Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/217,952

CARRIER AGGREGATION AND DUAL CONNECTIVITY SWITCHING IN A CELLULAR NETWORK

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Jul 03, 2023
Examiner
EBRAHIM, ANEZ C
Art Unit
2467
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Dish Wireless L.L.C.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
622 granted / 755 resolved
+24.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
796
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 755 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION 1. This communication is response to the application filed 11/13/2025 havingclaims 1-20 pending and presented for examination. Priority 2. Application filed on 07/03/2023 is a has PRO 63/458,609 04/11/2023are acknowledged. Drawings 3. The drawings were received on 07/03/2023 and these drawings are accepted. 4. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS)s submitted on 11/13/2025, 09/11/2025, 08/27/2025,08/01/205,09/20/2024,07/19/2024,11/02/2023 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Oath/Declaration 4. The Oath/Declaration filed on 07/03/2023 is accepted by the examiner. Double Patenting 4.1. A rejection based on double patenting of the "same invention" type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that "whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process ... may obtain a patent therefor ..." (Emphasis added). Thus, the term "same invention," in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957); and In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970). Claim 1, 17 are provisionally rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1, 5 of copending Application No. 18/217,936. This is a provisional double patenting rejection since the conflicting claims have not in fact been patented. As per claim 1. A method comprising electronically determining whether an inter-distributed unit (inter-DU) communication link between a plurality of distributed units (DUs) in a Radio Access Network (RAN) of a wireless cellular telecommunication network that provides wireless cellular telecommunication network services to a plurality of UEs is available; electronically determining whether to use carrier aggregation across cells that are each managed by different respective DUs of the plurality of DUs and or to use dual connectivity for the cells based on the determination whether an inter-DU communication link is available; electronically determining whether measurements of inter-DU communication characteristics of communication between the plurality of DUs are available; electronically determining whether to use the carrier aggregation or the dual connectivity based on the determination whether the measurements of inter-DU communication characteristics are available; in instances where the measurements of inter-DU communication characteristics are determined to be available, determining, based on the measurements, whether one or more of inter-DU link latency and inter-DU link bandwidth availability meets criteria for using the carrier aggregation; and electronically determining whether to use the carrier aggregation or the dual connectivity based on the determination whether the one or more of inter-DU link latency and inter-DU link bandwidth availability meets the criteria (Claim 1. (Currently Amended) A method comprising: electronically measuring, via one or more Radio Access Network (RAN) functions, one or more of: user equipment (UE) communication characteristics of one or more UE devices (UEs) and inter-distributed unit (inter-DU) communication characteristics of communication between a plurality of distributed units (DUs) of a wireless cellular telecommunication network that provides wireless cellular telecommunication network services to the one or more UEs; [[and]] electronically reporting the one or more of: UE communication characteristics and measured inter-DU communication characteristics; and causing switching to be performed, based on measured inter-DU communication characteristics, between using carrier aggregation across cells that are each managed by different respective DUs of the plurality of DUs and using dual connectivity for the cells that are each managed by different respective DUs of the plurality of DUs, wherein the dual connectivity uses an F1 interface to split Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) packets across the different respective, claim 5, wherein the inter-DU communication characteristics include one or more of: inter-DU link quality, inter-DU link latency, inter-DU link bandwidth availability and current usage of an inter-DU link). As per claim 17, A method comprising electronically determining whether an inter-distributed unit (inter-DU) communication link between a plurality of distributed units (DUs) in a Radio Access Network (RAN) of a wireless cellular telecommunication network that provides wireless cellular telecommunication network services to a plurality of UEs is available; electronically determining whether to use carrier aggregation across cells that are each managed by different respective DUs of the plurality of DUs and or to use dual connectivity for the cells based on the determination whether an inter-DU communication link is available; electronically determining whether measurements of inter-DU communication characteristics of communication between the plurality of DUs are available; electronically determining whether to use the carrier aggregation or the dual connectivity based on the determination whether the measurements of inter-DU communication characteristics are available; in instances where the measurements of inter-DU communication characteristics are determined to be available, determining, based on the measurements, whether consumption of network resources provided by the cells meets criteria for using the carrier aggregation; and electronically determining whether to use the carrier aggregation or the dual connectivity based on the determination whether the consumption of network resources provided by the cells meets the criteria for using the carrier aggregation ((Claim 1. (Currently Amended) A method comprising: electronically measuring, via one or more Radio Access Network (RAN) functions, one or more of: user equipment (UE) communication characteristics of one or more UE devices (UEs) and inter-distributed unit (inter-DU) communication characteristics of communication between a plurality of distributed units (DUs) of a wireless cellular telecommunication network that provides wireless cellular telecommunication network services to the one or more UEs; [[and]] electronically reporting the one or more of: UE communication characteristics and measured inter-DU communication characteristics; and causing switching to be performed, based on measured inter-DU communication characteristics, between using carrier aggregation across cells that are each managed by different respective DUs of the plurality of DUs and using dual connectivity for the cells that are each managed by different respective DUs of the plurality of DUs, wherein the dual connectivity uses an F1 interface to split Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) packets across the different respective). Conclusion Prior arts made of record, not relied upon: US Patent Publication US 20080226094 A1; US Patent Publication US 20150304116 A1, US Patent Publication US 6724746 B1 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANEZ EBRAHIM whose telephone number is (571)270-7153. The examiner can normally be reached on MF 8 AM to 5 PM ff attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hassan Phillips can be reached on (571) 272-3940. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see =. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217- 9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANEZ C EBRAHIM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2467
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP
Mar 25, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 25, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593295
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING PDU SESSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593338
RESOURCE CONFIGURATION FOR EPDCCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574919
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563447
AI-BASED CELLULAR NETWORK MANAGEMENT AND ORCHESTRATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557040
METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+4.2%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 755 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month