are wound in the same direction, see paragraph [0063]), and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the windings wound in the same direction as disclosed by Yokoyama et al. for the sets of windings of Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the winding performance within the device. Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Masuda (US Patent No.: 10886808). For claim 14, Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka disclose the claimed invention except for the first end portion and the second end portion being disposed radially outwardly of the main winding portion; or wherein the first end portion and the second end portion are disposed one radially outwardly of the main winding portion and another radially inwardly of the main winding portion. Having the first and second end portions be disposed either radially outwardly or disposed on opposite sides, radially inwardly and radially outwardly, is a known skill as exhibited by Masuda (reference numerals 53a, 54a, see figures 2 (B), 4 (B)), and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the first and second end portions be disposed on the radially outwardly side or have each one disposed on opposite sides as disclosed by Masuda for the first and second end portions of Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the connections within the device. Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka as applied to claim 16 above, and further in view of Yoneoka et al. (US Patent Application Pub. No.: US 2021/0135530 A1) in view of Imai et al. (US Patent No.: 8916999). For claim 19, Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka disclose the claimed invention except for a stator housing at least partly receiving the plurality of stator bars, the plurality of sets of windings, and the electrical interconnects, the stator housing defining a plurality of openings through which the plurality of stator terminals extend. Yoneoka et al. disclose a stator housing (reference numeral 40) at least partly receiving the plurality of stator bars (reference numeral 31, see figures 1, 4, 5), the plurality of sets of windings (reference numeral 33, figures 4, 5), and the electrical interconnects (reference numerals 55-U, 55-V, 55-W, see figure 1), the stator housing defining an opening (reference numeral 45, see figures 1, 6, 7) through which the plurality of stator terminals extend (see figures 1, 6, 7). Having a plurality of openings for the housing is a known skill as exhibited by Imai et al. (near reference numerals H1, H2 for housing 3, see figure 20), which when applied to the stator housing of Yoneoka et al. would disclose the stator housing defining a plurality of openings for the stator terminals. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the stator housing as disclosed by Yoneoka et al. and also have the plurality of openings as disclosed by Imai et al. for the stator of Tokoi et al. in view of Klippert and Miyasaka for predictably providing desirable configuration for facilitating the connections within the device. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-9 and 13-27 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEX W MOK whose telephone number is (571)272-9084. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Seye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEX W MOK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 15, 2023
Application Filed
May 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 09, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 29, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603533
ROTOR ASSEMBLY FOR AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603532
ELECTRIC MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597815
ROTOR FOR A ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592625
PERMANENT MAGNET ARRANGEMENT OF A SHUTTLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592623
ROTOR STRUCTURE OF ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+21.2%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1114 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month