Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/227,832

Dataflow Pipeline Deployment System and Method

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 28, 2023
Priority
Jul 28, 2022 — provisional 63/369,664
Examiner
WEI, ZENGPU
Art Unit
2197
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Constant Contact Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
230 granted / 324 resolved
+16.0% vs TC avg
Strong +54% interview lift
Without
With
+53.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
355
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§103
89.5%
+49.5% vs TC avg
§102
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 324 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to communication filed on 1/27/2026. The instant application having application No. 18/227,832 filed on July 28, 2023, claims priority to the provisional application having application No. 63/369,664 filed on July 28, 2022. Status of the Claims Claims 1, 6, and 7 are amended, claims 8-13 are added, claims 1-13 are currently pending in the application. Response to Amendment Regarding art rejection: The amended claims overcome current art rejections which are withdrawn. Examiner Notes Examiner cites particular columns, paragraphs, figures and line numbers in the references as applied to the claims below for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested that, in preparing responses, the applicant fully consider the references in their entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the examiner. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term "immediate future" in claim 1 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term " immediate future" is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claims 6 and 7 have the same issue as claim 1. Claims 2-5 and 8-13 are rejected for the same reason because they depend from their respective independent claims 1, 6, or 7. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. For example, Sriram et al., US 9195455 B2, teaches Reducing Downtime When Patching Multiple Inter-dependent Software Components. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN DAVID BERMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7206. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F, 9-6 Eastern. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bradley Teets, can be reached on 571-272-3338. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZENGPU WEI/Examiner, Art Unit 2197
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 28, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 10, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 27, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12639064
TRANSLATING BETWEEN VERSIONS OF DATA OBJECT SCHEMAS FOR DATA PRODUCERS AND DATA CONSUMERS
4y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632229
CREATION AND AUTOMATIC UPDATING OF A SOFTWARE APPLICATION
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12619409
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EAGER SOFTWARE BUILD
7y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12619419
USER EQUIPMENT, SOFTWARE UPDATE SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12596548
Multiprocessor Programming Toolkit for Design Reuse
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+53.7%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 324 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month