Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/216,310

PROCESSOR WITH VIRTUALIZABLE SIGNAL MONITORS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 29, 2023
Examiner
WAI, ERIC CHARLES
Art Unit
2195
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
529 granted / 644 resolved
+27.1% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
671
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
§103
50.0%
+10.0% vs TC avg
§102
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
§112
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 644 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are presented for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rusitoru et al. (US PG Pub No. 2022/0308879 A1). Rusitoru was disclosed in IDS dated 08/19/2024. Regarding claim 1, Rusitoru teaches a method comprising: receiving, at a system, a first virtual signal monitor request from a first virtual signal monitor associated with a first virtual signal ([0014], wherein accelerator’s physical address space is mapped into host processes virtual space; [0021], wherein an “instruction executed on the host processor and referencing a first virtual address of the process … Execution of the instruction includes translating, by translation hardware of the host processor, the first virtual address to a first physical address. However, for an instruction executed on the accelerator device and referencing the first virtual address, the first virtual address is translated to a second physical address by the translation hardware of the host processor before the instruction is sent to the accelerator device.”); Rusitoru does not teach executing a first signal operation at hardware signal monitor circuitry (HSM) of the system. However, Rusitoru teaches “the host mapping function sets the virtual memory overlay for the accelerator by mapping the virtual address for the input and output buffers to the physical addresses of the input and output buffers of the accelerator. This may be done, for example, by resetting a remap register value for the translation hardware" ([0042]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to derive executing a first signal operation at hardware signal monitor circuitry (HSM) of the system. One would be motivated by the desire to perform operations that utilize the mappings as taught by Rusitoru. Regarding claim 2, Rusitoru teaches the first signal operation comprises one of a load operation, a store operation, an atomic memory operation, and a signal wait operation ([0052]). Regarding claim 3, Rusitoru teaches further comprising: mapping, at the HSM, a first physical signal of the system to the first virtual signal ([0028]; [0031]). Regarding claim 4, Rusitoru teaches further comprising: in response to receiving a second virtual signal monitor request associated with a second virtual signal, forwarding, at the HSM, the second virtual signal monitor request to a memory for execution ([0042]). Regarding claim 5, Rusitoru teaches wherein forwarding comprises forwarding the second virtual signal monitor request in response to determining at the HSM that the second virtual signal is a non-monitored signal ([0042]). Regarding claim 6, Rusitoru teaches further comprising: in response to receiving a second virtual signal monitor request associated with a second virtual signal, forgoing execution of the second virtual signal monitor request based on an identified implication of the execution ([0042]). Regarding claim 7, Rusitoru teaches wherein the HSM includes a plurality of physical signal monitors and further comprising: assigning, at the HSM, a first physical signal monitor of the plurality of physical signal monitors, to the first virtual signal monitor (Fig 3; [0028], "A region 304 of virtual address space 214 is assigned for the code, as depicted by mapping 306. Optionally, data 206 is loaded in physical memory, as depicted by mapping 308 and mapped to virtual address region 310, as indicated by mapping 312."). Regarding claim 8, Rusitoru teaches reassigning, at the HSM, the first physical signal monitor to a second virtual signal monitor (Fig 3; [0028], "A region 304 of virtual address space 214 is assigned for the code, as depicted by mapping 306. Optionally, data 206 is loaded in physical memory, as depicted by mapping 308 and mapped to virtual address region 310, as indicated by mapping 312."). Regarding claims 9-16, they are the system claims of claims 1-8 above. Therefore, they are rejected for the same reasons as claims 1-8 above. Regarding claim 17, Rusitoru teaches a method comprising: instantiating, at a system, a plurality of virtual signals ([0042], wherein “the host mapping function sets the virtual memory overlay for the accelerator by mapping the virtual address for the input and output buffers to the physical addresses of the input and output buffers of the accelerator. This may be done, for example, by resetting a remap register value for the translation hardware"). Rusitoru does not teach at a first time assigning, at hardware signal monitor circuitry (HSM) of the system, a plurality of physical signals to a first subset of the plurality of virtual signals. However, Rusitoru teaches "A region 304 of virtual address space 214 is assigned for the code, as depicted by mapping 306. Optionally, data 206 is loaded in physical memory, as depicted by mapping 308 and mapped to virtual address region 310, as indicated by mapping 312” ([0028]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to derive assigning, at hardware signal monitor circuitry (HSM) of the system, a plurality of physical signals to a first subset of the plurality of virtual signals. One would be motivated by the desire to perform operations that utilize the mappings as taught by Rusitoru. Regarding claim 18, Rusitoru teaches at a second time, assigning the plurality of physical signals to a second subset of the plurality of virtual signals, the second subset different from the first subset ([0028], wherein "A region 304 of virtual address space 214 is assigned for the code, as depicted by mapping 306. Optionally, data 206 is loaded in physical memory, as depicted by mapping 308 and mapped to virtual address region 310, as indicated by mapping 312”; [0042], wherein “the host mapping function sets the virtual memory overlay for the accelerator by mapping the virtual address for the input and output buffers to the physical addresses of the input and output buffers of the accelerator. This may be done, for example, by resetting a remap register value for the translation hardware). Regarding claim 19, Rusitoru teaches monitoring the plurality of physical signals at the HSM ([0028], wherein "A region 304 of virtual address space 214 is assigned for the code, as depicted by mapping 306. Optionally, data 206 is loaded in physical memory, as depicted by mapping 308 and mapped to virtual address region 310, as indicated by mapping 312”; [0042], wherein “the host mapping function sets the virtual memory overlay for the accelerator by mapping the virtual address for the input and output buffers to the physical addresses of the input and output buffers of the accelerator. This may be done, for example, by resetting a remap register value for the translation hardware). Regarding claim 20, Rusitoru does not teach executing, at the HSM, signal operations for the plurality of physical signals in response to signal operation requests associated with the plurality of virtual signals. However, Rusitoru teaches “the host mapping function sets the virtual memory overlay for the accelerator by mapping the virtual address for the input and output buffers to the physical addresses of the input and output buffers of the accelerator. This may be done, for example, by resetting a remap register value for the translation hardware" ([0042]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to derive executing, at the HSM, signal operations for the plurality of physical signals in response to signal operation requests associated with the plurality of virtual signals. One would be motivated by the desire to perform operations that utilize the mappings as taught by Rusitoru. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIC C WAI whose telephone number is (571)270-1012. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Aimee Li can be reached at (571) 272-4169. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Eric C Wai/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2195
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2023
Application Filed
May 02, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602261
CONTAINER SCHEDULING ACCORDING TO PREEMPTING A SET OF PREEMPTABLE CONTAINERS DEPLOYED IN A CLUSTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602248
METHOD AND DEVICE OF LAUNCHING AN APPLICATION IN BACKGROUND
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585498
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN DYNAMIC SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585503
UNIFIED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ARCHITECTURE FOR WORKLOAD SCHEDULERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579001
REINFORCEMENT LEARNING SPACE STATE PRUNING USING RESTRICTED BOLTZMANN MACHINES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.2%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 644 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month