Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 12, 2026
Application No. 18/222,120

FURNITURE DRIVE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 14, 2023
Priority
Jan 27, 2021 — AT A 50040/2021 +1 more
Examiner
MORGAN, EMILY M
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Julius Blum GmbH
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
36%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
68%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 36% of cases
36%
Career Allowance Rate
360 granted / 1015 resolved
-16.5% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1067
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1015 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 2/4/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Drawings PNG media_image1.png 453 638 media_image1.png Greyscale The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. The drawings are not clear as to the distinction between “releasable securing device 19” and “fastening portion 38a”, and applicant does not disclose the use of both 19 and 38a at the same time. Please see 112b rejection below. Neither locking device engages the pivoting axis 7a. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1: Applicant claims “releasable securing device 19”, which is disclosed by applicant as “in addition to the locking device 38, a releasable securing device 19” on page 11 of the specification 7/14/2023, is claimed and disclosed to be distinct from the first locking device 38. However, based on figure 6b, the scope of “fastening portion 38a” and the scope of “releasable securing device 19” seem to be identical. If this is the case, the applicant should claim it as part of the “first locking device” 38 and not distinct from the “first locking device”, the releasable securing device 19 should be shown in all figures where it is present, like in figure 3b, and applicant should not use the term “fastening portion” intending to mean part 38a. The releasable securing device 19 is shown to directly engage locking element 38c, which is applicant’s claimed “first locking element” 38c, in the same manner that fastening portion 38a does. Regarding claim 7, “the first locking device includes a first fastening portion”, meaning that the fastening portion in claim 7 is part 38a. However claim 1’s “fastening portion” is part of the second locking device 37, not first locking device 38. Further, applicant claims a “releasable securing device” 19 in claim 1, which performs identical function as the claim 1 “releasable securing device”. The record is not clear how claim 7 further limits claim 1. Regarding claim 21, pivoting axis is disclosed as part 7a. Neither the first locking device 38 or the second locking device 37 engage part 7a. Second locking device 37 engages pin 7b, and First locking device 38 engages pin 39 (see figure 4a). Examiner suggests cancellation of claim 21. Dependent claims inherit the same issues from parent claims and do not resolve any indefinite issues. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7, 9-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EMILY M MORGAN whose telephone number is (303)297-4260. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs 8-5 MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at (571)272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EMILY M MORGAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
May 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 06, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 10, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698659
HINGES AND FOLDABLE DISPLAY DEVICES
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692740
REFRIGERATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12650042
FURNITURE FITTING
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12612941
FIELD SERVICEABLE LANDING GEAR BUSHING
6y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12577821
DOOR OPERATOR ARMATURE CONNECTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
36%
Grant Probability
68%
With Interview (+32.5%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1015 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month