Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/210,717

METHODS, DEVICES, AND SYSTEMS FOR AUGMENTED REALITY

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 16, 2023
Priority
Mar 06, 2023 — provisional 63/450,258
Examiner
LAMB II, CHRISTOPHER A
Art Unit
2882
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Tencent America LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
342 granted / 479 resolved
+3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
513
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.1%
+12.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 479 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status Acknowledgement is made of the amendment filed 12/29/2025 which amended claims 1, 9, 12-14, 16 and 18-19. Claims 1-20 are currently pending in the application for patent. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-7, 9-16 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Peng et al (US 2022/0179147; hereinafter referred to as Peng) in view of Kim et al (US 2019/0086671; hereinafter referred to as Kim). Regarding Claims 1 and 12, Peng discloses an apparatus (Figure 10A; AR Display System 1000) for providing an augmented reality (AR) display (see Paragraph [0065]; wherein it is disclosed that the backlights and displays of this disclosure may be configured to at least partially transmit light, which makes them suitable for augmented reality (AR) displays), the apparatus (Figure 10A; AR Display System 1000) comprising: a first linear polarizer (Figure 6; Polarizer 628) configured to allow light from an object to transmit through as a polarized light (see Paragraph [0065]; wherein it is disclosed that the backlights and displays of this disclosure may be configured to at least partially transmit light); a liquid crystal layer (Figure 6; LC Layer 620) disposed on the first linear polarizer (Figure 6; Polarizer 628) and at an opposite side with respect to the object (see Figure 6), the liquid crystal layer (Figure 6; LC Layer 620) comprising an array of liquid crystal pixels corresponding to AR content (see Abstract and Paragraph [0065]), each pixel configured to modify the polarized light (see Abstract and Paragraph [0065]); and eyeglasses (Figure 11; HMD 1100) worn by a user and configured to directly receive the modified polarized light (see Paragraph [0067]), at least one lens of the eyeglasses (Figure 11; HMD 1100) comprising a second linear polarizer (Figure 6; Top Polarizer 626). Peng does not expressly disclose a panel configured to present AR content, the panel comprising a first linear polarizer and a liquid crystal layer, and eyeglasses separated away from the panel. Kim discloses an apparatus (Figure 5; Head-Mounted Display Device 10) comprising a first linear polarizer (Figure 5; First Polarizing Layer 200) and a liquid crystal layer (Figure 5; Display Elements 120), and eyeglasses (Figure 5; Optical Unit 600) separated away from the panel (see Figure 5; wherein the optical unit 600 is separated away from the display elements 120 by adhesive layer 500). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant invention to modify the apparatus of Peng such that the panel configured to present AR content comprises a first linear polarizer and a liquid crystal layer, and eyeglasses separated away from the panel, as taught by Kim, because doing so would predictably ensure the polarization of the image displayed to a viewer is pure. Regarding Claim 2, Peng as modified by Kim further discloses the limitations of claim 1 as detailed above. Peng further discloses one lens of the eyeglasses (Figure 11; HMD 1100) comprises the second linear polarizer (see Figures 6 and 11; wherein the liquid crystal display panel 600 is inherently duplicated to ensure coverage for both the right and left eye of a user such that both would include a top polarizer 626 and a bottom polarizer 628). Regarding Claim 3, Peng as modified by Kim discloses the limitations of claim 2 as detailed above. Peng does not expressly disclose that the first linear polarizer and the second linear polarizer have a polarization difference between each other. Kim discloses an apparatus (Figure 5; Head-Mounted Display Device 10) comprising a first linear polarizer (Figure 5; First Polarizing Layer 200) and a second linear polarizer (Figure 5; Second Polarizing Layer 630), wherein the first linear polarizer (Figure 5; First Polarizing Layer 200) and the second linear polarizer (Figure 5; Second Polarizing Layer 630) have a polarization difference between each other (see Paragraphs [0037] and [0050]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant invention to modify the first and second linear polarizers of Peng such that the first linear polarizer and the second linear polarizer have a polarization difference between each other, as taught by Kim, because doing so would predictably ensure the polarization of the image displayed to a viewer is pure. Regarding Claim 4, Peng as modified by Kim discloses the limitations of claim 1 as detailed above. Peng further discloses one lens of the eyeglasses (Figure 11; HMD 1100) comprises the second linear polarizer (Figure 6; Top Polarizer 626), and another lens of the eyeglasses (Figure 11; HMD 1100) comprises a third linear polarizer (see Figures 6 and 11; wherein the liquid crystal display panel 600 is inherently duplicated to ensure coverage for both the right and left eye of a user such that both would include a top polarizer 626 and a bottom polarizer 628 wherein the top polarizer 626 in a left eye display is equivalent to the top polarizer in a right eye display); and the second linear polarizer (Figure 6; Top Polarizer 626) and the third linear polarizer have same polarization (see Figures 6 and 11; wherein the liquid crystal display panel 600 is inherently duplicated to ensure coverage for both the right and left eye of a user such that both would include a top polarizer 626 and a bottom polarizer 628 wherein the top polarizer 626 in a left eye display is equivalent to the top polarizer in a right eye display). Regarding Claim 5, Peng as modified by Kim discloses the limitations of claim 4 as detailed above. Peng does not expressly disclose that the first linear polarizer and the second linear polarizer have a polarization difference between each other. Kim discloses an apparatus (Figure 5; Head-Mounted Display Device 10) comprising a first linear polarizer (Figure 5; First Polarizing Layer 200) and a second linear polarizer (Figure 5; Second Polarizing Layer 630), wherein the first linear polarizer (Figure 5; First Polarizing Layer 200) and the second linear polarizer (Figure 5; Second Polarizing Layer 630) have a polarization difference between each other (see Paragraphs [0037] and [0050]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant invention to modify the first and second linear polarizers of Peng such that the first linear polarizer and the second linear polarizer have a polarization difference between each other, as taught by Kim, because doing so would predictably ensure the polarization of the image displayed to a viewer is pure. Regarding Claim 13, Peng as modified by Kim discloses the limitations of claim 12 as detailed above. Peng does not expressly disclose providing the eyeglasses to be separated away from the panel and configured to directly receive the modified polarized light further comprises: providing the eyeglasses with one of two lenses of the eyeglasses comprising the second linear polarizer. Kim discloses an apparatus (Figure 5; Head-Mounted Display Device 10) comprising a first linear polarizer (Figure 5; First Polarizing Layer 200) and a second linear polarizer (Figure 5; Second Polarizing Layer 630), wherein Providing the eyeglasses (Figure 5; Optical Unit 600) to be separated away from the panel (see Figure 5; wherein the optical unit 600 is separated away from the display elements 120 by adhesive layer 500) and configured to directly receive the modified polarized light (see Figure 5) further comprises: providing the eyeglasses (Figure 5; Optical Unit 600) with one of two lenses of the eyeglasses (Figure 5; Optical Unit 600) comprising the second linear polarizer (Figure 5; Second Polarizing Layer 630). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant invention to modify the method of Peng to incorporate providing the eyeglasses to be separated away from the panel and configured to directly receive the modified polarized light further comprises: providing the eyeglasses with one of two lenses of the eyeglasses comprising the second linear polarizer, as taught by Kim, because doing so would predictably ensure the polarization of the image displayed to a viewer is pure. Regarding Claim 14, Peng as modified by Kim discloses the limitations of claim 13 as detailed above. Peng does not expressly disclose providing the eyeglasses to be separated away from the panel and configured to directly receive the modified polarized light further comprises: providing the eyeglasses with the second linear polarizer having a different polarization from the first linear polarizer. Kim discloses an apparatus (Figure 5; Head-Mounted Display Device 10) comprising a first linear polarizer (Figure 5; First Polarizing Layer 200) and a second linear polarizer (Figure 5; Second Polarizing Layer 630), wherein Providing the eyeglasses (Figure 5; Optical Unit 600) to be separated away from the panel (see Figure 5; wherein the optical unit 600 is separated away from the display elements 120 by adhesive layer 500) and configured to directly receive the modified polarized light (see Figure 5) further comprises: providing the eyeglasses (Figure 5; Optical Unit 600) with the second linear polarizer (Figure 5; Second Polarizing Layer 630) having a different polarization from the first linear polarizer (Figure 5; First Polarizing Layer 200) and the second linear polarizer (Figure 5; Second Polarizing Layer 630) have a polarization difference between each other (see Paragraphs [0037] and [0050]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant invention to modify the method of Peng to incorporate providing the eyeglasses to be separated away from the panel and configured to directly receive the modified polarized light further comprises: providing the eyeglasses with the second linear polarizer having a different polarization from the first linear polarizer, as taught by Kim, because doing so would predictably ensure the polarization of the image displayed to a viewer is pure. Regarding Claims 6 and 15, Peng as modified by Kim discloses the limitations of claims 1 and 12 as detailed above. Peng further discloses a color filter layer (Figure 6; Color Filter Layers 622) comprising color pixels aligned with the liquid crystal pixels in the liquid crystal layer (see Figure 6 and Paragraph [0060]). Regarding Claims 7 and 16, Peng as modified by Kim discloses the limitations of claims 1 and 12 as detailed above. Peng further discloses disposing the liquid crystal layer (Figure 6; LC Layer 620) and each pixel of the liquid crystal layer (Figure 6; LC Layer 620) is configured to modify the polarized light according to a control voltage applied on the pixel (see Paragraph [0060]; wherein the LC layer is described as a twisted nematic (TN) LC layer wherein twisted nematic LC layers inherently work by twisting the path of polarized light, acting as a light valve to control pixel brightness such that in the "off" state, the liquid crystal molecules twist light's polarization by 90°, allowing it to pass through a second polarizer to create a bright pixel and when a voltage is applied, the molecules untwist and align perpendicularly to the glass, preventing light from passing through the second polarizer and creating a dark pixel). Regarding Claims 9 and 18, Peng as modified by Kim discloses the limitations of claims 1 and 12 as detailed above. Peng further discloses at least one camera (Figure 11; Eye Tracking System 1114) configured to acquire at least one image of the user to obtain a face position of the user (see Paragraph [0069]-[0070]); and a controller configured to render the AR content based on the face position (see Paragraph [0067]-[0070]; wherein it is disclosed that a control means is used to provide user input and controls to the system and that position sensors 1112 track the position of the HMD 1100 and an eye tracking system 1114 determines the orientation and position of a user's eyes in real time). Regarding Claim 10, Peng as modified by Kim discloses the limitations of claim 9 as detailed above. Peng further discloses the controller is configured to perform stereo reconstruction of the face position with respect to the object (see Paragraph [0067]-[0071]; wherein it is disclosed that a control means is used to provide user input and controls to the system and that position sensors 1112 track the position of the HMD 1100 and an eye tracking system 1114 determines the orientation and position of a user's eyes in real time wherein an artificial reality system adjusts sensory information about outside world obtained through the senses such as visual information, audio, touch (somatosensation) information, acceleration, balance, etc., in some manner before presentation to a user); and the controller is configured to render the AR content based on the stereo reconstruction (see Paragraph [0067]-[0070]; wherein it is disclosed that a control means is used to provide user input and controls to the system and that position sensors 1112 track the position of the HMD 1100 and an eye tracking system 1114 determines the orientation and position of a user's eyes in real time). Regarding Claim 11, Peng as modified by Kim discloses the limitations of claim 10 as detailed above. Peng further discloses the controller is configured to render the AR content based on the stereo reconstruction (see Paragraph [0067]-[0070]; wherein it is disclosed that a control means is used to provide user input and controls to the system and that position sensors 1112 track the position of the HMD 1100 and an eye tracking system 1114 determines the orientation and position of a user's eyes in real time), the controller is configured to determine a subset of the liquid crystal pixels in the liquid crystal layer, on each of which a control voltage is applied (see Paragraphs [0067]-[0068]; wherein it is disclosed that the control means provides user input and controls to the system and controls a display system to augment views of a physical, real-world environment with computer-generated imagery, or to generate the entirely virtual 3D imagery). Regarding Claim 19, Peng discloses a system (Figure 10A; AR Display System 1000) for providing an augmented reality (AR) display (see Paragraph [0067]), the system (Figure 10A; AR Display System 1000) comprising: a panel (Figure 6; Liquid Crystal Display Panel 600) comprising: a first linear polarizer (Figure 6; Polarizer 628) configured to allow light from an object to transmit through as a polarized light (see Paragraph [0065]; wherein it is disclosed that the backlights and displays of this disclosure may be configured to at least partially transmit light); and a liquid crystal layer (Figure 6; LC Layer 620) disposed on the first linear polarizer (Figure 6; Polarizer 628) and at an opposite side with respect to the object (see Figure 6), the liquid crystal layer (Figure 6; LC Layer 620) comprising an array of liquid crystal pixels corresponding to AR content (see Abstract and Paragraph [0065]), each pixel configured to modify the polarized light (see Abstract and Paragraph [0065]); eyeglasses (Figure 11; HMD 1100) worn by a user and configured to directly receive the modified polarized light (see Paragraph [0067]), at least one lens of the eyeglasses (Figure 11; HMD 1100) comprising a second linear polarizer (Figure 6; Top Polarizer 626); at least one camera (Figure 11; Eye Tracking System 1114) configured to acquire at least one image of the user to obtain a face position of the user (see Paragraph [0069]-[0070]); and a controller configured to render the AR content based on the face position (see Paragraph [0067]-[0070]; wherein it is disclosed that a control means is used to provide user input and controls to the system and that position sensors 1112 track the position of the HMD 1100 and an eye tracking system 1114 determines the orientation and position of a user's eyes in real time). Peng does not expressly disclose a panel configured to present AR content, the panel comprising a first linear polarizer and a liquid crystal layer, and eyeglasses separated away from the panel. Kim discloses an apparatus (Figure 5; Head-Mounted Display Device 10) comprising a first linear polarizer (Figure 5; First Polarizing Layer 200) and a liquid crystal layer (Figure 5; Display Elements 120), and eyeglasses (Figure 5; Optical Unit 600) separated away from the panel (see Figure 5; wherein the optical unit 600 is separated away from the display elements 120 by adhesive layer 500). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant invention to modify the apparatus of Peng such that the panel configured to present AR content comprises a first linear polarizer and a liquid crystal layer, and eyeglasses separated away from the panel, as taught by Kim, because doing so would predictably ensure the polarization of the image displayed to a viewer is pure. Regarding Claim 20, Peng as modified by Kim discloses the limitations of claim 19 as detailed above. Peng further discloses the controller is configured to perform stereo reconstruction of the face position with respect to the object (see Paragraph [0067]-[0071]; wherein it is disclosed that a control means is used to provide user input and controls to the system and that position sensors 1112 track the position of the HMD 1100 and an eye tracking system 1114 determines the orientation and position of a user's eyes in real time wherein an artificial reality system adjusts sensory information about outside world obtained through the senses such as visual information, audio, touch (somatosensation) information, acceleration, balance, etc., in some manner before presentation to a user); and the controller is configured to render the AR content based on the stereo reconstruction (see Paragraph [0067]-[0070]; wherein it is disclosed that a control means is used to provide user input and controls to the system and that position sensors 1112 track the position of the HMD 1100 and an eye tracking system 1114 determines the orientation and position of a user's eyes in real time). Claims 8 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Peng et al (US 2022/0179147; hereinafter referred to as Peng) as modified by Kim et al (US 2019/0086671; hereinafter referred to as Kim) as applied to claims 7 and 16, in view of Ryu et al (US 2020/0142254; hereinafter referred to as Ryu). Regarding Claims 8 and 17, Peng as modified by Kim discloses the limitations of claims 7 and 16 as detailed above. Peng does not expressly disclose that in response to the control voltage applied on the pixel being non-zero, the pixel of the liquid crystal layer is configured to change a polarization state of the polarized light to an elliptical polarized state; and in response to the control voltage applied on the pixel being zero, the pixel of the liquid crystal layer is configured to maintain the polarization state of the polarized light. Ryu discloses an apparatus (Figure 3A and 3B) comprising a liquid crystal layer (Figures 3A and 3B; Liquid Crystal Layer 302), wherein in response to the control voltage applied on the pixel being non-zero, the pixel of the liquid crystal layer (Figures 3A and 3B; Liquid Crystal Layer 302) is configured to change a polarization state of the polarized light to an elliptical polarized state (see Paragraph [0054]; wherein it is disclosed that in the first mode, the transparent display is turned on and emits light, and liquid crystal molecules in the switchable λ/4 retarder 310 change a linearly polarized state (i.e., the p-state or the s-state) to a circularly polarized state (i.e., the LHCP or RHCP state)); and in response to the control voltage applied on the pixel being zero, the pixel of the liquid crystal layer (Figures 3A and 3B; Liquid Crystal Layer 302) is configured to maintain the polarization state of the polarized light (see Paragraph [0054]; wherein it is disclosed that in the second mode, the transparent display is turned off, and the liquid crystal molecules in the switchable λ/4 retarder 310 are aligned to deliver ambient light passing through the transparent display to the eyes of the user without reflection). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant invention to modify the apparatus of Peng as modified by Kim such that the control voltage applied on the pixel being non-zero, the pixel of the liquid crystal layer is configured to change a polarization state of the polarized light to an elliptical polarized state; and in response to the control voltage applied on the pixel being zero, the pixel of the liquid crystal layer is configured to maintain the polarization state of the polarized light, as taught by Ryu, because doing so would allow the user to alternately view an ambient scene and an image displayed on the display (see Ryu Paragraph [0054]). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER A LAMB II whose telephone number is (571)270-0648. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10am - 5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minh-Toan Ton can be reached at (571) 272-2303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER A LAMB II/Examiner, Art Unit 2882
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 16, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 29, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 04, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12613427
NEAR-EYE LIGHT-FIELD DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DISPLAYING LIGHT FIELD
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12601966
WAVELENGTH CONVERSION MODULE AND PROJECTOR
4y 4m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594904
Mirror Assemblies for Vehicles Including an Anti-Theft Countermeasure
4y 2m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596251
OPTICAL DEVICE FOR EXIT PUPIL EXPANSION (EPE) AND DISPLAY APPARATUS INCLUDING THE OPTICAL DEVICE
4y 2m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596207
Arrangement for Reflection Suppression in a Windscreen Display System, and Windscreen Display System
3y 4m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+15.4%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 479 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month