Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/215,065

NOZZLE STRUCTURE AND SPRAY PIPE ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 27, 2023
Priority
Jul 05, 2022 — CN 202221718772.5
Examiner
GANEY, STEVEN J
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Shanghai Kohler Electronics Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1145 granted / 1392 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1409
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.8%
+10.8% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1392 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 11-26 in the reply filed on March 19, 2026 is acknowledged. In addition, applicant canceled claims 27-30, the Group II invention, and added new claims 31-34, which were further amended to align with the Group I invention. The examiner is in agreement and the restriction requirement has been vacated and an action as to the merits for claims 11-26 and 31-34 follows. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11, 12, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 7,992,805 B2(Chen). As to claim 11, Chen ‘805 discloses a nozzle structure comprising a main body comprising a cavity, see marked up Fig. 2; a front cover plate, see marked up Fig. 2, connected to a front end of the main body and comprising a plurality of spray holes 145, the plurality of spray holes spaced apart from each other and disposed on the front cover plate, see marked up Fig. 2, and Figs. 4A and 4B; a pipe body connected to a rear end of the main body and configured to be connected to a spray pipe, see marked up Fig. 1; wherein the plurality of the spray holes is distributed along a length direction of the front cover plate, see Fig. 4A. See Figs. 1-4B and col. 2, line 44 through col. 5, line 41. As to claim 12, where at least one spray hole of the plurality of sprays holes is obliquely disposed on the front cover, see Figs 2, 4A and 4B, and wherein at least one spray hole extends towards an edge of the front cover plate along a rear-to-front direction of the front cover plate, see Figs 2, 4A and 4B. As to claim 15, see guiding ramp in marked up Fig. 2. PNG media_image1.png 761 320 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 765 464 media_image2.png Greyscale Claims 11-15, 21, 22 and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 1,818,388 (Farley). As to claim 11, Farley ‘388 discloses a nozzle structure comprising a main body 6 comprising a cavity, see marked up Fig. 3; a front cover plate 28, see Figs. 2 and 3, connected to a front end of the main body and comprising a plurality of spray holes 31, the plurality of spray holes spaced apart from each other and disposed on the front cover plate, see Figs. 1-3; a pipe body 11 connected to a rear end of the main body at 27 and configured to be connected to a spray pipe 12, see Fig. 3; wherein the plurality of the spray holes is distributed along a length direction of the front cover plate, see Fig. 1. See Figs. 1-4 and page 1, line 35 through page 2, line 35. As to claim 12, where at least one spray hole of the plurality of sprays holes is obliquely disposed on the front cover, see Figs 2, and Fig. 3, and wherein at least one spray hole extends towards an edge of the front cover plate along a rear-to-front direction of the front cover plate, see Figs. 1 and 3. As to claim 13, see the length of the front cover plate 28 being greater than a width of the front cover plate and wherein the plurality of spray holes are substantially arranged in a straight or in a curved line, see Figs. 1 and 2. As to claim 14, see wherein a length, corresponding to the length of the front cover plate, of the cavity increases in a rear- to-front direction of the cavity, see Fig. 3. As to claim 15, see guiding ramp in marked up Fig. 3. As to claim 21, Farley ‘388 a spray pipe assembly comprising a nozzle structure comprising a main body 6 comprising a cavity, see marked up Fig. 3; a front cover plate 28, see Figs. 2 and 3, connected to a front end of the main body and comprising a plurality of spray holes 31, the plurality of spray holes spaced apart from each other and disposed on the front cover plate, see Figs. 1-3; a pipe body 11 connected to a rear end of the main body at 17 and a spray pipe 12 comprising a front end removably connected to a rear end of the pipe, see Fig. 4 and positioning pin 17; wherein the plurality of the spray holes is distributed along a length direction of the front cover plate, see Fig. 1. See Figs. 1-4 and page 1, line 35 through page 2, line 35. As to claim 22, see positioning pin 17 for the spray pipe 12 and wherein the positioning pin 17 is removably connected to an assembly mechanism 37 of the pipe body 11. As to claim 31, Farley ‘388 discloses a method for assembling a spray pipe assembly, the method comprising: connecting a front cover plate 28 to a front end of a main body 6 comprising a cavity, wherein the front cover plate comprises a plurality of spray holes 31, and the plurality of spray holes is spaced apart from each other, disposed on the front cover plate, and distributed along a length direction of the front cover plate, see Fig. 1; connecting a pipe body 11, configured to be connected to a spray pipe 12, to a rear end of the main body at 27; connecting at least one guiding ramp, see marked up Fig. 3, to at least one wall of the cavity so as to guide water to flow from the pipe body towards the plurality of spray holes disposed on the front cover plate; and connecting a front end at 36 of the spray pipe to a rear end at 37 of the pipe body via an assembly mechanism 37, wherein the assembly mechanism is disposed at the rear end of the pipe body and configured to be connected to a positioning pin 17 of the spray pipe. PNG media_image3.png 273 576 media_image3.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 7,992,805 B2(Chen). As to claim 21, Chen ‘805 discloses a spray pipe assembly comprising a nozzle structure comprising a main body comprising a cavity, see marked up Fig. 2; a front cover plate, see marked up Fig. 2, connected to a front end of the main body and comprising a plurality of spray holes 145, the plurality of spray holes spaced apart from each other and disposed on the front cover plate, see marked up Fig. 2, and Figs. 4A and 4B; a pipe body connected to a rear end of the main body and a spray pipe comprising a front end connected to a rear end of the pipe, see marked up Fig. 1; wherein the plurality of the spray holes is distributed along a length direction of the front cover plate, see Fig. 4A, except for a spray pipe comprising a front end removably connected to a rear end of the pipe, see marked up Fig. 1. See Figs. 1-4B and col. 2, line 44 through col. 5, line 41. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the spray pipe comprising a front end removably connected to a rear end of the pipe, since it has been held that a formerly integral structure in various elements involves only routine skill in the art. In re Dulberg, 289 F.2d 522, 523, 129 USPQ 348, 349 (CCPA 1961). See MPEP 2144.04.V.C. The apparatus of Chen ‘805 would perform equally as well if the spray pipe is connected or removably connected to the pipe and would facilitate maintenance and cleaning of the apparatus. PNG media_image1.png 761 320 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 765 464 media_image2.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-20, 23-26 and 32-34 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter for claims 16-20: The closest prior art being Chen ‘805 and Farley ‘388 did not separately or in combination teach or suggest a nozzle structure as claimed by the applicant, specifically a nozzle structure wherein a plurality of guiding ramps is disposed on the at least one wall of the cavity along a front-to- rear direction of the cavity, and wherein angles, with respect to a central axis of the pipe body, of two adjacent guiding ramps among the plurality of guiding ramps are different and a nozzle structure comprising an assembly mechanism disposed at a rear end of the pipe body and configured to be connected to a positioning pin of the spray pipe, wherein the assembly mechanism comprises a slot configured to be engaged with the positioning pin and comprises a guide groove configured to guide the positioning pin to slide towards the slot, wherein the guide groove is disposed at a rear end of the slot, and wherein the guide groove extends from the rear end of the pipe body to the slot, together in combination with the other claimed features of applicant’s invention. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter for claims 23-26: The closest prior art being Chen ‘805 and Farley ‘388 did not separately or in combination teach or suggest a spray pipe assembly as claimed by the applicant, specifically a spray pipe assembly wherein the assembly mechanism is disposed at the rear end of the pipe body, wherein the assembly mechanism comprises a slot configured to be engaged with the positioning pin and comprises a guide groove configured to guide the positioning pin to slide towards the slot, wherein the guide groove is disposed at a rear end of the slot, and wherein the guide groove extends from the rear end of the pipe body to the slot. , together in combination with the other claimed features of applicant’s invention. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter for claims 32-34: The closest prior art being Chen ‘805 and Farley ‘388 did not separately or in combination teach or suggest a method for assembling a spray pipe assembly as claimed by the applicant, specifically a method comprising the steps wherein connecting the at least one guiding ramp on the at least one wall of the cavity comprises: connecting a plurality of guiding ramps to the at least one wall of the cavity along a front-to-rear direction of the cavity; and tilting each of the plurality of guiding ramps at an angle with respect to a central axis of the pipe body, wherein angles, with respect to the central axis of the pipe body, of two adjacent guiding ramps among the plurality of guiding ramps are different, together in combination with the other method steps and claimed features of applicant’s invention. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Schaeffer ‘924 and Copeland ‘169 discloses a muzzle structure with a front cover plates with spray holes and Bowen ‘381 discloses a bidet with a front cover plate. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN J GANEY whose telephone number is (571)272-4899. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur Hall can be reached at (571)270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STEVEN J. GANEY Primary Examiner Art Unit 3752 /STEVEN J GANEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667211
MULTIPLE-USE DRINKING STRAWS AND THEIR PRODUCTION
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12643658
MODULAR SYSTEM FOR STORING AND JETTISONING FLUID AND AIRCRAFT PROVIDED WITH SUCH A SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12629703
SPRAY NOZZLE DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629712
ACCESSORY FOR SIDEWALL SPRINKLER HEAD
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12616859
METHOD OF AND SYSTEM FOR DEFENDING HOME BUILDING PROJECTS FROM WILDFIRE DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN A WILDFIRE URBAN INTERFACE (WUI) REGION
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+10.3%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1392 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month