Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/223,162

PROCESS FOR THE TREATMENT OF THE PHOTOPOLYMER MATERIAL THAT CONSTITUTES THE MATRIX PLATES IN FLEXOGRAPHIC PRINTING

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 18, 2023
Examiner
BUTCHER, ROBERT T
Art Unit
1764
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
665 granted / 941 resolved
+5.7% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
65 currently pending
Career history
1006
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
49.4%
+9.4% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 941 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(a)-(d) by Application No. IT 102022000015600 filed 7/25/2022, which papers have been placed of record in the file. Claims 1-8 are pending. Claim Objections Claim 4 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 4 recites …powder the powder… and it appears Applicant intended to recite … Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites …inserting into a vacuum gauge for about 8-12 minutes, at a pressure of 45-55 mbar… However, a pressure gauge is a mechanical instrument used to measure and monitor pressure. Hence, it would not be understood to one skilled in the art how the mixture can be inserted into a vacuum gauge. Claims 2-8 are subsumed by this rejection because of their dependence. Claim 1 recites …carrying out a second cooling phase in a refrigerant that operates between -25 C and -35 C… However, a refrigerant is fluid that carries heat from a cold environment to a warm environment and circulating between them. Therefore, it would not be clear to one skilled in the art how a carry out a first phase of cooling in a refrigerant. Claim 1 recites the limitation “the cooling unit" in line 18. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 2-8 are subsumed by this rejection because of their dependence. Claim 1 recites …mixing said powder with a thermosetting resin and an amine hardener for a time of 1-3 minutes… then later recites …adding an amine catalyst for thermosetting resins… However, it would not be clear if the amine hardener and amine catalyst are the same or different. Claim 1 recites …pouring the mixture into a mold to leave it cross-linked at room temperature… It would not be clear how to pour the mixture into a mold to “to leave it crosslinked”. Specifically, it would not be clear if crosslinking occurs at room temperature for about 12-24 hours, or if it is previously crosslinked to leave it crosslinked. Claims 2-8 are subsumed by these rejections because of their dependence. Claim 1 recites several instances of "the mixture". However, it would not be clear what mixture is intended, since several mixtures can be deduced from claim 1. Specifically, a mixture of …said powder with a thermosetting resin and an amine hardener for a time of 1-3 minutes... and also another mixture which includes …adding an amine catalyst for thermosetting resins… Claim 2 recites the limitation "the photopolymer" in line 1 which lacks antecedent basis. It appears Applicant intended to recite “the photopolymer material”. Claim 7 recites the limitation "the freezing member" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 7 recites …the freezing member works at a temperature of 30 ˚C for a time of 30 minutes… While a freezer that operates between -25 ˚C and -35 ˚C is recited in claim 1, 30 ˚C is outside of this range, and a “freezing member” is not previously recited. Therefore, it would not be clear what freezer member works at a temperature of 30 ˚C for a time of 30 minutes. Claim 8 recites several instances of "the mixture in the mold". However, it would not be clear what mixture is intended, since several mixtures can be deduced from claim 1. Specifically, a mixture of …said powder with a thermosetting resin and an amine hardener for a time of 1-3 minutes... and also another mixture which includes …adding an amine catalyst for thermosetting resins… Appropriate correction and/or clarification is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The present claims are allowable over the closest prior art, Vest et al. (US 2022/0235551) for the following reasons: Vest is directed to a process of producing a granulated product from photopolymer printing pate materials. The process comprises shredding into pieces smaller than 10 mm in each direction, which can include cryogenic process ([0047]-[0051] Vest). However, further mixing with a thermosetting resin and an amine hardener, a first phase and second phase of mixing, cooling, crosslinking and heating in an oven is not mentioned or suggested. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT T BUTCHER whose telephone number is (571)270-3514. The examiner can normally be reached Telework M-F 9-5 Pacific Time Zone. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lanee Reuther can be reached at (571) 270-7026. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT T BUTCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1764
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 18, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600874
AQUEOUS PIGMENTED INK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600086
BINDER SYSTEM AND DEVICES FOR 3-D PRINTING AND ARTICLES PRODUCED THEREFROM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584001
HIGH EFFICACY CU-BASED ANTI-MICROBIAL FILMS AND SUBSTRATES AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577340
STORAGE STABLE TWO-COMPONENT DUAL CURE DENTAL COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577406
RESIN COMPOSITION, FILM, AND MULTILAYER STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+18.4%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 941 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month