Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/216,017

BEACH TOWEL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 29, 2023
Examiner
GRAVINI, STEPHEN MICHAEL
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
The Tranzonic Companies
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1263 granted / 1611 resolved
+8.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1643
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
62.3%
+22.3% vs TC avg
§102
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§112
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1611 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informalities: claim 20 depends upon itself. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 15-20 are construed to be indefinite because the claim 15 recitation of “the other” lacks a positive antecedent basis. Since claims 16-17 depend upon an indefinite claim, those claims are construed to be indefinite by dependency. Claim 18 is construed to be indefinite because the recitation “the folding chair” lacks a positive antecedent basis. Since claims 19-20 depend upon an indefinite claim, those claims are construed to be indefinite by dependency. Furthermore claim 20 is construed to be indefinite because that claim depends upon itself. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 are allowable over the prior art of record because a towel for drying a user or a method of covering a beach chair with a towel with all the independently claimed features including plural fasteners, ties, or connectors coupled together forming a pocket to receive a foot or back portion of a chair is not found in the prior art either singly or in combination. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Other references cited in this action, may teach one or more claim features, but do not rise to a level of anticipation, obviousness, and/or double patenting such that a rejection would be proper or reasonable under current Office practice and procedure. Reference A, cited with this action, is a patent publication from the same inventive entity as the current application. References B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, cited with this action teach towel type devices. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN MICHAEL GRAVINI whose telephone number is (571)272-4875. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 5:30 am to 5:00 (mid day flex) first F 6:00 am t0 11:00 am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Craig Schneider can be reached at 571 272 3607. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Thursday, January 15, 2026 /STEPHEN M GRAVINI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12631395
Electrode Drying Device
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631396
DRYING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE TREATING APPARATUS
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630969
DRY APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR
2y 12m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624895
DRYING FURNACE AND COATING DRYING METHOD
3y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628602
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS
3y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+18.5%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1611 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month