Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/215,379

Data Demodulation Reference Signal Bundling

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 28, 2023
Examiner
ZAIDI, IQBAL
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Ofinno LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
1090 granted / 1207 resolved
+32.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1239
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.0%
+10.0% vs TC avg
§102
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1207 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The instant application having application No 18/215379 filed on 11/28/2025 is presented for examination by the examiner. Response to Argument Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-7, 8-13 and 15-19 have been considered. However, Examiner respectfully disagrees with Applicant’s arguments and would like to provide a further clarification regarding the interpretation of the cited references. In response to the argument on page 7 of Applicant’s Remark, “based on a demodulation reference signal (DM-RS) bundle is enabled for the first cell”. In fact, Examiner interprets the “the frame splitting determination engine configured to provide the segment splitting scheme to the peripheral device on the UWB channel or link between the devices in which the frames are sent to the peripheral device, the frame splitting determination engine configured to provide the segment splitting scheme to the peripheral device on a non-UWB channel, such as on a BLUETOOTH channel, a Wi-Fi channel, or other out-of-band (OOB) channel”. according to Ly’s disclosure. As stated in Ly’s – page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled, such that uplink DMRS bundling performed by UE, when the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the currently-received DCI indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled when the bit has a same value as the uplink DMRS bundling bit within a most recently received DCI. whereas the Examiner wants to provide further clarification of the cited claim limitation, whereas the Ly’s is directed to “page 12, par (0106), line 1-10, the UE 115-a may determine that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled, such that uplink DMRS bundling performed by the UE (wherein DMRS bundle enabled the first cell). Therefore, Examiner respectfully disagrees with Applicant's arguments. In response to the argument on page 6-7 of Applicant’s Remark, “receive one or more radio resource control (RRC) messages indicating that a cell group comprises a first cell and a second cell”. In fact, Examiner interprets the “user equipment (UE) control plane (RRC) protocol, the gNBs and the ng-eNB are connected to each other through Xn interfaces (wherein gNBs is a first cell and the ng-eNB is a second cell))”. according to Park’s disclosure. As stated in Park’s – page 3, par (0046), line 1-10, user equipment (UE) control plane (RRC) protocol, the gNBs and the ng-eNB are connected to each other through Xn interfaces (wherein gNBs is a first cell and the ng-eNB is a second cell)). whereas the Examiner wants to provide further clarification of the cited claim limitation, whereas the Park’s is directed to “page 7, par (0103-0104), line 1-20, UE in a serving cell; one or more UE-specific bandwidth parts configured for each UE through dedicated RRC signaling (wherein RRC message), and a default bandwidth part for a operation defined for each UE. It is possible to define simultaneously activating (wherein simultaneously activating serving cell which is first cell and destination cell which is second cell) and using a plurality of downlink and uplink bandwidth parts according to the capability of the UE and the configuration of the bandwidth parts in a serving cell. However, NR rel-15 defined activating and using only one downlink (DL) bandwidth part and one uplink (UL) bandwidth part at a time, UE and a BS set by activating a DL BWP for transmitting and receiving a PDCCH/PDSCH between the BS and the UE and activating a UL BWP for transmitting and receiving a PUCCH/PUSCH among the configured BWPs”. Therefore, Examiner respectfully disagrees with Applicant's arguments. In response to the argument on page 8-9 of Applicant’s Remark, “skip monitoring, during a time duration corresponding to the DM-RS bundle, downlink signals via the first cell of the cell group and the second cell of the cell group”. In fact, Examiner interprets the “mobile device ignores (skip monitoring) a received indication to adjust transmit power when the indication received during a duration in which uplink DMRS bundling has been scheduled, during a duration in which DMRSs have been scheduled to be transmitted using the same precoding matrix”. according to Ly’s disclosure. As stated in Ly’s – page 19, par (0163), line 1-20, mobile device ignores (skip monitoring) a received indication to adjust transmit power when the indication received during a duration in which uplink DMRS bundling has been scheduled, during a duration in which DMRSs have been scheduled to be transmitted using the same precoding matrix. whereas the Examiner wants to provide further clarification of the cited claim limitation, whereas the Park’s is directed to “page 13, par (0116), line 1-20, the UE ignore(skipping) the TPC command and maintain one or more of the phase continuity or other coherence properties, the UE maintain the phase continuity or other coherence properties associated with transmitting the PUSCH in one or more symbols, including symbols carrying the DMRSs across multiple slots(during the time duration), the UE continue bundling the DMRSs”. Therefore, Examiner respectfully disagrees with Applicant's arguments. Thus, Ly’s and Park’s disclosure still covers the limitations of claims 1-7, 8-13 and 15-19. Therefore, Examiner respectfully disagrees with Applicant's arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6, 8-13 and 15-19 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ly et al. (US 20210014095, Jan. 14, 2021) in view of Park (U.S 20220029859, Jan. 27, 2022). Regarding Claim 1, Ly discloses transmission based on a demodulation reference signal (DM-RS) bundle is enabled for the first cell and receive a downlink control information (DCI) scheduling, for the first cell, transmission of one or more repetitions of an uplink signal within the DM-RS bundle (page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled, such that uplink DMRS bundling performed by UE, when the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the currently-received DCI indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled when the bit has a same value as the uplink DMRS bundling bit within a most recently received DCI(DCI scheduling)); transmit the one or more repetitions within the DM-RS bundle (page 16, par (0135), line 10-20, the base station transmit an indication of the DMRS bundling configuration based on MCS, a timing gap between the physical shared channel symbols, a quantity of repetitions of physical shared channels); and skip monitoring, during a time duration corresponding to the DM-RS bundle, downlink signals via the first cell of the cell group and the second cell of the cell group (page 19, par (0163), line 1-20, mobile device ignores(skip monitoring) a received indication to adjust transmit power when the indication received during a duration in which uplink DMRS bundling has been scheduled, during a duration in which DMRSs have been scheduled to be transmitted using the same precoding matrix). Ly discloses all aspects of the claimed invention, except wireless device comprising one or more processors; and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the wireless device to receive one or more radio resource control (RRC) messages indicating that a cell group comprises a first cell and a second cell. Park is the same field of invention teaches wireless device comprising one or more processors; and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the wireless device to receive one or more radio resource control (RRC) messages indicating that a cell group comprises a first cell and a second cell (page 3, par (0046), line 1-10, user equipment (UE) control plane (RRC) protocol, the gNBs and the ng-eNB are connected to each other through Xn interfaces (wherein gNBs is a first cell and the ng-eNB is a a second cell)). Ly and Park analogous art because they are from the same field of endeavor of access to a service device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the wireless device to receive one or more radio resource control (RRC) messages indicating that a cell group comprises a first cell and a second cell teaching of Ly to include the user equipment (UE) control plane (RRC) protocol, the gNBs and the ng-eNB are connected to each other through Xn interfaces teaching of Park because it is providing improving the uplink coverage of the UE in the NR system, in particular, the transmission coverage of PUSCH and PUCCH, which are uplink radio data channels and radio control channels. Regarding Claim 2, Bedekar discloses the instructions further cause the wireless device to transmit at least two DM-RSs via the one or more repetitions(page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled, such that uplink DMRS bundling performed by UE, when the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI). Regarding Claim 3, Bedekar discloses the instructions further cause the wireless device to use a same DM-RS sequence for the one or more repetitions in the DM-RS bundle(page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the currently-received DCI indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled when the bit has a same value as the uplink DMRS bundling bit within a most recently received DCI(DCI scheduling)). Regarding Claim 4, Bedekar discloses the one or more RRC messages further indicate a number of repetitions in the DM-RS bundle(page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled, such that uplink DMRS bundling performed by UE, when the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the currently-received DCI indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled). Regarding Claim 5, Bedekar discloses the DCI further indicates a number of repetitions of the uplink signal across one or more DM-RS bundles(page 16, par (0135), line 10-20, the base station transmit an indication of the DMRS bundling configuration based on MCS, a timing gap between the physical shared channel symbols, a quantity of repetitions of physical shared channels). Regarding Claim 6, Bedekar discloses the time duration comprises one or more slots (page 19, par (0163), line 1-20, mobile device ignores (skip monitoring) a received indication to adjust transmit power when the indication received during a duration in which uplink DMRS bundling has been scheduled, during a duration in which DMRSs have been scheduled to be transmitted using the same precoding matrix). Regarding Claim 8, Ly discloses transmission based on a demodulation reference signal (DM-RS) bundle is enabled for the first cell and transmit, to the wireless device, a downlink control information (DCI) scheduling, for the first cell, transmission of one or more repetitions of an uplink signal within the DM-RS bundle(page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled, such that uplink DMRS bundling performed by UE, when the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the currently-received DCI indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled when the bit has a same value as the uplink DMRS bundling bit within a most recently received DCI(DCI scheduling)); receive, from the wireless device, the one or more repetitions within the DM-RS bundle(page 16, par (0135), line 10-20, the base station transmit an indication of the DMRS bundling configuration based on MCS, a timing gap between the physical shared channel symbols, a quantity of repetitions of physical shared channels); and skip transmitting, to the wireless device and during a time duration corresponding to the DM-RS bundle, downlink signals via the first cell of the cell group and the second cell of the cell group(page 19, par (0163), line 1-20, mobile device ignores(skip monitoring) a received indication to adjust transmit power when the indication received during a duration in which uplink DMRS bundling has been scheduled, during a duration in which DMRSs have been scheduled to be transmitted using the same precoding matrix). Ly discloses all aspects of the claimed invention, except a base station comprising one or more processors; and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the base station to transmit, to a wireless device, one or more radio resource control (RRC) messages indicating that a cell group comprises a first cell and a second cell. Park is the same field of invention teaches a base station comprising one or more processors; and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the base station to transmit, to a wireless device, one or more radio resource control (RRC) messages indicating that a cell group comprises a first cell and a second cell (page 3, par (0046), line 1-10, user equipment (UE) control plane (RRC) protocol, the gNBs and the ng-eNB are connected to each other through Xn interfaces (wherein gNBs is a first cell and the ng-eNB is a a second cell)). Ly and Park analogous art because they are from the same field of endeavor of access to a service device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the wireless device to receive one or more radio resource control (RRC) messages indicating that a cell group comprises a first cell and a second cell teaching of Ly to include the user equipment (UE) control plane (RRC) protocol, the gNBs and the ng-eNB are connected to each other through Xn interfaces teaching of Park because it is providing improving the uplink coverage of the UE in the NR system, in particular, the transmission coverage of PUSCH and PUCCH, which are uplink radio data channels and radio control channels. Regarding Claim 9, Ly discloses the instructions further cause the base station to receive the one or more repetitions of the uplink signal within the DM-RS bundle(page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the currently-received DCI indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled when the bit has a same value as the uplink DMRS bundling bit within a most recently received DCI(DCI scheduling)). Regarding Claim 10, Ly discloses the instructions further cause the base station to receive at least two DM-RSs via the one or more repetitions (page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled, such that uplink DMRS bundling performed by UE, when the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI). Regarding Claim 11, Ly discloses the one or more RRC messages further indicate a number of repetitions in the DM-RS bundle(page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the currently-received DCI indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled when the bit has a same value as the uplink DMRS bundling bit within a most recently received DCI(DCI scheduling)). Regarding Claim 12, Ly discloses the DCI further indicates a number of repetitions of the uplink signal across one or more DM-RS bundles(page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the currently-received DCI indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled when the bit has a same value as the uplink DMRS bundling bit within a most recently received DCI(DCI scheduling)). Regarding Claim 13, Ly discloses the time duration comprises one or more slots(page 19, par (0163), line 1-20, mobile device ignores (skip monitoring) a received indication to adjust transmit power when the indication received during a duration in which uplink DMRS bundling has been scheduled, during a duration in which DMRSs have been scheduled to be transmitted using the same precoding matrix). Regarding Claim 15, Ly discloses transmission based on a demodulation reference signal (DM-RS) bundle is enabled for the first cell and receive a downlink control information (DCI) scheduling, for the first cell, transmission of one or more repetitions of an uplink signal within the DM-RS bundle(page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled, such that uplink DMRS bundling performed by UE, when the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the currently-received DCI indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled when the bit has a same value as the uplink DMRS bundling bit within a most recently received DCI(DCI scheduling)); transmit the one or more repetitions within the DM-RS bundle (page 16, par (0135), line 10-20, the base station transmit an indication of the DMRS bundling configuration based on MCS, a timing gap between the physical shared channel symbols, a quantity of repetitions of physical shared channels); and skip monitoring, during a time duration corresponding to the DM-RS bundle, downlink signals via the first cell of the cell group and the second cell of the cell group(page 19, par (0163), line 1-20, mobile device ignores(skip monitoring) a received indication to adjust transmit power when the indication received during a duration in which uplink DMRS bundling has been scheduled, during a duration in which DMRSs have been scheduled to be transmitted using the same precoding matrix). Ly discloses all aspects of the claimed invention, except instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of a wireless device, cause the wireless device to receive one or more radio resource control (RRC) messages indicating that a cell group comprises a first cell and a second cell. Park is the same field of invention teaches instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of a wireless device, cause the wireless device to receive one or more radio resource control (RRC) messages indicating that a cell group comprises a first cell and a second cell (page 3, par (0046), line 1-10, user equipment (UE) control plane (RRC) protocol, the gNBs and the ng-eNB are connected to each other through Xn interfaces (wherein gNBs is a first cell and the ng-eNB is a a second cell)). Ly and Park analogous art because they are from the same field of endeavor of access to a service device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the wireless device to receive one or more radio resource control (RRC) messages indicating that a cell group comprises a first cell and a second cell teaching of Ly to include the user equipment (UE) control plane (RRC) protocol, the gNBs and the ng-eNB are connected to each other through Xn interfaces teaching of Park because it is providing improving the uplink coverage of the UE in the NR system, in particular, the transmission coverage of PUSCH and PUCCH, which are uplink radio data channels and radio control channels. Regarding Claim 16, Bedekar discloses the instructions further cause the wireless device to transmit at least tvo DM-RSs via the one or more repetitions (page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled, such that uplink DMRS bundling performed by UE, when the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI). Regarding Claim 17, Bedekar discloses the instructions further cause the wireless device to use a same DM-RS sequence for the one or more repetitions in the DM-RS bundle(page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the currently-received DCI indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled when the bit has a same value as the uplink DMRS bundling bit within a most recently received DCI(DCI scheduling)). Regarding Claim 18, Bedekar discloses the one or more RRC messages further indicate a number of repetitions in the DM-RS bundle(page 12, par (0103), line 1-10, the uplink DMRS bundling bit indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled, such that uplink DMRS bundling performed by UE, when the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the DCI is not toggled across multiple consecutive transmissions of DCI, the uplink DMRS bundling bit within the currently-received DCI indicate that uplink DMRS bundling is enabled). Regarding Claim 19, Bedekar discloses the time duration comprises one or more slots (page 19, par (0163), line 1-20, mobile device ignores (skip monitoring) a received indication to adjust transmit power when the indication received during a duration in which uplink DMRS bundling has been scheduled, during a duration in which DMRSs have been scheduled to be transmitted using the same precoding matrix). Examiner Notice Claim 1 would be allowable if (i) claim 7 is incorporated into the independent claim 1. Claim 8 would be allowable if (i) claim 14 is incorporated into the independent claim 8. Claim 15 would be allowable if (i) claim 20 is incorporated into the independent claim 15. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to IQBAL ZAIDI whose telephone number is (571)270-3943. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon to Thu 8.a.m to 6.p.m.. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Q Ngo can be reached on 57-272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /IQBAL ZAIDI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 28, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604365
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598564
MULTIPLEXING AND PRIORITIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR UPLINK SIGNALING AND NON-SERVING CELL SYNCHRONIZATION SIGNALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598597
TECHNIQUES FOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION IMPROVEMENT IN A MOBILE NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587912
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DATA TRANSMISSION IN WIRELESS NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581489
RESOURCE REQUEST METHOD, ALLOCATION METHOD, AND ACQUISITION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+6.6%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1207 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month