Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/221,988

LOW-SPEED SENSORLESS BRUSHLESS MOTOR CONTROL IN A POWER TOOL

Non-Final OA §101§DP
Filed
Jul 14, 2023
Examiner
DHAKAL, BICKEY
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
BLACK & DECKER, INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
616 granted / 732 resolved
+16.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
775
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
41.8%
+1.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
§112
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 732 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 14 of prior U.S. Patent No. 11,750,124 B2. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Allowable Subject Matter The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claims 11-20 are allowed. Upon further consideration and in a view of the limitation, the prior art does not explicitly teach or fairly suggest alone or in combination the following: Claims 11-20 are allowable among other elements and details, but for at least the reason, “wherein in the low-speed commutation scheme, within a present sector of the plurality of sectors, the control unit pauses commutation of the present sector, applies a first voltage pulse to the present sector and a second voltage pulse to a next sector of the plurality of sectors, detects whether a transition of the rotor from the present sector to the next sector has occurred based on motor current measurements associated with the first voltage pulse and the second voltage pulse, resumes commutation of the present sector if the transition of the rotor from the present sector to the next sector is not detected, and starts commutation the next cycle if the transition of the rotor from the present sector to the next sector is detected.” Claims 2-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 2-10 depend on claim 1, which is allowable for reason “the control unit being configured to compare amplitudes of motor current measurements and detect the transition from the present sector to the next sector when the current measurement associated with one of the first plurality of voltage pulses has a larger amplitude than the current measurement associated with a corresponding one of the second plurality of voltage pulses.” Conclusion (No prior art rejection has been made for claim 1. Claim 1 has only been rejected under Double patenting as indicated above) The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Mackay (US 20070069677 A1) disclose commutation based on back emf and sector change. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BICKEY DHAKAL whose telephone number is (571)272-3577. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Han can be reached at 5712722078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BICKEY DHAKAL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2896
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 14, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600598
ELEVATOR SYSTEM HAVING A LASER DISTANCE MEASURING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603592
BATTERY HEATING SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD AND DEVICE THEREOF AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595153
ELEVATOR CAR IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589972
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN ELEVATOR INSTALLATION BY USING A COMPUTER-CONTROLLED MOBILE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592658
METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ELECTRIC MACHINE, DEVICE FOR OPERATING AN ELECTRIC MACHINE, AND ELECTRIC DRIVE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.5%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 732 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month