Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/218,363

AIRBAG POUCH INCORPORATED IN A BACKPACK OR A GARMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 05, 2023
Examiner
HELVEY, PETER N.
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
In&Motion
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
754 granted / 1386 resolved
-15.6% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
1447
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.3%
+14.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1386 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species 2 in the reply filed on 12/18/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there is no serious burden to examine all species in the application and the identified species are not patentably distinct (Item 1 of Traversal). This is found persuasive and the requirement is withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4 and 6-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aoyama (JP 2011246851) in view of Kincheloe (US 4685151). Aoyama discloses an airbag pouch for personal protection of a user of an urban mobility vehicle such as for example a cycle, a scooter, a skateboard or roller skates, comprising a closed body made from flexible and tear-resistant material forming an envelope, characterized in that the envelope forms, in an inflated state: - two stiffening structures (57R, 57L), located laterally on either side of the head of the user (see Figs. 15, 16), each with a central portion in abutment on the shoulder of the user extended by two legs disposed one in front of, the other behind the shoulder of the user (see Figs. 15, 16), and each a top loop, located on a side of the head of the user (see Figs. 15, 16); except does not expressly disclose the arch completing the surrounding of the head of the user as claimed. However, Kincheloe teaches a similar device including an arch (40) forming a protection surrounding the head of the user (see Figs. 5, 6). At the time of the invention, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to add the head protecting arch taught by Kincheloe to the airbag assembly taught by Aoyama, in order to protect the head of the user as taught by Kincheloe. When viewed in combination, Aoyama as modified above results in a device wherein the arch connects the tops of the top loops of the stiffening structures and forming, once inflated and with the top loops of the stiffening structures, forms a protection surrounding the head of the user. Aoyama as modified above results in a device wherein the top loops of the stiffening structures are produced in annular form, with a less thick central portion (Aoyama Figs. 15, 16; slots 67 meet scope of central portion); the legs of the stiffening structures located, in a deployed state, on the front of the chest of the user are curved with a curvature concave towards the front to bear on the user (Aoyama Fig. 15; @77d); the legs of the stiffening structures located, in the deployed state, on the front of the chest of the user include transverse pads (Aoyama 60R, 60L) which, once inflated, form protective pectoral plates; and the arch includes one or more baffles (Kincheloe pleats 42), stiffening the arch in the deployed state, forming preferential folding lines and limiting the circulation of the gas towards a dorsal part of the pouch throughout an impact on the part above or behind the head of the user (functional recitation). Aoyama as modified above results in a device including two gas-inlet conduits each emerging in one of the legs of the stiffening structures located, in the deployed state, on the back of the user, at the upper third of said leg of the stiffening structures (Aoyama 87 either side, see Figs. 9, 10); an actuator, configured to detect accident situations, - at least one cartridge, which is triggered when the actuator detects an accident situation, characterized in that it includes an airbag pouch according to claim 1 inflated by the at least one cartridge when it is triggered (Aoyama translation para 0051). Claim(s) 9-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aoyama (JP 2011246851) in view of Kincheloe (US 4685151) as applied to claim 8 above, and further in view of Thevenot et al. (EP 3901016, hereinafter ‘Thevenot’). Aoyama as modified above discloses all limitations of the claim(s) as detailed above and further including the front legs of the stiffening structures are located, in the folded state, in housings (25R, 25L) being closed by disengageable mechanical links (34), which open under the action of the inflation of the pouch; except does not expressly disclose the backpack assembly as claimed. However, Thevenot teaches a similar device wherein the airbag assembly is incorporated into a backpack rather than a vest (Figs. 1, 2) as claimed. Because Aoyama as modified above and Thevenot both teach airbag assemblies incorporated into wearable devices, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to substitute the backpack carrying structure taught by Thevenot for the vest carrying structure taught by Aoyama as modified above for the airbag as claimed. Aoyama as modified above results in a device wherein the disengageable mechanical links comprise press studs (34); and a pack body close to the back of the user incorporating the airbag according to claim 8, and a removable separate part forming a storage space (when viewed in combination with Thevenot backpack). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER N. HELVEY whose telephone number is (571)270-1423. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10am-7pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER N HELVEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734 February 28, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 05, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602012
WATCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593903
CONTAINMENT MAT THAT CONVERTS TO LUGGAGE WITH SECURE SEAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588747
Holder for Container
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583395
RAIL TOP CARGO MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12559290
REUSEABLE GIFT WRAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+18.6%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1386 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month