Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/214,833

BYPASS LINE INCLUDING A HYBRID CIRCUIT BREAKER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 27, 2023
Examiner
SHIN, JEFFREY M
Art Unit
2849
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Schneider Electric It Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
826 granted / 968 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
984
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 968 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/26/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-9, 11-17, 19-21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, and 30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Askan (Pub 2020/0185904) in view of Chen et al (Pub 2020/0389045, further referred to as Chen). As to claim 1, Askan teaches a power system with a bypass line (fig 1, (1)) for a power system coupled between an input of the power system (3) and an output of the power system (4), and configured to provide input AC power to an output of the power system, the bypass line comprising: a hybrid circuit breaker (1), the hybrid circuit breaker including: an electromechanical switch (8) configured to open at a first switching rate (paragraph 40), a solid-state switch (14) rated to open at a second switching rate that is slower than the first switching rate (paragraphs 41, (14) will open later than (8)), and a voltage suppression device (18); and a controller (9) coupled to the hybrid circuit breaker; wherein the controller is configured to: monitor the AC power input (paragraphs 38-40);and responsive to determination that the input AC power is unacceptable, operate the electromechanical switch to open (paragraphs 17 and 18) and operate the solid-state switch to close (controller will keep (14) closed as the controller will open it after (11) opens, paragraphs 21, 23, and 43) Askan does not teach using the AC/DC systems nor the bypass line bypassing the AC/DC converter. Chen teaches a power system (fig 1) having AC input power (10) input to a controllable bypass switch (80) (paragraphs 48 and 64) coupled between the input (from 10) and output (55) to bypass an AC/DC converter (20) As such it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to combine the switch taught in Askan with the bypass line taught in Chen in order to improve power supply safety. As to claim 2, Askan teaches wherein the solid-state switch comprises at least one transistor (paragraph 27). As to claim 3, Askan teaches wherein the at least one transistor incudes an insulated- gate bipolar transistor (paragraph 27). As to claim 4, Askan teaches wherein the voltage suppression device includes at least one varistor (paragraph 28). As to claim 5, Askan teaches wherein the voltage suppression device includes at least one varistor (paragraph 28). As to claim 7, Askan teaches wherein the controller is further configured to: operate the solid-state switch to open after a predetermined period of time has elapsed since opening the electromechanical switch (paragraphs 23, 40, and 41). As to claim 8, Askan teaches wherein the predetermined period of time is a time sufficient to avoid arcing in the hybrid circuit breaker (paragraphs 21 and 44). As to claim 9, Askan teaches wherein upon the electromechanical switch and solid-state switch opening, the voltage suppression device (18) is configured to absorb current in the bypass line (when open the current will pass to the varistor). As to claim 11, Askan teaches wherein the electromechanical switch, solid-state switch and voltage suppression device are coupled in parallel (paragraphs 17). As to claim 12, Askan wherein the controller is configured to operate the hybrid circuit breaker to limit current inrush from the input to the load (paragraphs 40-43, the controller controls the current inflow based on detected limiting current inrush). As to claim 13, Askan teaches a bypass line (fig 1, (1)) for a power system coupled between an input of the power system (3) and an output of the power system (4), and configured to provide input AC power to an output of the power system, the bypass line comprising: a hybrid circuit breaker (1), the hybrid circuit breaker including: an electromechanical switch (8) configured to open at a first switching rate (paragraph 40), a solid-state switch (14) rated to open at a second switching rate that is slower than the first switching rate (paragraphs 41, (14) will open later than (8)), and a voltage suppression device (18); and a controller (9) coupled to the hybrid circuit breaker; wherein the controller is configured to: monitor the AC power input (paragraphs 38-40);and responsive to determination that the input AC power is unacceptable, operate the electromechanical switch to open (paragraphs 17 and 18) and operate the solid-state switch to close (controller will keep (14) closed as the controller will open it after (11) opens, paragraphs 21, 23, and 43) Askan does not teach using the AC/DC systems nor the bypass line bypassing the AC/DC converter. Chen teaches a power system (fig 1) having AC input power (10) input to a controllable bypass switch (80) (paragraphs 48 and 64) coupled between the input (from 10) and output (55) to bypass an AC/DC converter (20) As such it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to combine the switch taught in Askan with the bypass line taught in Chen in order to improve power supply safety. As to claim 14, Askan teaches wherein the solid-state switch comprises at least one transistor (paragraph 27). As to claim 15, Askan teaches wherein the at least one transistor incudes an insulated- gate bipolar transistor (paragraph 27). As to claim 16, Askan teaches wherein the voltage suppression device includes at least one varistor (paragraph 28). As to claim 17, Askan teaches wherein the voltage suppression device includes at least one varistor (paragraph 28). As to claim 19, Askan teaches wherein the controller is further configured to: operate the solid-state switch to open after a predetermined period of time has elapsed since opening the electromechanical switch (paragraphs 23, 40, and 41). As to claim 20, Askan teaches wherein the predetermined period of time is a time sufficient to avoid arcing in the hybrid circuit breaker (paragraphs 21 and 44). As to claim 21, Askan teaches wherein upon the electromechanical switch and solid-state switch opening, the voltage suppression device (18) is configured to absorb current in the bypass line (when open the current will pass to the varistor). As to claim 23, Askan teaches wherein the electromechanical switch, solid-state switch and voltage suppression device are coupled in parallel (paragraphs 17). As to claim 24, Askan teaches a method of operating a power system with bypass line (fig 1, (1)) coupled between an input of the power system (3) and an output of the power system (4), and configured to provide input AC power to an output of the power system, the bypass line comprising: a hybrid circuit breaker (1), the hybrid circuit breaker including: an electromechanical switch (8) configured to open at a first switching rate (paragraph 40), a solid-state switch (14) rated to open at a second switching rate that is slower than the first switching rate (paragraphs 41, (14) will open later than (8)), and a voltage suppression device (18); and a controller (9) coupled to the hybrid circuit breaker; wherein the controller is configured to: monitor the AC power input (paragraphs 38-40); and responsive to determination that the input AC power is unacceptable, operate the electromechanical switch to open (paragraphs 17 and 18) and operate the solid-state switch to close (controller will keep (14) closed as the controller will open it after (11) opens, paragraphs 21, 23, and 43); and operating the solid-state switch to open after a predetermined time period as has elapsed since opening the electromechanical switch (paragraphs 23, 40, and 41) Askan does not teach using the AC/DC systems nor the bypass line bypassing the AC/DC converter. Chen teaches a power system (fig 1) having AC input power (10) input to a controllable bypass switch (80) (paragraphs 48 and 64) coupled between the input (from 10) and output (55) to bypass an AC/DC converter (20) As such it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to combine the switch taught in Askan with the bypass line taught in Chen in order to improve power supply safety. As to claim 26, Askan teaches wherein the predetermined period of time is a time sufficient to avoid arcing in the hybrid circuit breaker (paragraphs 21 and 44). As to claim 27, Askan teaches wherein upon the electromechanical switch and solid-state switch opening, the voltage suppression device (18) is configured to absorb current in the bypass line (when open the current will pass to the varistor). As to claim 29, Askan teaches wherein the electromechanical switch, solid-state switch and voltage suppression device are coupled in parallel (paragraphs 17). As to claim 30, Askan wherein the controller is configured to operate the hybrid circuit breaker to limit current inrush from the input to the load (paragraphs 40-43, the controller controls the current inflow based on detected limiting current inrush). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10, 22, and 28 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. None of the cited prior art teach or suggest utilize the Thomson effect to achieve the first switching rate as is recited in claims 10, 22, and 28. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEFFREY M SHIN whose telephone number is (571)270-7356. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-6pm PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Menatoallah Youssef can be reached at 571-270-3684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEFFREY M SHIN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2849
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 22, 2025
Interview Requested
Aug 29, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 29, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 04, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 15, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 15, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 27, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601147
WORK SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592534
Methods And Apparatus To Generate Macroscopic Fock And Other Sub-Poissonian States Of Radiation
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592582
Voltage Regulator Control in Electric Power Systems with Distributed Generation
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592667
VOLTAGE-CONTROLLED OSCILLATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580549
TORSIONAL MODE QUARTZ CRYSTAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.5%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 968 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month