Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/224,909

DISPLAY APPARATUS AND MULTI-SCREEN DISPLAY APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 21, 2023
Examiner
BREVAL, ELMITO
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
1052 granted / 1380 resolved
+8.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1423
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.6%
+11.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1380 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-10 and 27-31 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by Jeon et al. (US. Pub: 2021/0202676A1~hereinafter “Jeon”). Regarding claim 1, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-8) a display apparatus comprising: a substrate (100) including a display area (AA; [0084]) including a plurality of pixels (P; [0084]) disposed along a first direction and a second direction intersecting with the first direction (see at least fig. 1A; i.e. the X and Y directions; [0091]-[0092]); a gate driving circuit (150; abstract; [0013]-[0014]; [0140]-[0141]) disposed at the display area, the gate driving circuit including a plurality of branch circuits (151; [0223]-[0224]) configured to supply a scan signal to the plurality of pixels (abstract; [0014]); and a plurality of lines (GCL; [0142]-[0144]; [0383]; [0384]; figs. 6-8 and 11) disposed at a region between two pixels adjacent to each other along the first direction among the plurality of pixels (see at least fig. 6), the plurality of lines (GCL) extending in the second direction and selectively connected to the plurality of branch circuits (best seen at least fig. 11), wherein a number of lines (GL) disposed at a region between the two pixels adjacent to each other along the first direction is the same (see at least fig. 6). Regarding claim 2, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-8) all lateral surfaces of the display area are provided in a structure which directly contacts air ([0088]). Regarding claim 3, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-8; abstract; [0021]) a pad part disposed in the display area and having a plurality of pads connected to each of the plurality of pixels and the gate driving circuit. Regarding claim 4, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-8; abstract; [0021]-[0022]) the pad part is disposed in an outmost pixel disposed at a periphery portion of the substrate parallel to the first direction. Regarding claim 5, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-8) the gate driving circuit (150) further includes a branch network (153) electrically connecting the plurality of branch circuits (see at least fig. 6). Regarding claim 7, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-8; [0225]) the branch network (153) includes a plurality of control nodes and a plurality of network lines extending in parallel to the first direction (see at least figs. 6 and 7), and wherein each of the plurality of control nodes is electrically connected to a gate electrode of a thin film transistor included in one or more of the plurality of branch circuits ([0222]-[0227]). Regarding claim 8, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-11) some of the plurality of control nodes (Q, QBo and QBe) and some of the plurality of network lines are configured to share the plurality of branch circuits arranged adjacent to one another along the second direction ([0391]-[0393]). Regarding claim 9, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-8) the display area comprises: a plurality of pixel groups each including two or more adjacent pixels (see at least figs. 1A and 4), and each of the plurality of branch circuits (151) is disposed between the plurality of pixel groups. Regarding claim 10, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-8; [0143]; [0803]) the plurality of lines comprise: a gate control line, a carry signal line, and a dummy line, and the plurality of lines disposed at the region between two pixels adjacent to each other along the first direction comprise the gate control line and the dummy line, or comprise the carry signal line and the dummy line. Regarding claim 27, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-17) a rear substrate (200; [0146]) coupled to a rear surface of the substrate (100) by using a coupling member (300; [0147]); and a routing portion disposed at an outer surface of the substrate and an outer surface of the rear substrate (see at least abstract; figs. 4 and 5; [0128]), the routing portion including a plurality of routing lines connected to the plurality of pixels (see at least figs. 4 and 5). Regarding claim 28, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-17) each of the plurality of pixels comprises: an emission part including a light emitting device (see figs. 15-17); and a transmissive part at a periphery of the emission part (see at least figs. 4, 7, 14-17), and wherein each of the plurality of branch circuits is disposed at the transmissive part (see at least figs. 1-17). Regarding claim 29, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-17 and 36-88) a multi-screen display apparatus (at least title), comprising: a plurality of display apparatuses, wherein each of the plurality of display apparatuses is the display apparatus of claim 1, and wherein the plurality of display apparatuses are disposed along at least one direction among the first direction and the second direction intersecting with the first direction ([0021]-[0022]). Regarding claim 30, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-17 and 36-38) each of the plurality of pixels disposed at a display area of each of the plurality of display apparatuses comprises: an emission part including a light emitting device (ED; see at least figs. 6, 15-17); and a transmissive part at a periphery of the emission part (see at least figs. 15-17 and 36-38), and wherein each of the plurality of branch circuits (1511 to 151n) is disposed at the transmissive part (see figs. 4, 7 and 14). Regarding claim 31, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-17 and 36-38; [0943]-[0949]) the multi-screen display apparatus of claim 29, wherein in a first display apparatus (100) and a second display apparatus adjacent to each other along the first direction and the second direction among the plurality of display apparatuses (see at least figs. 36-38), a distance between a center portion of an outermost pixel of the first display apparatus and a center portion of an outermost pixel of the second display apparatus is less than or equal to a pixel pitch ([0945]; see at least fig. 38), and wherein the pixel pitch is a distance between center portions of two adjacent pixels disposed at each of the plurality of display apparatuses (see at least fig. 38). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 6 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jeon et al. (US. Pub: 2021/0202676A1~hereinafter “Jeon”). Regarding claim 6, Jeon discloses all the claimed limitations except for the branch network includes a transparent conductive material configured to transmit light. However, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 1-34; [0223]) “The plurality of branch circuits 1511 to 151n may be selectively connected to the lines of the gate control line group GCL through the branch network 153 and may be electrically connected to one another through the branch network 153.” It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to consider using a transparent conductive material to form the branch network of Jeon, since it has been held that the selection of a known material based on its suitability for its intended use supported a prima facie obviousness determination. Regarding claim 11, Jeon does not expressly disclose the carry signal line has a length corresponding to a size of four adjacent pixels along the second direction. However, Jeon discloses (in at least figs. 6-8 and 11; [0383]) the display device comprised of, in part, a plurality of carry signal lines ([0383]) disposed at a region between two pixels adjacent to each other along the first direction among the plurality of pixels (see at least fig. 6). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to consider forming the carry signal line of Jeon with a length corresponding to a size of the four adjacent pixels along the second direction through design choice. Applicant has not disclosed the recited length is for a particular unobvious purpose, produces an unexpected results, and it appears prima facie the process would possess utility using the carry signal line length of Jeon. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12-26 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELMITO BREVAL whose telephone number is (571)270-3099. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th~ 7:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James R. Greece can be reached at 571-272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ELMITO BREVAL Primary Examiner Art Unit 2875 /ELMITO BREVAL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 21, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604529
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604576
DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595409
HIGH LUMINOUS EFFICACY PHOSPHOR CONVERTED WHITE LEDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595888
Broad View Headlamp
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593600
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1380 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month