Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/224,103

AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLE CHARGE SHOE CLEANER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 20, 2023
Examiner
HENSON, KATINA N
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Lincoln Global Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
344 granted / 631 resolved
-15.5% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
77 currently pending
Career history
708
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 631 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Status of Claims Claims 1 – 16 are pending. Claims 17 – 26 are allowed. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/20/2023 was filed before the first office action. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 6 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhai (CN 217623489 U) – as cited by Applicant. Regarding Independent Claim 1, Zhai teaches a charging contact cleaner (Figs. 1 and 2) for an automated guided vehicle (AGV; Paragraphs [n0001] – [n0003]), comprising: a charging contact cleaning station located along a travel path of one or more AGVs (Paragraphs [n0002]), wherein the charging contact cleaning station (Fig. 2) comprises: at least one cleaning brush (cleaning brush, 6); and an actuator (push rod, 4) operatively connected to the at least one cleaning brush (6), wherein the at least one cleaning brush (6) simultaneously engages first and second charging contacts deployed from the AGV at the charging contact cleaning station (the limitation is directed toward the intended use of the brush as the AGV is not positively claimed; however, the brush od Zhai is capable of being used in such a manner as described since the electric push rod 4 drives the cleaning brush 6 to contact the chassis and move back and forth to clean the chassis position (Paragraph [n0022]), and wherein the at least one cleaning brush (6) is automatically moved by the actuator (4) relative to the first and second charging contacts for a predetermined cleaning duration to clean respective surfaces of the first and second charging contacts (Paragraph [n0025]). Regarding Claims 6 and 15, Zhai teaches the charging contact cleaner (Figs. 1 and 2) wherein the actuator (4) comprises a motor (Paragraph [n0013]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 2 – 5, 9 and 10 – 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhai (CN 217623489 U) – as cited by Applicant Regarding Claims 2 and 10, Zhai teaches the charging contact cleaner (Figs. 1 and 2) wherein the at least one cleaning brush (6) comprises a first cleaning brush and a second cleaning brush (Fig. 2). Zhai does not explicitly teach the second cleaning brush is electrically insulated from the first cleaning brush; however, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the cleaner of Zhai to further include the second cleaning brush is electrically insulated from the first cleaning brush, as claimed, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art (MPEP 2144.04). Duplicating the electrical components would allow for isolation of the two brushes and further protect the system and reduce electrical noises. Regarding Claims 3 and 11, Zhai teaches the charging contact cleaner (Figs. 1 and 2) of claim 1, as discussed above. Although Zhai teaches a base and brushes made out of a material, the reference does not explicitly teach wherein the at least one cleaning brush includes a plastic base and metallic wire bristles. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the cleaner of Zhai to further include a plastic base and metallic wire bristles since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use of the cleaner (MPEP 2144.07). Regarding Claims 4 and 12, Zhai teaches the charging contact cleaner (Figs. 1 and 2) wherein the actuator (push rod, 4) is a linear actuator (Fig. 2). Zhai, however, teaches an electric actuator and does not explicitly teach the pneumatic actuator; however, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of th claimed invention to modify the actuator of Zhai to further include it being a pneumatic actuator, as claimed, because these two actuators were art-recognized equivalents before the effective filing date of the claimed invention and one of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to substitute an electric actuator for a pneumatic actuator. Regarding Claims 5 and 13, Zhai teaches the charging contact cleaner (Figs. 1 and 2) further comprising a mobile carriage (movable frame, 3) and a rail (lead screw, 2) that supports movements of the carriage (3), wherein the actuator (4) is operatively connected to the at least one cleaning brush (6) through the mobile carriage (3; Fig. 2). Regarding Independent Claim 9, Zhai teaches a charging contact cleaner (Figs. 1 and 2) for an automated guided vehicle (AGV; Paragraphs [n0001] – [n0003]), comprising: a charging contact cleaning station located along a travel path of one or more AGVs (Paragraphs [n0002]), wherein the charging contact cleaning station comprises: a flush-to-floor enclosure (support platform, 1); at least one cleaning brush (6) located within the flush-to-floor enclosure (1); and an actuator (4) located within the flush-to-floor enclosure (1) and operatively connected to the at least one cleaning brush (6), wherein the at least one cleaning brush (6) simultaneously engages first and second charging contacts deployed from the AGV at the charging contact cleaning station (the limitation is directed toward the intended use of the brush as the AGV is not positively claimed; however, the brush od Zhai is capable of being used in such a manner as described since the electric push rod 4 drives the cleaning brush 6 to contact the chassis and move back and forth to clean the chassis position (Paragraph [n0022]), and wherein the at least one cleaning brush (6) is automatically moved by the actuator relative to the first and second charging contacts to clean respective surfaces of the first and second charging contacts (Paragraph [n0022]). Zhai does not explicitly teach the flush to floor enclosure is recessed in a floor on which the AGV travels; however, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the cleaner of Zhai to further include the flush to floor enclosure is recessed in a floor on which the AGV travels, as claimed, since it has been held that forming in one piece an article which has formerly been formed in two pieces and put together involves only routine skill in the art. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7 and 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Although Zhai teaches a charging contact cleaner comprising a flush to floor enclosure, the reference fails to teach, suggest or make obvious a debris catch tray located within the flush-to-floor enclosure, wherein the debris catch tray is operatively connected to the actuator, and the at least one cleaning brush is mounted within the debris catch tray. Claim 8 is further objected to as being a dependent or objected claim 7. Claim 16 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Although Zhai teaches a charging contact cleaner comprising a flush to floor enclosure, the reference fails to teach, suggest or make obvious the flush-to-floor enclosure includes a cover plate, and the cover plate has an opening aligned with the at least one cleaning brush such that the at least one cleaning brush is exposed when the cover plate is attached to the flush-to-floor enclosure. Claim 17 is allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The instant invention is neither anticipated nor rendered obvious by the prior art because the prior art fails to teach, suggest or make obvious an automated guided vehicle (AGV) fleet system, comprising: a plurality AGVs located within a facility, each AGV having first and second deployable charging contacts for receiving charging current to charge a battery of the AGV; and a facility supervisory system in communication with the plurality of AGVs and the charging contact cleaning station. Claims 18 – 26 are further allowed. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATINA N HENSON whose telephone number is (571)272-8024. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday; 5:30am to 3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Carter can be reached at 571-272-4475. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATINA N. HENSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 20, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593949
CLEANING DEVICE AND USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593950
WAND WITH INTEGRAL HOSE CLEANOUT FEATURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588749
POOL CLEANING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582224
Determining a Pressure Associated with an Oral Care Device, and Methods Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575512
Debris Blower
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+31.9%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 631 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month