Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/216,017

BEACH TOWEL

Non-Final OA §112§DP
Filed
Jun 29, 2023
Examiner
GRAVINI, STEPHEN MICHAEL
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
The Tranzonic Companies
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
1260 granted / 1605 resolved
+8.5% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1642
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1605 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informalities: claim 20 depends upon itself. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 15-20 are construed to be indefinite because the claim 15 recitation of “the other” lacks a positive antecedent basis. Since claims 16-17 depend upon an indefinite claim, those claims are construed to be indefinite by dependency. Claim 18 is construed to be indefinite because the recitation “the folding chair” lacks a positive antecedent basis. Since claims 19-20 depend upon an indefinite claim, those claims are construed to be indefinite by dependency. Furthermore claim 20 is construed to be indefinite because that claim depends upon itself. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 are allowable over the prior art of record because a towel for drying a user or a method of covering a beach chair with a towel with all the independently claimed features including plural fasteners, ties, or connectors coupled together forming a pocket to receive a foot or back portion of a chair is not found in the prior art either singly or in combination. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Other references cited in this action, may teach one or more claim features, but do not rise to a level of anticipation, obviousness, and/or double patenting such that a rejection would be proper or reasonable under current Office practice and procedure. Reference A, cited with this action, is a patent publication from the same inventive entity as the current application. References B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, cited with this action teach towel type devices. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN MICHAEL GRAVINI whose telephone number is (571)272-4875. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 5:30 am to 5:00 (mid day flex) first F 6:00 am t0 11:00 am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Craig Schneider can be reached at 571 272 3607. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Thursday, January 15, 2026 /STEPHEN M GRAVINI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601542
LYOPHILIZED REAGENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601105
DRYER ECO CYCLE CONTROL ALGORITHM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601104
Sports Equipment Drying Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590405
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING A REDUCED STATIC FEATURE IN A LAUNDRY TREATMENT APPLIANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584688
GRAIN DRYER WITH DIRECTIONAL CONTAINMENT BAFFLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+18.2%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1605 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month