Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/219,642

APPARATUS AND METHOD OF DATA ANOMALY DETECTION BASED ON IMPORTANT FEATURE VALUE AND LOW COMPLEXITY MODEL

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 07, 2023
Examiner
JACOB, AJITH
Art Unit
2161
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Foundation Of Soongsil University-Industry Cooperation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
390 granted / 495 resolved
+23.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
513
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
§103
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§102
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 495 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The instant application having Application No. 18/219,642 has a total of 12 claims pending in the application, there are 3 independent claims and 9 dependent claims, all of which are ready for examination by the examiner. Oath/Declaration The applicant’s oath/declaration has been reviewed by the examiner and is found to conform to the requirements prescribed in 37 C.F.R. 1.63. Drawings The applicant’s drawings submitted are acceptable for examination purposes. Specification The applicant’s specification submitted are acceptable for examination purposes. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8 and 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being unpatentable over Liu et al. (US 2023/0089481 A1). For claim 1, Liu et al. teaches: An anomaly detection method performed by an electronic device including one or more processors, a communication circuit which communicates with an external device, and one or more memories storing at least one instruction executed by the one or more processors [anomaly detection system, 0077: Liu], the method comprising: by the one or more processors, receiving target data for discriminating whether an anomaly occurs, wherein the target data includes a value for each of a plurality of features [receiving targeted and structured data for anomaly detection, 0018-0019: Liu]; inputting a value for at least one important feature among the plurality of features into an anomaly detection model, wherein the at least one important feature is determined by important feature information received from the external device [reception of node to node features for anomaly detection, 0018; reception of service to device, 0077: Liu]; and determining whether the target data is abnormal based on an output of the anomaly detection model [detection of abnormality, 0017: Liu]. For claim 2, Liu et al. teaches: The anomaly detection method according to claim 1, wherein the external device determines at least one important feature among the plurality of features included in the target data based on an autoencoder model [feature determination from data based on autoencoder model, 0051-0059: Liu]. For claim 3, Liu et al. teaches: The anomaly detection method according to claim 2, wherein the anomaly detection model is a low complexity model having a lower complexity than the autoencoder model [anomaly detection model with better performance than autoencoder model, 0020-0023: Liu]. For claim 4, Liu et al. teaches: The anomaly detection method according to claim 1, wherein the anomaly detection model is a model learned based on at least one technique of isolation forest, principal component analysis (PCA), support vector machine (SVM), a density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), or normal distribution technique [anomaly modeling based on spatial modeling and normal distribution, 0019 and 0024: Liu]. For claim 5, Liu et al. teaches: The anomaly detection method according to claim 1, wherein the determining of whether the target data is abnormal includes comparing an evaluation score calculated by the output of the anomaly detection model and a critical score, and determining the target data as anomaly data when the evaluation score is equal to or less than the critical score [anomaly scoring based on comparison to a reference score, 0017: Liu]. For claim 6, Liu et al. teaches: An anomaly detection method performed by an electronic device including one or more processors, a communication circuit which communicates with an external device, and one or more memories storing at least one instruction executed by the one or more processors [anomaly detection system, 0077: Liu], the method comprising: by the one or more processors, acquiring an original data set constituted by data of the same format as target data to be subjected to anomaly detection [comparison and anomaly detection based on scoring using initial data with test data, 0051-0064: Liu]; determining at least one important feature among a plurality of features of data based on an autoencoder model and the original data set [features determined based on autoencoder model, 0051-0059: Liu]; and transmitting important feature information including information on the at least one important feature to the external device through the communication circuit [reception of node to node features for anomaly detection, 0018; reception of service to device, 0077: Liu]. For claim 8, Liu et al. teaches: The anomaly detection method according to claim 6, wherein the determining of the at least one important feature includes calculating each of a first reconstruction error change amount for a specific feature in a normal data set included in the original data set [reconstruction errors based on network structure, 0059: Liu], and a second reconstruction error change amount for the specific feature in an anomaly data set included in the original data set [reconstruction errors based on node attributes, 0059: Liu]. For claim 11, Liu et al. teaches: An electronic device comprising: a communication circuit which communicates with an external device; one or more processors; and one or more memories storing instructions which cause the one or more processors to perform a computation when being executed by the one or more processors [anomaly detection system, 0077: Liu], wherein the one or more processors are configured to receive target data for discriminating whether an anomaly occurs, wherein the target data includes a value for each of a plurality of features [receiving targeted and structured data for anomaly detection, 0018-0019: Liu], input a value for at least one important feature among the plurality of features into an anomaly detection model, wherein the at least one important feature is determined by important feature information received from the external device [reception of node to node features for anomaly detection, 0018; reception of service to device, 0077: Liu], and determine whether the target data is abnormal based on an output of the anomaly detection model [detection of abnormality, 0017: Liu]. For claim 12, Liu et al. teaches: The electronic device according to The electronic device according to wherein the one or more processors are configured to acquire an original data set constituted by data of the same format as target data to be subjected to anomaly detection [comparison and anomaly detection based on scoring using initial data with test data, 0051-0064: Liu], determine at least one important feature among a plurality of features of data based on an autoencoder model and the original data set [features determined based on autoencoder model, 0051-0059: Liu], and transmit important feature information including information on the at least one important feature to the external device through the communication circuit [reception of node to node features for anomaly detection, 0018; reception of service to device, 0077: Liu]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7 and 9-10 are in condition for allowance. For dependent claims 7, 9 and 10, prior art, in current interpretation of the perceived language, calculating reconstruction error change for features like cited reference Liu et al. (US 2023/0089481 A1) but does not calculating a reconstruction error of the original data set by using the autoencoder model, calculating a reconstruction error of a modified data set in which a specific feature value of data included in the original data set is changed by using the autoencoder model, and calculating an importance level of the specific feature value based on the reconstruction error of the original data set and the reconstruction error of the modified data set. Conclusion The Examiner requests, in response to this Office action, that support be shown for language added to any original claims on amendment and any new claims. That is, indicate support for newly added claim language by specifically pointing to page(s) and line no(s) in the specification and/or drawing figure(s). This will assist the Examiner in prosecuting the application. When responding to this Office action, Applicant is advised to clearly point out the patentable novelty which he or she thinks the claims present, in view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited or the objections made. He or she must also show how the amendments avoid such references or objections See 37 CFR 1.111(c). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AJITH M JACOB whose telephone number is (571)270-1763. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday: Flexible Hours. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Apu Mofiz can be reached on 571-272-4080. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AJITH JACOB/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2161 2/16/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 07, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602585
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING A REPRESENTATIVE INPUT DATA SET FOR POST-TRAINING QUANTIZATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585971
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND DECISION SUPPORT USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA FUSION TECHNIQUES ON DISTRIBUTED SENSOR NETWORK DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579162
EXTENSIBLE DATA TRANSFORMATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12579197
CUSTOM DATA FILTERING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12561347
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY EXTRACTING LATENT STRUCTURES AND RELATIONSHIPS IN DATASETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+4.2%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 495 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month