DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 8-15 and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a2) as being anticipated by Tsai et al (US 11,807,710). The applied reference has a common assignee and at least one inventor with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. Tsai sets forth UV curable resins used for chemical mechanical polishing pads. Said UV curable resin comprises (a) one or more acrylate blocked isocyanates, (b) one or more acrylate monomers, and (c) a photoinitiator —see title an abstract. Tsai defines component (a) one or more acrylate blocked isocyanates as an acrylate urethane oligomer—see col. 5, lines 27-28. Regarding claims 1 and 2: Said resin composition comprises (a) one or more acrylate blocked isocyanates (urethane acrylate oligomer) , (b) one or more acrylate monomers, (c) a photoinitiator ; and one or more additives—see col. 5, lines 25-30. Said additives include stabilizers, plasticizers, porogen fillers and/or pigments—see col. 6, lines 6-8. Thus, claims 1-2 are anticipated. Regarding claims 3-5: Said one or more acrylate blocked isocyanates formed from isocyanate-terminated urethane prepolymers, such as aromatic prepolymers, and aliphatic prepolymers (col. 6, line 67 to col. 7, line 1) reacted with acrylate blocking agents such as 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), 2-(tert- butylamino ) ethyl methacrylate (TBEMA), and 3-( acryloyloxy )-2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (AHPMA) –see col. 5, lines 30-40 and figure 1A. Thus, claims 3- 5 are anticipated. Regarding claims 8-9: Said component (b) the one or more acrylate monomer comprises one or more of isobornyl methacrylate (IBMA), 2-carboxyethyl acrylate (CEA), 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA), ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA), neopentyl glycol dimethacrylate (NGDMA), 3-( acryloyloxy )-2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (AHPMA), trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA)—see col. 5, lines 60-65. Said component (c), the photoinitiator , comprises at least diphenylphosphine oxide (TPO) can be used as the photoinitiator , which may be irradiated by 365 nm UV LED light—see col. 6, lines 1-5. Thus, claims 8-9 are anticipated. Regarding claim s 10 -15 and 18-19 : Tsai sets forth chemical-mechanical polishing pads prepared from said UV-curable resin, as described above and anticipating the composition of claims 11-15 and 18-19, using an additive manufacturing process, see figures 1B and col. 10, lines 38-40. Said process includes a plurality of thin layers of pad material are progressively formed and each layer of the plurality of layers may be formed via UV-initiated reaction of a precursor material to form a thin layer of solidified pad material—see figure 1B and col. 6, lines 33-37. In light of above, the presently cited claims are anticipate d by the reference. Claim(s) 1- 6 and 8-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a1) as being anticipated by Rolland et al (US9,453,142) . (note: the limitation “for preparing a chemical-mechanical polishing pad” is a future intended limitation). Rolland sets forth polyurethane resin having multiple mechanisms of hardening for use in the production of three-dimensional objects—see title. Rolland explicitly sets forth a polymerizable liquid, or resin, useful for the production by additive manufacturing of a three-dimensional object of polyurethane, polyurea, or a copolymer thereof. Rolland teaches said polymerizable liquid comprises: 5 or 20 or 40 percent by weight to 60 or 80 or 90 percent by weight of the blocked or reactive blocked prepolymer; from 10 or 20 percent by weight to 30 or 40 or 50 percent by weight of the reactive diluent; from 5 or 10 percent by weight to 20 or 30 percent by weight of the chain extender; and from 0.1 or 0.2 percent by weight to 1, 2 or 4 percent by weight of the photoinitiator , and additional ingredients, such as dyes, fillers (e.g., silica), surfactants —see col. 35, lines 61 to col. 36, line 7. Said reactive blocked prepolymer is blocked by reaction of a polyisocyanate with an amine (meth)acrylate monomer blocking agent (e.g., tertiary- butylaminoethyl methacrylate (TBAEMA), tertiary pentylaminoethyl methacrylate (TPAEMA), tertiary hexylaminoethyl methacrylate (THAEMA), tertiary- butylaminopropyl methacrylate (TBAPMA), acrylate , wherein the polyisocyanate is produced by the reaction of at least one diisocyanate (e.g., a diisocyanate such as hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexyl)methane (HMDI), isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), etc., a triisocyanate , etc.) with at least one polyol (e.g., a polyether or polyester or polybutadiene diol). —see col. 33, lines 42-48 and 49-55. Regarding claims 1- 6 and 8 : Rolland explicitly sets forth a resin composition comprising 697 parts by weight of an acrylate blocked polyurethane ( cls . 1) ; 82 parts by weight of di(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate; 82 parts by weight of isobornyl methacrylate (cl. 8) ; 123 parts by weight of 4,4’-diaminocyclohexyl methane (secondary diamine, cl. 6) ; and 5 parts by weight of phenylbis (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide as the photoinitiator , wherein said acrylate blocke d polyurethane is the reaction product of an aliphatic isocyanate terminated polyurethane with the acrylate- blocking agent , tertiary- butylaminoethyl methacrylate ( cls . 3 . 4, 5 and 6)—see example 19 and Table 4 in col. 89. Regarding claim 9: Rolland sets forth in the overall teachings of the reference a dual cure resin comprised of a UV-curable (meth)acrylate blocked polyurethane (ABPU), a reactive diluent, a photoinitiator , and a chain extender(s). The reactive diluent (10-50 wt. %) is an acrylate or methacrylate that helps to reduce the viscosity of ABPU and will be copolymerized with the ABPU under UV irradiation. The photoinitiator (generally about 1 wt. %) include phosphine oxide s, such as diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (cl. 9) , phenylbis (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (PPO), and Irgacure 369—col. 39, lines 23-35. Rolland sets forth polyurethane resin having multiple mechanisms of hardening for use in the production of three-dimensional objects—see title. Rolland explicitly sets forth a polymerizable liquid, or resin, useful for the production by additive manufacturing of a three-dimensional object of polyurethane, polyurea, or a copolymer thereof. Rolland teaches said polymerizable liquid comprises: 5 or 20 or 40 percent by weight to 60 or 80 or 90 percent by weight of the blocked or reactive blocked prepolymer; from 10 or 20 percent by weight to 30 or 40 or 50 percent by weight of the reactive diluent; from 5 or 10 percent by weight to 20 or 30 percent by weight of the chain extender; and from 0.1 or 0.2 percent by weight to 1, 2 or 4 percent by weight of the photoinitiator , and additional ingredients, such as dyes, fillers (e.g., silica), surfactants—see col. 35, lines 61 to col. 36, line 7. Rolland sets forth said reactive blocked prepolymers are blocked by reaction of a polyisocyanate oligomer, a diisocyanate, and/or a chain extender with an amine(meth)acrylate, alcohol(meth)acrylate, maleimide, or n- vinylformamide monomer blocking agent—see col. 3, lines 31-37 , F igure 25B and 25C , and scheme in col. 46, last paragraph to col. 48, line 23. Said reactive diluents set forth by Rolland include (meth) acrylate monomers, such as di (ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate, isobornyl methacrylate, methyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate; and poly (ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate —see examples and col. 88, lines 18-26. Said photoinitiators set forth by Rolland include phosphine oxide s, such as diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (cl. 9), phenylbis (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (PPO), and Irgacure 369—col. 39, lines 23-35. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 11- 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rolland (cited above) in view of Tsai (cited above) . Rolland sets forth polymerizable liquids comprising polyurethane resin s having multiple mechanisms of hardening for use in the production of three-dimensional objects—see title. Said objects are obtained using additive manufacture methods—abstract . S aid polymerizable liquid comprises: 5 or 20 or 40 percent by weight to 60 or 80 or 90 percent by weight of a (meth)acrylate blocked polyurethane ; from 10 or 20 percent by weight to 30 or 40 or 50 percent by weight of the reactive diluent; from 5 or 10 percent by weight to 20 or 30 percent by weight of the chain extender; and from 0.1 or 0.2 percent by weight to 1, 2 or 4 percent by weight of the photoinitiator , and additional ingredients, such as dyes, fillers (e.g., silica), surfactants —see col. 35, lines 61 to col. 36, line 7 . Rolland sets forth said reactive blocked prepolymers are blocked by reaction of a polyisocyanate oligomer, a diisocyanate , a chain extender with an alcohol(meth)acrylate (claims 20) —see col. 3, lines 31-37, Figure 25B and 25C, and scheme in col. 46, last paragraph to col. 48, line 23. Rolland does not expressly set forth preparing chemical-mechanical polishing pads from the above composition. However, Rolland does set forth production of 3D objects by additive manufacturing with the above composition. Tsai sets forth it is known in the art chemical-mechanical polishing pads are formed by additive manufacturing processes typically involving a dual (two-step) curing process that comprises UV curing and thermal curing of a resin, wherein the resin is typically formed of the following mixture: a UV-curable (meth)acrylate blocked polyurethane , a reactive diluent, a photoinitiator , and at least one chain extender, such as diols, diamines, triols, and/or triamines. Said process comprises as a first step, the resin being subjected to UV curing, and a second step, the (meth)acrylate blocked polyurethane resin, carrying the chain extender, is subjected to thermal curing and a high molecular weight polyurethane/polyurea is formed by the spontaneous reaction between the polyurethane/polyurea oligomers and the chain extender(s) —col. 2, lines 17-58. Rolland and Tsai are analogous art since they are from the same field of endeavor, that is 3D objects using additive manufacturing process and UV polymerizable liquids comprising acrylate blocked polyurethane resins. It would have been within the skill level of an ordinarily skilled artisan to use obtain a chemical-mechanical polishing pad from the UV polymerizable resin composition set forth by Rolland using a known method with a known composition, as seen by Tsai et al with expectation of success in absence of evidence to the contrary and/or unexpected results. Claim(s) 1-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rolland (cited above). Rolland sets forth polyurethane resin having multiple mechanisms of hardening for use in the production of three-dimensional objects—see title. Rolland explicitly sets forth a polymerizable liquid, or resin, useful for the production by additive manufacturing of a three-dimensional object of polyurethane, polyurea, or a copolymer thereof. Rolland teaches said polymerizable liquid comprises: 5 or 20 or 40 percent by weight to 60 or 80 or 90 percent by weight of the blocked or reactive blocked prepolymer; from 10 or 20 percent by weight to 30 or 40 or 50 percent by weight of the reactive diluent; from 5 or 10 percent by weight to 20 or 30 percent by weight of the chain extender; and from 0.1 or 0.2 percent by weight to 1, 2 or 4 percent by weight of the photoinitiator , and additional ingredients, such as dyes, fillers (e.g., silica), surfactants—see col. 35, lines 61 to col. 36, line 7 (cl. 1-2) . Rolland sets forth said reactive blocked prepolymers are blocked by reaction of a polyisocyanate oligomer, a diisocyanate, and/or a chain extender with an amine(meth)acrylate, alcohol(meth)acrylate, maleimide, or n- vinylformamide monomer blocking agent (claim s 3 and 6 ) —see col. 3, lines 31-37, Figure 25B and 25C, and scheme in col. 46, last paragraph to col. 48, line 23. Rolland sets forth the preferred acrylate blocking agent is tertiary- butylaminoethyl methacrylate (e.g., TBAEMA) (claim 4)—see col. 33, lines 59-60. It is taught the blocked or reactive blocked prepolymer comprises a polyisocyanate oligomer produced by the reaction of at least one diisocyanate (e.g., a diisocyanate such as hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), bis-(4-isocyanatocyclohexyl) methane (HMDI), isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), etc., a triisocyanate , etc.) with at least one polyol (e.g., a polyether or polyester or polybutadiene diol), wherein said polyisocyanates are aliphatic (claim 5)—see col. 33, lines 42-48. Said reactive diluents set forth by Rolland include (meth) acrylate monomers, such as di (ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate, isobornyl methacrylate (cl8) , methyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate; and poly (ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate —see examples and col. 88, lines 18-26. Said photoinitiators set forth by Rolland include phosphine oxide s, such as diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (cl. 9), phenylbis (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (PPO), and Irgacure 369—col. 39, lines 23-35. In light of the above teachings if it deemed a skilled artisan could have obtain a composition as set forth in claims 1-6 and 8-9 with an expectation of successfully obtaining a 3D objected by additive manufacturing methods in absence of evidence to the contrary and/or unexpected results. Rolland does not expressly set forth the molar ratio of secondary diamine to the urethane prepolymer being from 1 to 2; however, applicant has not expressly set forth the criticality of said ratio, and additionally, a commonly skilled artisan would understand a molar ratio of at least one would be needed to chain extend at least one of the functional isocyanate end-groups to obtain the acrylate blocked chain extended polyurethane set forth in the teachings and schemes found in the figures and disclosure in absence of evidence to the contrary and/or unexpected results. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FILLIN "Examiner name" \* MERGEFORMAT SANZA L MCCLENDON whose telephone number is FILLIN "Phone number" \* MERGEFORMAT (571)272-1074 . The examiner can normally be reached FILLIN "Work Schedule?" \* MERGEFORMAT 8-5 . Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, FILLIN "SPE Name?" \* MERGEFORMAT Heidi Riviere-Kelley can be reached at FILLIN "SPE Phone?" \* MERGEFORMAT 571-270-1831 . The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SANZA L. McCLENDON / Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1765 SMc