Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/213,341

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD, TERMINAL DEVICE AND NETWORK DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 23, 2023
Priority
Dec 29, 2020 — continuation of PCTCN2020141051
Examiner
IM, THEODORE
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
9 granted / 15 resolved
+2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
57
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
75.2%
+35.2% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 15 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/15/2026 has been placed in the record and considered by the examiner. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-6,8-15 and 17-22 have been considered but are moot in view of new grounds of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6,8-15 and 17-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rico Alvarino et al. (US 2019/0246244 A1; from IDS hereinafter "Rico"), in view of KIM et al. (US 2015/0327269 A1; hereinafter “KIM”). Regarding claim 1, Rico teaches a terminal device (FIG. 3 UE 120), comprising a processor and a memory ([0007] memory and processor), wherein the memory is configured to store a computer program, and the processor is configured to invoke and execute the computer program stored in the memory to perform operations ([0008] store instructions for wireless communication. when executed by one or more processors of a UE, causes the one or more processor) comprising: transmitting, by the terminal device (FIG. 3 UE 120), first information to a network device (FIG. 3 BS 110) ([0060] In FIG. 3 reference number 340, the UE 120 transmits information identifying the capability), the first information being used to determine a maximum bandwidth capability supported by the terminal device ([0060] The information identifying the capability is shown by FIG. 3 reference number 350. As shown, the information identifying the capability identifies the maximum bandwidth); wherein the first information comprises at least one of: maximum bandwidth capability information of the terminal device on each of at least one frequency band ([0060] the UE capability information identifies a maximum bandwidth, such as 100 MHz at a 15-KHz numerology, for each of multiple, different frequency bands). However, Rico does not teach wherein the maximum bandwidth capability information of the terminal device on a second frequency band comprises a plurality of sets of maximum bandwidth capability information, and each set of maximum bandwidth capability information corresponds to at least one frequency band combination comprising the second frequency band. In an analogous art, KIM teaches wherein the maximum bandwidth capability information of the terminal device on a second frequency band comprises a plurality of sets of maximum bandwidth capability information ([0060]-[0064] the UE reports capability information including supported frequency-band combinations and maximum bandwidths for the frequency bands, [0154] multiple BCPs correspond to combinations [1+2], [1+3], and [1+2+3], each including Band 1, i.e., the second frequency band), and each set of maximum bandwidth capability information corresponds to at least one frequency band combination comprising the second frequency band ([0075] each band-combination information element represents a respective supported carrier-aggregation combination, [0154] the respective BCPs correspond to band combinations [1+2], [1+3], and [1+2+3], each comprising Band 1, i.e., the second frequency band). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify a capability information as taught by KIM within the system of Rico. One would have been motivated to do so in order to enhance carrier aggregation support, thereby improving system efficiency (KIM [0045]). Regarding claim 2, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically Rico teaches wherein the first information further comprises at least one of: at least one piece of maximum bandwidth capability information ([0060] In FIG. 3 reference number 350, the information identifying the capability may identify the maximum bandwidth (e.g., 100 MHz at 15 kHz numerology)); all bandwidths supportable by the terminal device; or indication information indicating whether the terminal device supports all bandwidths. Regarding claim 3, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically Rico teaches wherein the at least one piece of maximum bandwidth capability information (FIG. 3 reference number 350) comprises maximum bandwidth capability information corresponding to each of at least one Sub-Carrier Spacing (SCS) ([0049] In FIG. 3 reference number 310, a UE 120 is associated with carriers having subcarrier spacings of 15 kHz, 7.5 kHz, and 1.25 kHz, [0060] identify the maximum bandwidth (e.g., 100 MHz at 15 kHz numerology) the scaling factors associated with the 7.5 kHz numerology and the 1.25 kHz numerology). Regarding claim 4, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically Rico teaches wherein the at least one piece of maximum bandwidth capability information (FIG. 3 reference number 350) ([0050] The maximum bandwidth capability is based at least a radio frequency (RF) throughput capability of the UE 120) comprises maximum uplink bandwidth capability information ([0040] On the uplink, at UE 120, a transmit processor 264 receives and process data and transmitted to BS 110. At BS 110, the uplink signals from UE 120 are processed to obtain decoded data and control information sent by UE 120) and/or maximum downlink bandwidth capability information ([0039] At UE 120, antennas 252a through 252r receives the downlink signals from BS 110, A receive processor 258 provides decoded data for UE 120 to a data sink 260, and decoded control information). Regarding claim 5, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically KIM teaches wherein the first information further comprises: all bandwidths supportable by the terminal device on each of the at least one frequency band ([0064] the UE reports maximum bandwidths for frequency bands, [0071]-[0072] the capability information identifies the bandwidth classes supported in each frequency band and indicates that all combinations of the recorded bandwidth classes are supported by the UE). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify a capability information as taught by KIM within the system of Rico. One would have been motivated to do so in order to enhance carrier aggregation support, thereby improving system efficiency (KIM [0045]). Regarding claim 6, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically Rico teaches wherein the maximum bandwidth capability information (FIG. 3 reference number 350) of the terminal device on each frequency band comprises at least one piece of maximum bandwidth capability information each corresponding to one SCS ([0049] In FIG. 3, a UE 120 is associated with carriers having subcarrier spacings of 15 kHz, 7.5 kHz, and 1.25 kHz, [0060] the information identifying the capability may identify the maximum bandwidth (e.g., 100 MHz at 15 kHz numerology)). Regarding claim 8, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically Rico teaches wherein the first information further comprises maximum bandwidth capability information supported by the terminal device in at least one operation state ([0041] Controller/processor 240 of BS 110, controller/processor 280 of UE 120, and/or any other component(s) of FIG. 2 performs one or more techniques associated with carrier capability signaling with regard to multiple carrier numerologies, [0060] the information identifying the capability identifies the maximum bandwidth (e.g., 100 MHz at 15 kHz numerology)). Regarding claim 9, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically Rico teaches wherein the operation state comprises a Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) operation state ([0039] A MIMO detector 256 may obtain received symbols from all R demodulators 254a through 254r, perform MIMO detection on the received symbols if applicable). Regarding claim 10, Rico teaches a network device (FIG. 3 BS 110), comprising a processor and a memory ([0011] memory and processor), wherein the memory is configured to store a computer program, and the processor is configured to invoke and execute the computer program stored in the memory to perform operations ([0012] store instructions for wireless communication. when executed by one or more processors of a UE, causes the one or more processor) comprising: receiving, by the network device (FIG. 3 BS 110), first information transmitted by a terminal device (FIG. 3 UE 120) ([0060] In FIG. 3 reference number 340, the BS 110 receives information identifying the capability), the first information being used to determine a maximum bandwidth capability supported by the terminal device ([0060] The information identifying the capability is shown by FIG. 3 reference number 350. As shown, the information identifying the capability identifies the maximum bandwidth) ); wherein the first information comprises at least one of: maximum bandwidth capability information of the terminal device on each of at least one frequency band ([0060] the UE capability information identifies a maximum bandwidth, such as 100 MHz at a 15-KHz numerology, for each of multiple, different frequency bands). However, Rico does not teach wherein the maximum bandwidth capability information of the terminal device on a second frequency band comprises a plurality of sets of maximum bandwidth capability information, and each set of maximum bandwidth capability information corresponds to at least one frequency band combination comprising the second frequency band. In an analogous art, KIM teaches wherein the maximum bandwidth capability information of the terminal device on a second frequency band comprises a plurality of sets of maximum bandwidth capability information ([0060]-[0064] the UE reports capability information including supported frequency-band combinations and maximum bandwidths for the frequency bands, [0154] multiple BCPs correspond to combinations [1+2], [1+3], and [1+2+3], each including Band 1, i.e., the second frequency band), and each set of maximum bandwidth capability information corresponds to at least one frequency band combination comprising the second frequency band ([0075] each band-combination information element represents a respective supported carrier-aggregation combination, [0154] the respective BCPs correspond to band combinations [1+2], [1+3], and [1+2+3], each comprising Band 1, i.e., the second frequency band). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify a capability information as taught by KIM within the system of Rico. One would have been motivated to do so in order to enhance carrier aggregation support, thereby improving system efficiency (KIM [0045]). Regarding claim 11, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically Rico teaches wherein the first information further comprises at least one of: at least one piece of maximum bandwidth capability information ([0060] In FIG. 3 reference number 350, the information identifying the capability may identify the maximum bandwidth (e.g., 100 MHz at 15 kHz numerology)); all bandwidths supportable by the terminal device; and indication information indicating whether the terminal device supports all bandwidths. Regarding claim 12, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically Rico teaches wherein the at least one piece of maximum bandwidth capability information (FIG. 3 reference number 350) comprises maximum bandwidth capability information corresponding to each of at least one Sub-Carrier Spacing (SCS) ([0049] In FIG. 3 reference number 310, a UE 120 is associated with carriers having subcarrier spacings of 15 kHz, 7.5 kHz, and 1.25 kHz, [0060] identify the maximum bandwidth (e.g., 100 MHz at 15 kHz numerology) the scaling factors associated with the 7.5 kHz numerology and the 1.25 kHz numerology). Regarding claim 13, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically Rico teaches wherein the at least one piece of maximum bandwidth capability information (FIG. 3 reference number 350) ([0050] The maximum bandwidth capability is based at least a radio frequency (RF) throughput capability of the UE 120) comprises maximum uplink bandwidth capability information ([0040] On the uplink, at UE 120, a transmit processor 264 receives and process data and transmitted to BS 110. At BS 110, the uplink signals from UE 120 are processed to obtain decoded data and control information sent by UE 120) and/or maximum downlink bandwidth capability information ([0039] At UE 120, antennas 252a through 252r receives the downlink signals from BS 110, A receive processor 258 provides decoded data for UE 120 to a data sink 260, and decoded control information). Regarding claim 14, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically KIM teaches wherein the first information further comprises all bandwidths supportable by the terminal device on each of the at least one frequency band ([0064] the UE reports maximum bandwidths for frequency bands, [0071]-[0072] the capability information identifies the bandwidth classes supported in each frequency band and indicates that all combinations of the recorded bandwidth classes are supported by the UE). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify a capability information as taught by KIM within the system of Rico. One would have been motivated to do so in order to enhance carrier aggregation support, thereby improving system efficiency (KIM [0045]). Regarding claim 15, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically Rico teaches wherein the maximum bandwidth capability information (FIG. 3 reference number 350) of the terminal device on each frequency band comprises at least one piece of maximum bandwidth capability information each corresponding to one SCS ([0049] In FIG. 3, a UE 120 is associated with carriers having subcarrier spacings of 15 kHz, 7.5 kHz, and 1.25 kHz, [0060] the information identifying the capability may identify the maximum bandwidth (e.g., 100 MHz at 15 kHz numerology)). Regarding claim 17, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically Rico teaches wherein the first information further comprises maximum bandwidth capability information supported by the terminal device in at least one operation state ([0041] Controller/processor 240 of BS 110, controller/processor 280 of UE 120, and/or any other component(s) of FIG. 2 performs one or more techniques associated with carrier capability signaling with regard to multiple carrier numerologies, [0060] the information identifying the capability identifies the maximum bandwidth (e.g., 100 MHz at 15 kHz numerology)). Regarding claim 18, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically Rico teaches wherein the operation state comprises a Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) operation state ([0039] A MIMO detector 256 may obtain received symbols from all R demodulators 254a through 254r, perform MIMO detection on the received symbols if applicable). Regarding claim 19, Rico teaches a wireless communication method (FIG. 3), comprising: receiving, by a network device (FIG. 3 BS 110), first information transmitted by a terminal device (FIG. 3 UE 120) ([0060] In FIG. 3 reference number 340, the BS 110 receives information identifying the capability), the first information being used to determine a maximum bandwidth capability supported by the terminal device ([0060] The information identifying the capability is shown by FIG. 3 reference number 350. As shown, the information identifying the capability identifies the maximum bandwidth); wherein the first information comprises at least one of: maximum bandwidth capability information of the terminal device on each of at least one frequency band ([0060] the UE capability information identifies a maximum bandwidth, such as 100 MHz at a 15-KHz numerology, for each of multiple, different frequency bands). However, Rico does not teach wherein the maximum bandwidth capability information of the terminal device on a second frequency band comprises a plurality of sets of maximum bandwidth capability information, and each set of maximum bandwidth capability information corresponds to at least one frequency band combination comprising the second frequency band. In an analogous art, KIM teaches wherein the maximum bandwidth capability information of the terminal device on a second frequency band comprises a plurality of sets of maximum bandwidth capability information ([0060]-[0064] the UE reports capability information including supported frequency-band combinations and maximum bandwidths for the frequency bands, [0154] multiple BCPs correspond to combinations [1+2], [1+3], and [1+2+3], each including Band 1, i.e., the second frequency band), and each set of maximum bandwidth capability information corresponds to at least one frequency band combination comprising the second frequency band ([0075] each band-combination information element represents a respective supported carrier-aggregation combination, [0154] the respective BCPs correspond to band combinations [1+2], [1+3], and [1+2+3], each comprising Band 1, i.e., the second frequency band). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify a capability information as taught by KIM within the system of Rico. One would have been motivated to do so in order to enhance carrier aggregation support, thereby improving system efficiency (KIM [0045]). Regarding claim 20, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically Rico teaches wherein the first information further comprises at least one of: at least one piece of maximum bandwidth capability information ([0060] In FIG. 3 reference number 350, the information identifying the capability may identify the maximum bandwidth (e.g., 100 MHz at 15 kHz numerology)). Regarding claim 21, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically KIM teaches wherein the first information further comprises maximum bandwidth capability information of the terminal device on each of at least one frequency band combination, each frequency band combination including at least two frequency bands ([0062] the UE reports supported frequency-band combinations, [0064] the capability information includes maximum bandwidths for the frequency bands, [0154] the reported BCPs correspond to combinations [1+2], [1+3], and [1+2+3], each including at least two frequency bands). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify a capability information as taught by KIM within the system of Rico. One would have been motivated to do so in order to enhance carrier aggregation support, thereby improving system efficiency (KIM [0045]). Regarding claim 22, the combination of Rico and KIM, specifically KIM teaches wherein the first information further comprises maximum bandwidth capability information of the terminal device on each of at least one frequency band combination, each frequency band combination including at least two frequency bands ([0062] the UE reports supported frequency-band combinations, [0064] the capability information includes maximum bandwidths for the frequency bands, [0154] the reported BCPs correspond to combinations [1+2], [1+3], and [1+2+3], each including at least two frequency bands). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify a capability information as taught by KIM within the system of Rico. One would have been motivated to do so in order to enhance carrier aggregation support, thereby improving system efficiency (KIM [0045]). Conclusion The following prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 2020/0120488 A1 (LIU et al.) discloses a communication method for bandwidth part switching, user equipment, a network device, and a communications system. US 2020/0045671 A1 (Hapsari et al.) discloses user equipment and a camping-on method. US 2023/0089990 A1 (FENG et al.) discloses a capability information reporting method and apparatus. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THEODORE IM whose telephone number is (571)270-1955. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9AM-5PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, UN C CHO can be reached on 571-272-7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.I./ Examiner, Art Unit 2413 /UN C CHO/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Nov 24, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 15, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12562794
CSI FEEDBACK METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 1m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12439446
WIRELESS TRANSMISSION SCHEDULING METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON UNRELIABLE NETWORK
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 2 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+30.0%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 15 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month