Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/222,848

SYSTEM INCLUDING SEAT PAN ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 17, 2023
Examiner
BRINDLEY, TIMOTHY J
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
B/E Aerospace, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
958 granted / 1180 resolved
+29.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1231
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
§102
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§112
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1180 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Election/Restrictions Upon further consideration, Applicant's arguments with respect to the proper grouping of the election of species have been fully considered and are persuasive. Applicant’s election of their proposed Species A (figs. 4A-16) and subsequent election of claims 1-17 is accepted and deemed proper. Applicant additionally argues that examination of claims 1-20 poses no serious burden on the examiner. The Office disagrees. As discussed by Applicant, Figs. 17A-B disclose a separate, mutually exclusive mechanism for movement of the front portion of the seat which does not overlap in scope with Figs. 4A-16 and requires additional search and/or consideration. The requirement is deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cordes et al. (US 2020/0130537) (“Cordes”). Cordes discloses a system, comprising: a seat pan assembly, comprising: a fixed link having a fore end and an aft end (shown in the annotated figure below: the arm and pivot joint 22 are fixed to the front portion of the seat pan assembly); an aft driver link (fig. 2: 16a) having an aft driver link fore end and an aft driver link aft end, wherein the aft driver link fore end is pivotably coupled to the aft end of the fixed link (as shown by pivot point at the upper front corner of 20a); and a fore driven link (fig. 2: 16b) having a fore driven link fore end and a fore driven link aft end, wherein the fore driven link aft end is pivotably coupled to the fore end of the fixed link (fig. 2 shows 16b pivotably coupled to the front of 22); wherein, when a downward component force acts upon the aft driver link, the aft driver link aft end is configured to rotate about the aft end of the fixed link and cause the fore driven link fore end to rotate about the fore end of the fixed link such that the fore driven link fore end is configured to move at least partially in an upward direction and forward direction (as shown by the shaded lines of 16b in fig. 2). PNG media_image2.png 716 593 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 5 9 media_image3.png Greyscale As concerns claim 2, Cordes discloses an aircraft seat comprising the seat pan assembly (paragraph 0002). As concerns claim 3, Cordes discloses wherein, when the downward component force ceases acting upon the aft driver link, the aft driver link aft end is configured to rotate about the aft end of the fixed link and cause the fore driven link fore end to rotate about the fore end of the fixed link such that the fore driven link fore end is configured to move at least partially in a downward direction and aft direction (as shown in fig. 2). As concerns claim 5, Cordes discloses wherein the seat pan assembly further comprises: a driver train configured to transmit motion from the aft driver link to the fore driven link (fig. 2: 24, 26). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 and 6-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art reference of Cordes fails to teach: wherein the seat pan assembly further comprises: a second fixed link having a second fore end and a second aft end; a second aft driver link having a second aft driver link fore end and a second aft driver link aft end, wherein the second aft driver link fore end is pivotably coupled to the second aft end of the second fixed link; a second fore driven link having a second fore driven link fore end and a second fore driven link aft end, wherein the second fore driven link aft end is pivotably coupled to the second fore end of the second fixed link; an aft crossbar connected between the second aft driver link aft end and the aft driver link aft end; and a fore crossbar connected between the second fore driven link fore end and the fore driven link fore end; wherein, when the downward component force acts upon the second aft driver link, the second aft driver link aft end is configured to rotate about the second aft end of the second fixed link and cause the second fore driven link fore end to rotate about the second fore end of the second fixed link such that the second fore driven link fore end is configured to move at least partially in an upward direction and forward direction; or wherein the driver train comprises: a driver timing pulley; a driven pulley; and a timing belt installed around the driver timing pulley and the driven pulley. Further, there is no teaching, suggestion or motivation to modify the prior art absent hindsight. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY J BRINDLEY whose telephone number is (571)270-7231. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at 5712726670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY J BRINDLEY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 17, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600478
RECLINING SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600277
BACKREST FOR A VEHICLE SEAT AND A METHOD FOR MOUNTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595060
SEAT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588766
SEAT COMPRISING A FRAME AND A COVER, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583366
VEHICLE SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1180 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month