Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/225,163

AUDIO-VISUAL DATA MANAGING SYSTEM, AUDIO-VISUAL DATA MANAGING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 24, 2023
Priority
Jul 25, 2022 — TW 111127778
Examiner
MONTOYA, OSCHTA I
Art Unit
2421
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
394 granted / 556 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
584
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
86.3%
+46.3% vs TC avg
§102
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 556 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 10/08/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Chiang does not teach “to pre-connect a second transmitting circuit of the transmitting circuits to one of the data receiving circuits according to predicting information which is recorded”. To this matter the examiner respectfully disagrees. Chiang teaches that a predicting channel is pre-locked with a tuner (paragraph 18-26), meeting the claim language since a receiving circuit, the tuner, is pre-locked or preconnected to the predicted channel and then the content is transmitted to the client device in that locked channel (figure 1 and 2), the claim language is met. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 5-14 and 16-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the Laksono in view of Chiang et al., US 2012/0144442. Regarding claim 5, Laksono discloses an audio-visual managing system, applied to at least one data receiving circuit which receives audio-visual data and outputs processed audio-visual data, each of the data receiving circuit comprising a tuner or a demodulator (figures 1 and 12), the audio-visual managing system comprising: a plurality of transmitting circuits, configured to stream the processed audio-visual data, a first transmitting circuit of the transmitting circuits receiving the processed audio-visual data output by a first data receiving circuit of the data receiving circuits (figures 1 and 12; paragraph 86-93 and 167-177). Laksono is silent about an predicting circuit, configured to pre-connect a second transmitting circuit of the transmitting circuits to one of the data receiving circuits according to predicting information which is recorded. In an analogous art, Chiang discloses an predicting circuit, configured to pre-connect a second transmitting circuit of the transmitting circuits to one of the data receiving circuits according to predicting information which is recorded (paragraph 18-26). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Laksono’s system with the teachings of Chiang. The motivation would have been to reduce latency when changing channels for the benefit of providing quality of service. Regarding claim 6, Laksono and Chiang disclose the audio-visual managing system of claim 5, the audio-visual data being cable TV data, Internet Protocol TV data, or a personal video file (Laksono figure 1; Chiang figure 1). Regarding claim 7, Laksono and Chiang disclose the audio-visual managing system of claim 5, the predicting circuit pre-connecting the second transmitting circuit to the first data receiving circuit according to the predicting information (Chiang paragraph 18-26). Regarding claim 8, Laksono and Chiang disclose the audio-visual managing system of claim 5, wherein the predicting circuit pre-connects the second transmitting circuit to a second data receiving circuit of the data receiving circuits according to the predicting information (Chiang paragraph 18-26). Regarding claim 9, Laksono and Chiang disclose the audio-visual managing system of claim 5, the predicting information comprising time information of different audio-visual data watched in a predetermine time, the predicting circuit pre-connecting the second transmitting circuit to one of the data receiving circuits according to the time information (Chiang paragraph 18-26). Regarding claim 10, Laksono and Chiang disclose the audio-visual managing system of claim 5, the predicting information comprising a corresponding relation between users and watched frequencies of different audio-visual data, the predicting circuit pre-connecting the second transmitting circuit to one of the data receiving circuits according to the corresponding relation (Chiang paragraph 18-26). Regarding claim 11, Laksono discloses an audio-visual managing method, applied to at least one data receiving circuit which receives audio-visual data and outputs processed audio-visual data, each of the data receiving circuit comprising a tuner or a demodulator (figures 1 and 12), the audio-visual managing method comprising: receiving the processed audio-visual data output by a first data receiving circuit by a first transmitting circuit and a second transmitting circuit of the transmitting circuits (figures 1 and 12; paragraph 86-93 and 167-177); and simultaneously using the processed audio-visual data which is output by the first data receiving circuit, via the first transmitting circuit and the second transmitting circuit (figures 1 and 12; paragraph 86-93 and 167-177); pre-connecting a third transmitting circuit to the first data receiving circuit according to predicting information which is recorded Laksono is silent about pre-connecting a third transmitting circuit to the first data receiving circuit according to predicting information which is recorded. In an analogous art, Chiang discloses pre-connecting a third transmitting circuit to the first data receiving circuit according to predicting information which is recorded (paragraph 18-26). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Laksono’s method with the teachings of Chiang. The motivation would have been to reduce latency when changing channels for the benefit of providing quality of service. Regarding claim 12, Laksono and Chiang disclose the audio-visual managing method of claim 11, further comprising: using different play programs to simultaneously play audio-visual data, which are generated via the first transmitting circuit and the second transmitting circuit and according to the processed audio-visual data output by the first data receiving circuit (Laksono figures 1 and 12; paragraph 86-93 and 167-177). Regarding claim 13, Laksono and Chiang disclose the audio-visual managing method of claim11, comprising: playing audio-visual data which is generated via the first transmitting circuit and according to the processed audio-visual data output by the first data receiving circuit, and storing audio-visual data which is generated via the second transmitting circuit and according to the processed audio-visual data output by the first data receiving circuit (Laksono figures 1 and 12; paragraph 86-93 and 167-177). Regarding claim 14, Laksono and Chiang disclose the audio-visual managing method of claim 11, the audio-visual data being cable TV data, Internet Protocol TV data, or a personal video file (Laksono figures 1 and 12; paragraph 86-93 and 167-177). Regarding claim 16, Laksono and Chiang disclose the audio-visual managing method of claim 15, further comprising: pre-connecting the third transmitting circuit to the first data receiving circuit according to the predicting information (Chiang paragraph 18-26). Regarding claim 17, Laksono and Chiang disclose the audio-visual managing method of claim 15, further comprising: pre-connecting the third transmitting circuit to a second data receiving circuit of the data receiving circuits according to the predicting information (Chiang paragraph 18-26). Regarding claim 18, Laksono and Chiang disclose the audio-visual managing method of claim 15, the predicting information comprising time information of different audio-visual data watched in a predetermine time (Chiang paragraph 18-26). Regarding claim 19, Laksono and Chiang disclose the audio-visual managing method of claim 15, the predicting information comprising a corresponding relation between users and watched frequencies of different audio-visual data (Chiang paragraph 18-26). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OSCHTA I MONTOYA whose telephone number is (571)270-1192. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8 am - 5 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Flynn can be reached on 571-272-1915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. OM Oschta Montoya Patent Examiner Art Unit 2421 /OSCHTA I MONTOYA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2421
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 24, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 08, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 22, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604062
ENHANCING MEDIA CONSUMPTION EXPERIENCE THROUGH GENERATIVE AI-POWERED INTERACTIVE COMPANIONS
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604067
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SELECTIVE CONTENT DISTRIBUTION
1y 11m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604048
User control of replacement television advertisements inserted by a smart television
1y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12581152
SAME-SCREEN INTERACTION CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 1m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581163
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DELIVERING USER SPECIFIC MESSAGES
1y 11m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+14.8%)
3y 0m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 556 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month