Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/220,383

LAMINATE DISPENSING DEVICE AND LAMINATE DISPENSING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 11, 2023
Examiner
RANDALL, JR., KELVIN L
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tanaka Engineering Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
63%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allow Rate
380 granted / 850 resolved
-7.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
900
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
56.3%
+16.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 850 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Claim 4 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 10/15/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takaaki Mitsui (JP 2005/334893 A – hereinafter Mitsui) in view of JP 2004/248423 A – hereinafter Ikushima) and Matsubayashi et al. (US 2019/0305654 A1 – hereinafter Matsubayashi). Re Claim 3: Mitsui discloses a laminate dispensing method comprising: preparing a plurality of thin steel sheets (T) weakly joined by one of an adhesive (caulking) before a curing process and a temporary crimping (can be securely crimped to each other) before a final crimping, a fixed squeeze (5) having a guide hole (near T) that accommodates the thin steel sheets (T) in a stacked state and that guides the thin steel sheets (T) gradually descending at a low speed, a backup (9) receiving the thin steel sheets (T) in a stacked state, a backup lifting mechanism (10) that raises and lowers the backup (9), a push-out mechanism (22) that dispenses a laminate (Q) on the backup (9) when a predetermined number of the thin steel sheets (T) being laminated is referred to as the laminate (Q), a movable squeeze (21) provided below the fixed squeeze (5), a squeeze opening and closing mechanism (mechanism which allows 21 to extend and retract as seen in Figs. 3 and 4) that opens and closes the movable squeeze (21), and a control unit that controls the backup lifting mechanism (10) and the push-out mechanism (22), wherein the control unit performs control to close the movable squeeze (21) while the thin steel sheets (T) protruding downward from the fixed squeeze (5) (see Fig. 4) are suspended on the thin steel sheets (T) inside the fixed squeeze (5) by a joining action (caulking/crimping), and to dispense the laminate (Q) while the movable squeeze (21) is closed (see Fig. 4), but where if fails to specifically teach adhesive. Ikushima teaches adhesive (“adhesive coating on their surfaces”). Therefore, it would have been obvious, before the effective filing date of the invention, to have been motivated to combine the teachings of Mitsui with that of Ikushima to allow for stacking of products as a unit. Matsubayashi teaches a controller (170) (see paragraph [0033]). Therefore, it would have been obvious, before the effective filing date of the invention, to have been motivated to combine the teachings of Mitsui with that of Ikushima and Matsubayashi to allow for control on an automatic device as known within the art. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 2 are allowed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KELVIN L RANDALL, JR. whose telephone number is (571)270-5373. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:00 am-5 pm est. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford can be reached at 571-272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K.L.R/Examiner, Art Unit 3651 /GENE O CRAWFORD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3651
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592115
HANDS-FREE VENDING MACHINE AND DOOR OPENING ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12545482
Structure for Sealing and Dispensing Cleaning Articles
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12525087
CUP DISPENSER SENSOR FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING REFILL ALERTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12507839
FRICTIONAL FEATURES FOR ROLLED SHEET PRODUCT DISPENSERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12492112
BEVERAGE DISPENSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
63%
With Interview (+17.9%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 850 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month