Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/224,573

Process of making an eccentric threaded fastener

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 21, 2023
Examiner
TOLAN, EDWARD THOMAS
Art Unit
3725
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
1035 granted / 1324 resolved
+8.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1366
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
50.8%
+10.8% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1324 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamazaki (6,966,735) in view of Rast (1,457,749) and further in view of Hattan (4,545,104). Yamazaki discloses a method of forming an eccentric fastener including first and second locking fasteners comprising polyhedron hex washers (Figs. 4A,4B) and hex nuts (18; Fig. 10) which are configured to be rotatable relative to one another eccentrically (col. 16, lines 21-28). Yamazaki discloses (col. 16, lines 6-16) that a pair of nuts (18; Fig. 10) include a drilled circular section axial hole (18, col. 6, line 11) and each include a first vertical surface (7, left Fig. 10), a spiral surface (6) and a second vertical surface (7, right Fig. 10) with a gap (bounding 6,6,7,7; Fig. 10) formed during relative rotation of the nuts defined by the spiral surface (6; col. 16, lines 12-13) between the first vertical surface (7) and the second vertical surface (7). Yamazaki discloses that a tap (20) is used to create a female screw thread in the nuts (18) after they are rotated to the gap position (Fig. 10; col. 16, lines 18-20). Regarding step (b), directions of upward, downward, counterclockwise and clockwise are not set forth in the claim but the first surface (7) of Yamazaki extends vertically upward and the spiral surface (6) extends in a counterclockwise direction (left of first surface 7; Fig. 10). shoulder 7). Yamazaki discloses that a cutting operation is used to form the spiral surface (6) and first vertical surface (7; col. 12, lines 9-12) but does not disclose that the first surface and the spiral surface are cut in an integral nut blank. Rast teaches cutting a groove (4) in a nut blank (1) prior to threading (page 1, col. 1, lines 43-48) and that a first nut portion (2) and a second nut portion (1) are separated into separate nuts (2,3) when they are relatively rotated (page 1, col. 2, lines 66-70). It would have been obvious to the skilled artisan prior to the effective filing date of the present invention to cut the first surface and spiral surface of Yamazaki into a nut blank as taught by Rast in order to manufacture two nut portions from a single nut blank so that the cut surfaces on each nut portion match. Yamazaki discloses that the first and second fastener portions are fixed together by adhesive tape (col. 5, lines 12-37) but does not disclose welding. Hattan teaches (col. 4, lines 19-25) that a first nut portion (18) and a second nut portion (19) have faces (22,23) that are attached by welding (24). It would have been obvious to the skilled artisan prior to the effective filing date of the present invention to weld the first and second nut portion of Yamazaki together as taught by Hattan in order to hold the nut portions in place. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 6-23-2005 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Yamazaki discloses that a polyhedron body comprises a pair of nuts (18) that include a spiral surface (6) and vertical surfaces (7) which are formed by cutting (col. 12, lines 9-12) and Rast teaches forming a pair of nut portions (1,2) from an integral blank (page 1, col. 1, lines 42-45) by cutting a groove (4) into the integral blank and rotating the pair of nut portions to separate them (page 1, col. 2, lines 65-70). It would have been obvious to the skilled artisan to cut the pair of nuts of Yamazaki from an integral polyhedron blank as taught by Rast. Yamazaki discloses that the nut portions are held together by adhesive tape and Hattan teaches that nut portions are held together by welding, it is an obvious design choice to use welding or adhesion to hold two parts together. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWARD THOMAS TOLAN whose telephone number is (571)272-4525. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris Templeton can be reached at 571-270-1477. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWARD T TOLAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 21, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 23, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 06, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599953
METHOD FOR FORMING AND HEAT TREATING NEAR NET SHAPE COMPLEX STRUCTURES FROM SHEET METAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599948
Method and computer program product for calculating a pass schedule for a stable rolling process
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601189
ADJUSTABLE STOPPER ASSEMBLY FOR PRESS BRAKE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599954
HYDRAULIC FORMING MACHINE FOR PRESSING WORKPIECES, IN PARTICULAR FORGING HAMMER, AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A HYDRAULIC FORMING MACHINE, IN PARTICULAR A FORGING HAMMER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596345
FORMING STYLUS TOOL DESIGN AND TOOLPATH GENERATION MODULE FOR 3 AXIS COMPUTER NUMERICAL CONTROL MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+15.8%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1324 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month