Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/221,059

SYSTEM FOR ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY TRAINING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 12, 2023
Priority
Jul 13, 2022 — provisional 63/388,904
Examiner
FRISBY, KESHA
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Tactile Orthopaedics Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
408 granted / 772 resolved
-17.2% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
801
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
§103
36.1%
-3.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 772 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3-8 & 10-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Poltaretskyi et al. (U.S. Publication Number 2019/0380792) in view of CN113855231A. Referring to claim 1, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses comprising: an apparatus for supporting at least one artificial model of the joint in at least one joint orientation position (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A), and at least one artificial model of the joint, releasably mounted to the apparatus, the apparatus configured for pivotal and rotatable movement of the artificial model within the at least one joint orientation position (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Poltarestskyi does not disclose a base, a manipulator arm mounted to the base; at least one artificial model of the joint releasably mounted to the apparatus manipulator arm, and the apparatus manipulator arm configured for pivotal and rotatable movement of the artificial model of the joint within the at least one joint orientation position and to provide loading conditions on the artificial model to mimic primary traction, secondary traction, flexion or extension, abduction or adduction, or internal or external rotation of the artificial model. However, CN113855231A teaches a base (1), a manipulator arm mounted to the base (Images 1, 2 & 4); at least one artificial model of the joint releasably mounted to the apparatus manipulator arm (images 2 and 4), and the apparatus manipulator arm configured for pivotal and rotatable movement of the artificial model of the joint within the at least one joint orientation position (abstract) and to provide loading conditions on the artificial model to mimic primary traction, secondary traction, flexion or extension, abduction or adduction, or internal or external rotation of the artificial model. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to include a base, a manipulator arm mounted to the base; at least one artificial model of the joint releasably mounted to the apparatus manipulator arm, and the apparatus manipulator arm configured for pivotal and rotatable movement of the artificial model of the joint within the at least one joint orientation position and to provide loading conditions on the artificial model to mimic primary traction, secondary traction, flexion or extension, abduction or adduction, or internal or external rotation of the artificial model, as disclosed by CN113855231A, incorporated into Poltarestskyi in order to have an orthopaedic hip arthroscopy surgery simulation device. Referring to claim 3, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the base further comprises: a base plate, a pedestal, and at least one T-bar connector for receiving and securing the manipulator arm (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 4, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the T-bar connector comprises at least two attachment posts for receiving and securing the manipulator arm in the at least one joint orientation position (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 5, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the manipulator arm further comprises at least one telescoping boom assembly (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 6, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the artificial model is a human joint (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 7, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the human joint is a shoulder joint (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 8, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the at least one joint orientation position comprises at least a beach chair position or a lateral decubitus position (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 10, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses comprising: a base, and a manipulator arm mounted to the base, the manipulator arm configured to rotatably and pivotally receive the at least one artificial model of the joint (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 11, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the base further comprises: a base plate, a pedestal, and at least one T-bar connector for receiving and securing the manipulator arm (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 12, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the T-bar connector comprises at least two attachment posts for receiving and securing the manipulator arm (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 13, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the manipulator arm may comprise: a sleeve for releasably mounting the manipulator arm to the base, and a boom assembly (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 14, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the boom assembly comprises a spring-biased piston assembly (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 15, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses comprising: at least one connector for releasably connecting the model to the apparatus in at least one surgical position (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 16, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the joint is a human joint (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 17, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the human joint is a shoulder joint (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 18, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the artificial model comprises one or more layers of artificial skin, fat, bones, muscles, tendons, ligaments, cartilage, or connecting soft tissue (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 19, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the model comprises at least a scapula bone and a humerus bone, and one of the at least one connectors connect the scapula bone to the apparatus and another one of the at least one connectors connect the humerus bone to the apparatus (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 20, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the model further comprises at least one of a rotator interval, a joint capsule, a musculotendinous junction, a tight or loose joint, cartilage, a labrum, a biceps tendon, or bones of different hardnesses (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 6/24/2026 have been fully considered. The applicant states that he has amended claim 1 in an attempt to further clarify the structural and functional relationship between the claimed apparatus and the artificial (physical model). As this is a system claim, the applicant has added some structural elements but has added the functional elements which are the intended use or functional relationship. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KESHA FRISBY whose telephone number is (571)272-8774. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 730AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xuan Thai can be reached at 571-272-7147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KESHA FRISBY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 12, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 29, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 24, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749411
INTERACTIVE CONVERSATIONAL CHATBOT FOR ENHANCING COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF INDIVIDUALS WITH LANGUAGE DIFFICULTIES
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743966
EYE-IMAGING TRAINING APPARATUS AND METHODS OF TRAINING
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738174
INTERACTIVE DIGITAL LEARNING PLATFORM SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12714913
MEASUREMENT STATION AND SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING THE FUNCTIONAL AGE OF A USER
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12718707
SUTURING SKILL SIMULATOR AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS
1y 12m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+23.2%)
3y 8m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 772 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month