Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/225,999

CROSS LINK INTERFERENCE REPORTING IN 5G COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 25, 2023
Examiner
ELNOUBI, SAID M
Art Unit
2644
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
298 granted / 408 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
438
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
57.8%
+17.8% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 408 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03/16/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 03/04/2026, with respect to 112(a) rejections of claims 21-22, 24-25, and 27-28 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 112(a) rejections of claims 21-22, 24-25, and 27-28 have been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed 03/04/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues, on page 10 second paragraph, that Faxer does not disclose “a single configuration that simultaneously identifies the measurements, occasions, report type, and reporting resources” as required by independent claims and 11. However, the applicant admits that Faxer discloses configuring resources for performing measurements and separately discloses report configurations that indicate how and when measurements are reported. It is noted that Faxer [0033] discloses a single configuring report trigger state defining both resource configuration and CSI report configuration. Since a single configuration or separate configurations are two obvious design choices for a person of ordinary skill in the art, independent claims 1 and 11 are obvious in view of Faxer considered as a whole. Therefore, independent claims 1 and 11 and 17 are rejected under 103. Applicant argues, on page 11 first paragraph, that Faxer does not disclose layer 1 signaling in which DCI explicitly reuses or points to PUCCH resources defined for CLI reporting. The examiner respectfully disagrees. Faxer [0108] discloses “The UE is also given a UL resource allocation by the DCI whereon the CLI measurement report is to be transmitted ... scheduling of a PUCCH”. Applicant argues, on page 11 same paragraph, that Faxer does not disclose coordination of resources between CLI reporting and HARQ reporting. The examiner respectfully disagrees. Faxer multiplexing of CLI report with HARQ Ack report in [0108] is a coordination between the reports. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 7-8, 10-11, 13, 16, 21-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Faxer et al. (WO 2020144624 A1). Regarding claim 1, Faxer et al. teach A method for generating and reporting a cross link interference (CLI) report in a wireless network (Faxer [0002] Cross-Link Interference (CLI) measurement configuration and reporting in a cellular communications system,), the method comprising: receiving, by an electronic device within the wireless network, a CLI report configuration (Faxer [0033] Thus, each CSI report trigger state defines at least the following information: • Resource configurations o CSI-RS resource for channel measurement, o Interference measurement resource for interference measurement, • CSI report configuration: o the type of CSI report, i.e. wideband or subband, Type I or Type II codebook used, etc, Faxer [0080] The UE is also configured with one or more report configurations, which indicate how the CLI measurements are to be reported, , Faxer [0084] the base station 502 transmits one or more RRC messages to the wireless device 512 that configure CLI measurement(s) to be performed by the wireless device 512 , Faxer [0108] the UE is instructed to transmit a CLI measurement report based on receiving a DL Control Information (DCI).Note: it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the examined application to have received the CLI configuration as a single control information or multiple separate control information elements as an obvious design choice). configuring the electronic device to measure a CLI resource identified in the CLI report configuration (Faxer [0038] the information that configures a CLI measurement to be performed by the wireless device, ., [0084] configures the time and frequency resources on which the CLI measurements are to be performed); performing, by the electronic device, a CLI measurement of a CLI resource identified in the CLI report configuration over one or more CLI measurement occasions identified in the CLI report configuration to provide one or more CLI measurements (Faxer [0084] the RRC message(s) may include a measurement object(s) that configure the CLI measurement(s) to be performed (e.g., configures the time and frequency resources on which the CLI measurements are to be performed by the wireless device 512, ... The wireless device 512 performs a CLI measurement(s) in accordance with the received configuration(s)) identified in the CLI report configuration (Faxer [0084] The wireless device 512 performs a CLI measurement(s) in accordance with the received configuration(s)); generating, by the electronic device, a CLI report of the one or more CLI measurements (Faxer [0078] The signal measurements could further be configured to be processed by the UE before reporting it to the NN, Faxer [0084] reports the CLI measurement(s) in accordance with a CLI report type identified in the CLI report configuration ([0108] The UE then either collects a previously measured CLI measurement stored in memory (for instance based on periodic or semi-persistent CLI-IMR) or performs a new CLI measurement based on aperiodic CLI-IMR.); and reporting, by the electronic device, the CLI report over one or more resources identified in the CLI report configuration to another electronic device within the wireless network (Faxer [0084] reports the CLI measurement(s) to the base station 502, e.g., in accordance with associated report configuration(s))) . Regarding claim 7, FAXÉR et al. teach the method of claim 1, wherein the reporting comprises reporting the CLI report over one or more Layer 1 resources identified in the CLI report configuration (Faxer [0108] The UE is also given a UL resource allocation by the DCI whereon the CLI measurement report is to be transmitted. Such a UL resource allocation may typically comprise the scheduling of a PUSCH but may also comprise the scheduling of a PUCCH. Note: the PUSCH or PUCCH are physical channels defined on layer 1 by 3GPP). Regarding claim 8, Faxer et al. teach the method of claim 7, wherein the one or more Layer 1 resources comprise a Physical Uplink Control Channel (PUCCH) that is identified by the CLI report configuration (Faxer [0108] The UE is also given a UL resource allocation by the DCI whereon the CLI measurement report is to be transmitted. Such a UL resource allocation may typically comprise the scheduling of a PUSCH but may also comprise the scheduling of a PUCCH.) and Downlink Control Information (DCI) for use for in a Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) report (Faxer [0108] the UE is instructed to transmit a CLI measurement report based on receiving a DL Control Information (DCI)... The CLI report may then be multiplexed in UCI potentially together with other UCI content such as Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) Acknowledgement (ACK), Scheduling Request (SR), or other CSI reports and transmitted on the PUSCH or PUCCH). Regarding claim 10, Faxer et al. teach the method of claim 9, , wherein the reporting comprises reporting the CLI report over one or more Layer 2 resources identified in the DCI report configuration(Faxer [0083] the transmission is carried out using a Medium Access Control (MAC) Control Element (CE), Faxer [0108] the UE is instructed to transmit a CLI measurement report based on receiving a DL control information (DCI)) and wherein the one or more Layer 2 resources comprise a Media Access Control-Control Element (MAC-CE) (Faxer [0083] the transmission is carried out using a Medium Access Control (MAC) Control Element (CE))) on resources of a Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) identified in the CLI report configuration (Faxer [0108] The CLI report may then be multiplexed in UCI potentially together with other UCI content such as Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) Acknowledgement (ACK), Scheduling Request (SR), or other CSI reports and transmitted on the PUSCH) Regarding claim 11, FAXÉR et al. teach An electronic device, comprising: a transceiver configured to receive Downlink Control Information (DCI) having a CLI report configuration (Faxer [0033] Thus, each CSI report trigger state defines at least the following information: • Resource configurations o CSI-RS resource for channel measurement, o Interference measurement resource for interference measurement, • CSI report configuration: o the type of CSI report, i.e. wideband or subband, Type I or Type II codebook used, etc, Faxer [0080] The UE is also configured with one or more report configurations, which indicate how the CLI measurements are to be reported, Faxer [0084] the base station 502 transmits one or more RRC messages to the wireless device 512 that configure CLI measurement(s) to be performed by the wireless device 512 , Faxer [0108] the UE is instructed to transmit a CLI measurement report based on receiving a DL Control Information (DCI). Note: it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the examined application to have received the CLI configuration as a single control information or multiple separate control information elements as an obvious design choice); and a processor (Faxer [0122] the UE 1400 includes one or more processors 1402 ), coupled to the transceiver ([0108] one or more transceivers 1406), configured to: perform a CLI measurement of a CLI resource identified in the CLI report configuration over one or more CLI measurement occasions identified in the CLI report configuration to provide one or more CLI measurements (Faxer [0084] the RRC message(s) may include a measurement object(s) that configure the CLI measurement(s) to be performed (e.g., configures the time and frequency resources on which the CLI measurements are to be performed by the wireless device 512, ... The wireless device 512 performs a CLI measurement(s) in accordance with the received configuration(s)),identified in the CLI report configuration (Faxer [0084] The wireless device 512 performs a CLI measurement(s) in accordance with the received configuration(s)); and generate a CLI report of the one or more CLI measurements (Faxer [0078] The signal measurements could further be configured to be processed by the UE before reporting it to the NN), identified in the CLI report configuration in accordance with a CLI report type identified in the CLI report configuration ([0108] The UE then either collects a previously measured CLI measurement stored in memory (for instance based on periodic or semi-persistent CLI-IMR) or performs a new CLI measurement based on aperiodic CLI-IMR.); wherein the transceiver is further configured to report the CLI report (Faxer [0084] reports the CLI measurement(s) to the base station 502, e.g., in accordance with associated report configuration(s)) over a Physical Uplink Control Channel (PUCCH) identified in the CLI report configuration (Faxer [0108] The CLI report may then be multiplexed in UCI potentially together with other UCI content such as Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) Acknowledgement (ACK), Scheduling Request (SR), or other CSI reports and transmitted on the PUSCH) . Regarding claim 13, FAXÉR et al. teach the electronic device of claim 11, wherein the processor is further configured to annex the CLI report onto one or more other measurement reports that are outlined by a 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) standard (Faxer [0108] The CLI report may then be multiplexed in UCI potentially together with other UCI content such as Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) Acknowledgement (ACK), Scheduling Request (SR), or other CSI reports and transmitted on the PUSCH), and wherein the transceiver is further configured to report the one or more other measurement reports on the PUCCH (FAXÉR [0108] transmitted on the PUSCH). Regarding claim 16, FAXÉR et al. teach the electronic device of claim 13, wherein the processor is configured to measure a CLI-reference signal received power (CLI-RSRP), a CLI-received signal strength indicator (CLI- RSSI) (Faxer [0104] the UE reports, for each CLI-IMR in the CLI-IMR set, an RSRP or RSSI value), a CLI-reference signal received quality (CLI-RSRQ), or a CLI-signal-to-interference-plus- noise ratio (CLI-SINR) of the CLI resource. Regarding claim 21, FAXÉR et al. teach the method of claim 1, further comprising receiving, by the electronic device, the CLI report configuration that is annexed to a channel state information (CSI) reporting framework such that the CLI report configuration is treated in a manner similar to a CSI report (Faxer [0100] the CLI measurement report is treated as a type of CSI report and the CSI report setting configuration in CSI-ReportConfig is extended to support CLI measurement as an additional type of CSI report). Regarding claim 22, FAXÉR et al. teach The method of claim 1, wherein the generating comprises generating the CLI report together with a channel state information (CSI) report (Faxer [0101] CLI measurement reports are treated as one special case of CSI report ). Regarding claim 23, Faxer et al. teach The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving, by the electronic device, a request for the CLI report via a channel state information (CSI) request bit-field in a Downlink Control Information (DCI) message (Faxer [0033] A-CSI reporting over PUSCH is triggered by a DCI for scheduling PUSCH, i.e. a UL DCI. A special CSI request bit field in the DCI is defined for the purpose. , Faxer [0108] the UE is instructed to transmit a CLI measurement report based on receiving a DL Control Information (DCI), and the CSI request field codepoint in the DCI indicating a trigger state which comprises a CSI report setting that comprises a reportQuantity field indicating an SRS-RSRP or CLI-RSSI report quantity), wherein the generating comprises generating the CLI report subsequent to the received request (Faxer [0108] The CLI report may then be multiplexed in UCI potentially together with other UCI content such as Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) Acknowledgement (ACK), Scheduling Request (SR), or other CSI reports and transmitted on the PUSCH or PUCCH). Regarding claim 24, Faxer et al. teach The electronic device of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to receive the CLI report configuration that is annexed to a channel state information (CSI) reporting framework such that the CLI report configuration is treated in a manner similar to a CSI report (Faxer [0100] the CLI measurement report is treated as a type of CSI report and the CSI report setting configuration in CSI-ReportConfig is extended to support CLI measurement as an additional type of CSI report). Regarding claim 25 , Faxer et al. teach The electronic device of claim 13, wherein the processor is configured to generate the CLI report together with a channel state information (CSI) report (Faxer [0101] CLI measurement reports are treated as one special case of CSI report ). Regarding claim 26, Faxer et al. teach The electronic device of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to: receive a request for the CLI report via a channel state information (CSI) request bit-field in a Downlink Control Information (DCI) message (Faxer [0033] A-CSI reporting over PUSCH is triggered by a DCI for scheduling PUSCH, i.e. a UL DCI. A special CSI request bit field in the DCI is defined for the purpose. , Faxer [0108] the UE is instructed to transmit a CLI measurement report based on receiving a DL Control Information (DCI), and the CSI request field codepoint in the DCI indicating a trigger state which comprises a CSI report setting that comprises a reportQuantity field indicating an SRS-RSRP or CLI-RSSI report quantity),; and generate the CLI report subsequent to the received request (Faxer [0108] The CLI report may then be multiplexed in UCI potentially together with other UCI content such as Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) Acknowledgement (ACK), Scheduling Request (SR), or other CSI reports and transmitted on the PUSCH or PUCCH). Claim 17-20 and 27-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Faxer et al. in view of Zhang et al. (US 20240039679 A1) Regarding claim 17, FAXÉR et al.. teach An electronic device (Faxer UE 1400 in Fig. 14), comprising: a memory (Faxer MEMORY 1404 in Fig. 14) that stores a plurality of instructions (Faxer [0122] the functionality of the UE 1400 described above (e.g., one or more functions of a UE or wireless device 512 as described herein, e.g., with respect to Figures 6-10 and Aspects #1 through #7 above) may be fully or partially implemented in software that is, e.g., stored in the memory 1404 ); and a processor (Faxer processor(s) 1402 in Fig. 14) configured to execute the plurality of instructions stored in the memory, the plurality of instructions, when executed by the processor (Faxer [0123] a computer program including instructions which, when executed by at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to carry out the functionality of the UE 1400), configuring the processor to: recover a CLI report configuration from a downlink (DL) Media Access Control- Control Element (MAC-CE) (Faxer [0090] a configured CLI-IMR with semi-persistent time domain behavior may need to be activated before the UE should perform CLI measurements on the CLI-IMR. Such activation (and deactivation) messages may be transmitted to the UE, e.g., using L2 signaling, such as a MAC CE message) , perform a CLI measurement of a CLI resource identified in the CLI report configuration over one or more CLI measurement occasions identified in the CLI report configuration to provide one or more CLI measurements (Faxer [0084] the RRC message(s) may include a measurement object(s) that configure the CLI measurement(s) to be performed (e.g., configures the time and frequency resources on which the CLI measurements are to be performed by the wireless device 512, ... The wireless device 512 performs a CLI measurement(s) in accordance with the received configuration(s)) identified in the CLI report configuration (Faxer [0084] The wireless device 512 performs a CLI measurement(s) in accordance with the received configuration(s));, and generate a CLI report of the one or more CLI measurements identified in the CLI report configuration in accordance with a CLI report type identified in the CLI report configuration ([0108] The UE then either collects a previously measured CLI measurement stored in memory (for instance based on periodic or semi-persistent CLI-IMR) or performs a new CLI measurement based on aperiodic CLI-IMR.) the CLI report is to be reported on a Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) (Faxer [0108] The CLI report may then be multiplexed in UCI potentially together with other UCI content such as Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) Acknowledgement (ACK), Scheduling Request (SR), or other CSI reports and transmitted on the PUSCH or PUCCH) using an uplink (UL) MAC-CE (Faxer [0083] the transmission is carried out using a Medium Access Control (MAC) Control Element (CE))) to another electronic device within a wireless network (Faxer [0084] reports the CLI measurement(s) to the base station 502). Faxer et al. do not explicitly teach The MAC-CE on a Physical Downlink Shared Channel (PDSCH). Zhang et al. teach the MAC-CE on a Physical Downlink Shared Channel (PDSCH) (Zhang [0180] the configuration circuitry 1542 may receive an RRC message or a MAC-CE including the bit map from a network entity via a PDSCH). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the examined application to have modified Faxer et al et al. by incorporating Zhang receiving the MAC-CE on the PDSCH to arrive at the invention The motivation of doing so would have received the configuration by the UE. Regarding claim 18, the combination of FAXÉR et al. and Huang et al. teaches the electronic device of claim 17, wherein the electronic device comprises a user equipment (UE) (Faxer [0072] configuring a UE (e.g., the wireless device 512) to report CLI measurement(s)), and wherein the other electronic device comprises a base station (BS) (Faxer [0084] reports the CLI measurement(s) to the base station 502). Regarding claim 19, the combination of FAXÉR et al. and Huang et al. teaches the electronic device of claim 17, wherein the plurality of instructions, when executed by the processor, further configure the processor to annex the CLI report onto one or more other measurement reports that are outlined by a 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) standard (Faxer [0108] The CLI report may then be multiplexed in UCI potentially together with other UCI content such as Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) Acknowledgement (ACK), Scheduling Request (SR), or other CSI reports and transmitted on the PUSCH),. Regarding claim 20, the combination of FAXÉR et al. and Huang et al. teaches the electronic device of claim 17, wherein the one or more other measurement reports comprise a Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) report (Faxer [0108] The CLI report may then be multiplexed in UCI potentially together with other UCI content such as Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) Acknowledgement (ACK), Scheduling Request (SR), or other CSI reports and transmitted on the PUSCH).. Regarding claim 27, the combination of FAXÉR et al. and Huang et al. teaches The electronic device of claim 17, wherein , wherein the plurality of instructions, when executed by the processor, configure the processor to receive the CLI report configuration that is annexed to a channel state information (CSI) reporting framework such that the CLI report configuration is treated in a manner similar to a CSI report (Faxer [0100] the CLI measurement report is treated as a type of CSI report and the CSI report setting configuration in CSI-ReportConfig is extended to support CLI measurement as an additional type of CSI report). Regarding claim 28, the combination of FAXÉR et al. and Huang et al. teaches The electronic device of claim 17, wherein , wherein the plurality of instructions, when executed by the processor, configure the processor to generate the CLI report together with a channel state information (CSI) report (Faxer [0101] CLI measurement reports are treated as one special case of CSI report ). Regarding claim 29, the combination of FAXÉR et al. and Huang et al. teaches The electronic device of claim 17, wherein the plurality of instructions, when executed by the processor, further configure the processor to: receive a request for the CLI report via a channel state information (CSI) request bit-field in a Downlink Control Information (DCI) message(Faxer [0033] A-CSI reporting over PUSCH is triggered by a DCI for scheduling PUSCH, i.e. a UL DCI. A special CSI request bit field in the DCI is defined for the purpose. , Faxer [0108] the UE is instructed to transmit a CLI measurement report based on receiving a DL Control Information (DCI), and the CSI request field codepoint in the DCI indicating a trigger state which comprises a CSI report setting that comprises a reportQuantity field indicating an SRS-RSRP or CLI-RSSI report quantity),; and generate the CLI report subsequent to the received request (Faxer [0108] The CLI report may then be multiplexed in UCI potentially together with other UCI content such as Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) Acknowledgement (ACK), Scheduling Request (SR), or other CSI reports and transmitted on the PUSCH or PUCCH). . Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAID M ELNOUBI whose telephone number is (571)272-9732. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:30AM to 6:00PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kathy Wang-Hurst can be reached at 571-270-5371. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAID M ELNOUBI/Examiner, Art Unit 2644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 23, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 11, 2026
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 23, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12581401
PC5 BROADCAST MESSAGES WITH SELECTED SYSTEM INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581328
REQUESTING AN UNSCHEDULED RADIO RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (RRM) OPERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12568465
PAGING FOR UNLICENSED NEW RADIO
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562469
VERTICALLY STACKED, INTEGRATABLE, MULTIPURPOSE PLATFORM CONFIGURABLE AS WIRELESS BASE STATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556252
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR EXTREMELY HIGH THROUGHPUT NULL DATA PACKET SUPPORT USING RANGING NULL DATA PACKET ANNOUNCEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+22.3%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 408 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month