Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/213,077

POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Jun 22, 2023
Examiner
KESSIE, DANIEL
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Delta Electronics Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
418 granted / 685 resolved
-7.0% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
75 currently pending
Career history
760
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.2%
+13.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 685 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1 and 13 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The claims are amended to include when the main load unit operates normally at an operating voltage, the main load unit receives the supply voltage from the power supply directly without passing through the bypass unit. However, there is no support in the specs for the amendment. Applicant is to provide paragraphs which teaches the amendment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5-14, 17-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Pabon (US 2011/0057724). Re Claims 1 and 13; Pabon discloses A power supply system (Fig. 6), comprising: a power supply (602 and 604 and 606), configured to provide an adjustable supply voltage; (Par 0078) a power receiving system, (power cables) electrically connected to the power supply through a port for receiving the supply voltage. (Fig. 6) a main load unit (603), electrically connected to the power supply for receiving the supply voltage; a DC-DC voltage conversion unit (608a), electrically connected to the power supply (Fig. 6); a bypass unit (650A), electrically connected to the power supply; and a controller (604) at least one sub-load unit, (Not shown but would be coupled to 614B-N) electrically connected to the DC-DC voltage conversion unit and the bypass unit, (Fig 6) wherein when the main load unit stops operating, the controller provides the power supply with a signal reflecting a required voltage of the sub-load unit, the power supply adjusts the supply voltage to be equal to the required voltage (Par 0046, 79,81, the controller actively monitors the operation of the load and controllers the power to the load accordingly) and provides the adjusted supply voltage to the sub-load unit through the bypass unit. (Par 0078-79, because the sensing nature of the circuit, the controller determines when the load is not present and disable the switch) and when the main load unit operates normally (first range) at an operating voltage, the main load unit receives the supply voltage from the power supply directly without passing through the bypass unit. (Par 0077 and 95) wherein the controller determines whether the main load unit is operating according to an output current of the power supply. (Par 0078, 81) Re Claims 5 and 17; Pabon discloses wherein when the main load unit operates, the supply voltage is converted by the DC-DC voltage conversion unit and then provided to the at least one sub-load unit. (Par 0078, 81 and Fig. 6) Re Claims 6 and 18; Pabon discloses comprising N power modules and a plurality of said sub-load units, wherein N is an integer larger than 1, each of the N power modules comprises one said DC-DC voltage conversion unit and one said bypass unit, the first power module is electrically connected to the power supply, the first through Nth power modules are electrically connected in series sequentially, the plurality of sub- load units forms N sub-load unit assemblies each comprising at least one sub-load unit, the at least one sub-load unit of the first sub-load unit assembly is electrically connected to the power supply through the first power module, and the at least one sub-load unit of the (n+1)th sub-load unit assembly is electrically connected to the power supply through the first to (n+1)th power modules, where n is an integer larger than or equal to 1 and smaller than N. (Fig. 6) Re Claim 7 and 19; Pabon discloses wherein in each of the N power modules, when a voltage received by the power module is equal to a required voltage of the sub-load unit connected to the power module, the voltage received by the power module is provided through the bypass unit of the power module to the sub-load unit connected to the power module. (Fig. 6) Re Claim 8 and 20; Pabon discloses wherein in each of the N power modules, when a voltage received by the power module is not equal to a required voltage of the sub-load unit connected to the power module, the voltage received by the power module is converted by the DC-DC voltage conversion unit of the power module and then provided to the sub-load unit connected to the power module. (Par 0078, 81) Re Claim 9 and 21; Pabon discloses wherein when a voltage received by the nth power module is equal to a required voltage of the sub- load unit of the nth sub-load unit assembly connected to the nth power module, the voltage received by the nth power module is provided through the bypass unit of the nth power module to the sub-load unit of the nth sub- load unit assembly and the (n+1)th power module. (Fig. 6) Re Claim 10 and 22; Pabon discloses wherein when a voltage received by the nth power module is not equal to a required voltage of the sub-load unit of the nth sub-load unit assembly connected to the nth power module, the voltage received by the nth power module is converted by the DC-DC voltage conversion unit of the nth power module and then provided to the sub-load unit of the nth sub-load unit assembly and the (n+1)th power module. (Par 0078, 81) Re Claims 11 and 23; Pabon discloses further comprising a controller, wherein when the main load unit stops operating, the controller provides the power supply with a signal reflecting required voltages of the plurality of sub-load units, the power supply adjusts the supply voltage according to the required voltages of the plurality of sub-load units. (Par 0078, 81) Re Claim 12 and 24; Pabon discloses further comprising a controller, wherein when the main load unit and a part of the sub-load units stop operating, the controller provides the power supply with a signal reflecting required voltages of the other operational sub-load units, the power supply adjusts the supply voltage to be equal to a highest one of the required voltages of the other operational sub-load units. (Par 0078, 81) Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 06/18/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant asserts that Pabon does not disclose a direct electrical connection between the power supply and the client device. However, the Figs show that in Pabon’s high‑power state (as described in ¶[0007]), switch 650A is enabled, and the output of AC/DC converter 606 is provided to the client device 603. The AC/DC converter 606 is the power supply in Pabon’s architecture. A switch in the path does not negate a “direct electrical connection,” as the claims do not exclude switching elements. Thus, Pabon teaches a configuration in which the client device receives the supply voltage directly from the power supply during normal operation. The applicant argues that Pabon always uses a bypass unit or switching module in the power path. However, the Fig show that bypass unit 618 is only used in certain modes. In the high‑power state, Pabon explicitly disables the DC/DC converter output and enables switch 650A, bypassing the bypass unit entirely. This satisfies the claim requirement that no bypass unit is used in the power transmission path during normal operation. The applicant argues that ¶[0007] shows that Pabon always uses converter 606 or 606B. However, ¶[0007] describes two distinct modes: High‑power state: Switch 650A is enabled; DC/DC converter output is disabled. Power flows directly from AC/DC converter 606 to the client device. Low‑power state: Switch 650A is disabled; DC/DC converter output is enabled. The high‑power state corresponds to normal operation of the client device. In that state, Pabon teaches the same “direct connection” the applicant claims is missing. The applicant argues that Pabon’s controller does not determine operation based on output current. However, the images show that controller 604 determines whether the client device is in a high‑power or low‑power state. Determining power state inherently involves evaluating load conditions, including current drawn from the power supply. A person of ordinary skill would understand that monitoring load current is a standard method for determining operating state. Thus, Pabon teaches or suggests the claimed controller behavior. The applicant asserts that Pabon always interposes switching or conversion circuitry between the power supply and the client device. However, the claims do not exclude switching elements. They only require that the main load unit receives the supply voltage directly during normal operation. The Fig show that Pabon’s high‑power state meets this requirement. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL KESSIE whose telephone number is (571)272-4449. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pmEst. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached on (571) 272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL KESSIE/ 02/05/2026 Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 22, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 30, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Dec 03, 2024
Response Filed
Mar 24, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §112
Jun 18, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Nov 06, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 06, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 21, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603518
REDUNDANT POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597794
Battery Charging Method, Electronic Apparatus, Storage Medium, and Program Product
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597797
POWER FEEDING DEVICE, POWER FEEDING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587026
DYNAMICALLY SELECTABLE POWER AND CHARGING CONFIGURATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587043
POWER FEED SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+25.0%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 685 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month