Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/211,455

SUBSTRATE PROCESS FLOW FOR ENABLING SUBSTRATE TO DIE HYBRID BONDING

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 19, 2023
Examiner
GEBREMARIAM, SAMUEL A
Art Unit
2811
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
708 granted / 850 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
868
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
38.2%
-1.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 850 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status Election/Restrictions The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 7-19 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 8/12/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, it is not clear what the structural relationship is between “a pad” as recited in line 7 of claim 7 and “the first pad” as recited in line 7 of claim 1. Regarding claim 20, the limitation “the screen” is unclear how it is related the rest of claim 20. Furthermore, there is nothing in the drawing or the specification to allow one to decipher what the screen is. For the rejection the limitation “screen” will not be considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yu et al., US 20220157785. Regarding claim 1, as best the examiner is able to ascertain the claimed invention, Yu discloses (fig. 7 and related text) a semiconductor assembly (170) comprising: a component (102); a semiconductor die (150, [0011]) having a semiconductor die pad (156’); and a hybrid bond (108, [0017]) connecting the semiconductor die (150) to a substrate (102), wherein the hybrid bond comprises: a via (160) that comprises a metal (164); a pad (114) that comprises a metal [0022] at a first end of the via (bottom of 160), the pad (114) bonded to the semiconductor die pad (156’); a dielectric layer (154) surrounding the pad (156’), the dielectric layer (154) bonded to the semiconductor die (150) around the semiconductor die pad (156’, fig. 7); and a second pad (106’) that comprises a metal [0016] at a second end of the via (fig. 7), the second pad (106’) bonded to the component (102/104). Regarding claim 2, Yu discloses a dielectric material (158) surrounding the via (portion of the via where 114 is). Regarding claim 3, Yu discloses the via (162/164), the pad (114), and the second pad (106’) comprise copper ([0014], [0021] and [0022]). Regarding claim 4, Yu discloses the dielectric layer comprises silicon oxide [0014]. Regarding claim 5, Yu discloses the component (102) comprises a substrate [0013]. Regarding claim 6, Yu discloses the component (102/104) comprises an interconnect ([0014]). Regarding claim 20, as best the examiner is able to the ascertain the claimed invention, Yu discloses (fig. 7 and related text) a device (170) comprising: a component (104); a semiconductor die (150, [0011]) having a semiconductor die pad (156’); and a hybrid bond (108, [0017]) connecting the semiconductor die (150) to a substrate (102), wherein the hybrid bond (108) comprises: a via (110/160) that comprises a metal (164); a first pad (114) that comprises a metal [0022] at a first end of the via (bottom of 160), the first pad (114) bonded to the semiconductor die pad (156’); a dielectric layer (154) surrounding the first metal pad (114), the dielectric layer (154) bonded to the semiconductor die (150) around the semiconductor die pad (156’); and second pad (106’) that comprises a metal [0017] at a second end of the via (fig. 7), the second pad (106’) bonded to the component (104). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMUEL A GEBREMARIAM whose telephone number is (571)272-1653. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lynne Gurley can be reached at 571-272-1670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMUEL A GEBREMARIAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2811
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 19, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 18, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772750
OPTIMIZED PHASE CHANGE MEMORY STRUCTURE TO IMPROVE NUCLEATION TIME VARIATION
4y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772591
BOND STRUCTURES HAVING SHIELDING STRUCTURES FOR STACKED CHIPS
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759867
MEMS Structure with Reduced Peeling and Methods Forming the Same
3y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12765205
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12753067
MEMS STRUCTURE INCLUDING A BURIED CAVITY WITH ANTISTICTION PROTUBERANCES, AND MANUFACTURING METHODS THEREOF
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 850 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month