Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/216,641

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUGMENTING A LIVE BROADCAST OF A SPORTING EVENT AT DIFFERENT LEVELS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 30, 2023
Examiner
SHANG, ANNAN Q
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
591 granted / 835 resolved
+10.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
871
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
46.5%
+6.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 835 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 2. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 3. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by SANCHEZ et al (2020/0186893). As to claims 1-20, SANCHEZ discloses systems and methods for gamification for real-time instructional commenting and further discloses a computer implemented method for augmenting a live broadcast of a sporting event comprising: receiving or generating a data stream of a live broadcast of a sporting event; generating commentary on the live broadcast in real time at a plurality of different levels of knowledge of the sport of the sporting event being broadcast (figs.1-15, Abstract, [0016-0021]), the media guidance app (MGA) identifies videos generate by viewers watching a live sprots event and generates relevant commentary for the live video broadcast; further generates social media textual comments or posts and other online commentary; determining a knowledge level of the sport of a user; and providing the generated commentary at one of the plurality levels of knowledge of the sport to a user in real time based on the determined knowledge level of the sport of the user; wherein the commentary on the live broadcast is provided on a social media service to enable collaborative explanation of sporting events at different levels by subscribers of the social media service; including generating real-time translation of the generated commentary at a plurality of different levels of knowledge in a plurality of languages and providing the translated commentary on the live broadcast at one of the plurality levels of knowledge of the sport to a user in real time based on the determined knowledge level of the user (figs.1-15, [0016-0020], [0027-0033], [0049-0054], [0062-0067], [0074-0054] and [0140-0145]), generates explanatory commentary using different audio signature various social media comments; explanatory graphics, a language of the explanatory based on the determined level of knowledge of the user or based on preferences of the users; the MGA may receive additional input from the user indicating lack of understanding of various segments of the videos being watch and further receive additional clarification As to claims 4-5, SANCHEZ further discloses that wherein the generating real-time translation of the generated commentary is based on a custom pretrained generative AI service; including automatically transitioning the generated commentary provided to the user from one level of knowledge of the sport to another level of knowledge of the sport, and wherein the automatically transitioning is based on an in-built knowledge testing of the user about the sporting event, wherein the in-built testing comprises at least one of a number of explanations attended past a specified threshold, and a number of comments from viewers that are matched with known explanations stored in a database ([0013-0016], [0059-0060] and [0117-0118]), the MGA learnings from activity of users or viewers to determine the likelihood of a viewer requesting for further explanatory commentary based on the level(s) of knowledge. As to claims 4-5, SANCHEZ further discloses wherein determining a knowledge level of the sport being broadcast of a user comprises predicting the user's level of knowledge based on other sporting events they have watched; further including providing the generated commentary on the live broadcast at the plurality levels of knowledge of the sport to a plurality of users in real time based on a determined knowledge level of the users in a shared real or virtual environment ([0013-0016], [0059-0060] and [0117-0118]), social media comments. As to claims 8-11, the claimed “A computer system for augmenting live broadcast…” is composed of the same structural elements that were discussed with respect to claims 1-3 Claims 12-13 are met as previously discussed in claims 4-5. Claim 14 is met as previously discussed in claim 6 As to claims 15-17, the claimed “A computer program product…” is composed of the same structural elements that were discussed with respect to claims 1-3 Claims 18-19 are met as previously discussed in claims 4-5. Claim 20 is met as previously discussed in claim 6 Conclusion 4. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANNAN Q SHANG whose telephone number is (571)272-7355. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BENJAMIN BRUCKART can be reached at 571-272-3982. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANNAN Q SHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2424 ANNAN Q. SHANG
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 30, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 21, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12713106
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PAUSING A DIGITAL MEDIA STREAM IN RESPONSE TO DETERMINING THAT AN ASSOCIATED DISPLAY DEVICE IS TURNED OFF
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12713082
IMAGE SECURITY USING SEGMENTATION
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12707109
DISPLAY APPARATUS, SERVER APPARATUS, DISPLAY SYSTEM INCLUDING THEM, AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING CONTENT THEREOF
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701277
EFFICIENT STREAMING FORMAT
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689778
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERALIZED HTTP HEADERS IN DYNAMIC ADAPTIVE STREAMING OVER HTTP (DASH)
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+10.7%)
3y 4m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 835 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month