Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/221,059

SYSTEM FOR ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY TRAINING

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 12, 2023
Examiner
FRISBY, KESHA
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Tactile Orthopaedics Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allow Rate
397 granted / 755 resolved
-17.4% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
781
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§103
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 755 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Poltaretskyi et al. (U.S. Publication Number 2019/0380792). Referring to claim 1, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses comprising: an apparatus for supporting at least one artificial model of the joint in at least one joint orientation position (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A), and at least one artificial model of the joint, releasably mounted to the apparatus, the apparatus configured for pivotal and rotatable movement of the artificial model within the at least one joint orientation position (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 2, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the apparatus may comprise: a base, and a manipulator arm mounted to the base, the manipulator arm configured to rotatably and pivotally receive the at least one artificial model of the joint (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 3, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the base further comprises: a base plate, a pedestal, and at least one T-bar connector for receiving and securing the manipulator arm (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 4, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the T-bar connector comprises at least two attachment posts for receiving and securing the manipulator arm in the at least one joint orientation position (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 5, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the manipulator arm further comprises at least one telescoping boom assembly (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 6, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the artificial model is a human joint (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 7, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the human joint is a shoulder joint (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 8, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the at least one joint orientation position comprises at least a beach chair position or a lateral decubitus position (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 9, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the apparatus is further configured to provide loading conditions on the at least one artificial model to mimic primary traction, secondary traction, flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, or internal/external rotation of the at least one artificial mode (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A)l. Referring to claim 10, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses comprising: a base, and a manipulator arm mounted to the base, the manipulator arm configured to rotatably and pivotally receive the at least one artificial model of the joint (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 11, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the base further comprises: a base plate, a pedestal, and at least one T-bar connector for receiving and securing the manipulator arm (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 12, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the T-bar connector comprises at least two attachment posts for receiving and securing the manipulator arm (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 13, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the manipulator arm may comprise: a sleeve for releasably mounting the manipulator arm to the base, and a boom assembly (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 14, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the boom assembly comprises a spring-biased piston assembly (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 15, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses comprising: at least one connector for releasably connecting the model to the apparatus in at least one surgical position (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 16, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the joint is a human joint (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 17, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the human joint is a shoulder joint (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 18, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the artificial model comprises one or more layers of artificial skin, fat, bones, muscles, tendons, ligaments, cartilage, or connecting soft tissue (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 19, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the model comprises at least a scapula bone and a humerus bone, and one of the at least one connectors connect the scapula bone to the apparatus and another one of the at least one connectors connect the humerus bone to the apparatus (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Referring to claim 20, Poltaretskyi et al. discloses wherein the model further comprises at least one of a rotator interval, a joint capsule, a musculotendinous junction, a tight or loose joint, cartilage, a labrum, a biceps tendon, or bones of different hardnesses (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11 A). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see amended claims 2-5, 13 & 14, filed 1/29/2026, with respect to 35 USC 112, 2nd paragraph have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 2-5, 13 & 14 have been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed 1/29/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues that the prior art teaches virtual versus physical components. However, the applicant has not positively recited physical components; therefore, the prior art still applies. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KESHA FRISBY whose telephone number is (571)272-8774. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 730AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xuan Thai can be reached at 571-272-7147. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KESHA FRISBY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 12, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 29, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586483
MODULAR CIRCUIT CARD ASSEMBLY FOR ADVANCED TRAINING APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573310
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING A VOCATIONAL MASK WITH A HYPER-ENABLED WORKER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12555489
Large Language Model-Enabled Artificial Intelligence-Based Virtual Interactive Reading Assistant
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12542066
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING PERSONALIZED INTERFACE CONTENT PLANS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12536920
TRANSFORMER TRAINING LAB
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+23.7%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 755 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month