Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/223,642

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING REDUNDANT STEERING SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 19, 2023
Examiner
BRAUCH, CHARLES JOSEPH
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
968 granted / 1185 resolved
+11.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1217
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
31.7%
-8.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1185 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION 1. This Final Office Action is in response to the Amendment filed February 4, 2026. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 2. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 3. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 4. Claim(s) 1 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the Kim reference (US Patent Publication No. 2021/0094611). 5. Regarding claim 1, the Kim reference discloses: an apparatus for controlling a redundant steering system (FIGS) comprising: a first steering position controller (100) configured to control a first motor driven power steering (MDPS) module [Paragraph 0067—the steering angle correction module (100) outputs to (200) and therefore at least partially controls the operation of (200) which controls the MDPS module] based on a first command steering angle from an autonomous driving system [Paragraph 0067—command steering angle (FIG. 1)] and a current steering angle [Paragraph 0057]; a second steering position controller (200); an internal communication interface configured to enable a communication between the first steering position controller (100) and the second steering position controller (200); and a processor [Paragraph 0037] configured to calculate final output information including the current steering angle [Paragraph 0057] based on first information output from the first MDPS module [Paragraph 0066], and to apply the final output information to the first steering position controller and the second steering position controller (FIG. 1), wherein the first steering position controller (100) and the second steering position controller (200) each: transmit and receive the first command steering angle (FIG. 1—unmodified S10) and the second command steering angle (FIG. 1—modified steering angle S26) to and from each other through the internal communication interface (FIG. 1—connects 100 and 200); calculate a third command steering angle based on the first command steering angle and the second command steering angle (FIG. 8—further modification of steering angle S28); and control the corresponding MDPS module based on the third command steering angle (FIG. 8—S50). The Kim reference discloses the invention is essentially claimed. However, the Kim reference fails to disclose a controller configured to control a second MDPS module based on a second command steering angle from the autonomous driving system and the current steering angle and second information output from the second MDPS module. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art by the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a second MDPS module that functions identically to the first MDPS module, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 2144.04 (VI-B). 6. Regarding claim 11, the Kim reference further discloses: a method of controlling a redundant steering system including a first position steering controller (100) and a second position steering controller (200), the method comprising: controlling, by each of the first position steering controller (100) and the second position steering controller (200), a first MDPS module [Paragraph 0067] and based on a command steering angle [Paragraph 0067] and a current steering angle [Paragraph 0057]; and calculating, by a processor [Paragraph 0037], final output information (FIG. 8) including the current steering angle [Paragraph 0057] based on first information output from the first MDPS module (100) (FIG. 1), and applying the final output information to a first steering position controller (100) and a second steering position controller (200). The Kim reference discloses the invention is essentially claimed. However, the Kim reference fails to disclose a controller configured to control a second MDPS module second information output from the second MDPS module. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art by the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a second MDPS module that functions identically to the first MDPS module, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 2144.04 (VI-B). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-10 and 12-15 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed February 4, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The Applicant disputes the finding of the Office that adding a second MDPS module is mere duplication. However, when mapping the claims to the disclosure of the Kim reference each and every feature of the rejected claims is taught except this duplication. Moreover, adding physical redundancy is a well known concept in the area of motors and a person of ordinary skill in the art would certainly recognize that such a well known concept could easily be utilized in the Kim reference by adding a second MDPS module. Accordingly, claims 1 and 11 are finally rejected. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES J BRAUCH whose telephone number is (313)446-6511. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 AM to 6 PM. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lindsay Low can be reached at (571) 272-1196. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARLES JOSEPH BRAUCH/ Examiner Art Unit 3747 /LONG T TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 04, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600330
Sensor assembly for a vehicle and multi-circuit braking system
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600392
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600365
DETERMINATION OF VALUE REPRESENTATIVE OF AGGRESSIVENESS IN OPERATION OF A TRANSPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583512
CONTROL DEVICE, ELECTRIC POWER STEERING DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12559107
RANGE PREDICTION FOR VEHICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.2%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1185 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month