Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/229,093

COMPUTING OBJECT HAVING MACHINE LEARNING VALUE GENERATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 01, 2023
Examiner
IDOWU, OLUGBENGA O
Art Unit
2494
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
SAP SE
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
467 granted / 653 resolved
+13.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
681
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
66.5%
+26.5% vs TC avg
§102
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
§112
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 653 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 – 11 and 21 – 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mukherjee (Muk), publication number: US 2022/0319646 in view of Mehta, publication number: US 2026/0127245. As per claim 1, Muk teaches a computing system comprising: memory; one or more processing units coupled to the memory; and one or more computer readable storage media storing instructions that, when executed, cause the computing system to perform operations comprising: receiving first user input to obtain a putative value for a first attribute (diagnosis and problem encountered, [0038], figure 1, 118, [0068]); determining a first value generation method specified for the first attribute, the first value generation method being a first member function of a computing object, the computing data object comprising (1) a defined set of a plurality of variables, wherein the first user input specifies a first value for at least a first variable of the plurality of variables (generating assessment based on description, [0055], 126, Fig. 1); generating at least one result value for the first value using the trained machine learning model (presenting top suggestions, [0055], Fig 1,); and returning the at least one result value in response to the first user input (allowing selection by clinician, Fig. 1, 128, [0055]). Muk does not teach (2) a second value generation method, being a second member function of the computing object that is different than the first value generation method, programmed to generate a value for a variable of the plurality of variables other than the at least a first variable; retrieving a second value for at least a second variable of the plurality of variables of the computing object; providing the second value to a trained machine learning model specified for the first value generation method of the computing object; In an analogous art, Mehta teaches (2) a second value generation method, being a second member function of the computing object that is different than the first value generation method, programmed to generate a value for a variable of the plurality of variables other than the at least a first variable; retrieving a second value for at least a second variable of the plurality of variables of the computing object; providing the second value to a trained machine learning model specified for the first value generation method of the computing object (machine learning model for generating suggestions for automated form entry, updating the machine learning model based on selection of a suggestion, ranking suggestions, [0055][0057]); Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Muk to include secondary input suggestions as described in Mehta’s automated system for the advantage of further improving the suggestion system. As per claim 2, the combination teaches the operations further comprising: training the machine learning model using values for a plurality of instances of the computing object (Muk: Machine learning engine 102, [0026]). As per claim 3, the combination teaches the operations further comprising: defining a training data view, the training data view specifying variables of the plurality of instances of the computing object to be used in the training the machine learning model, the training data view referencing relational data (Muk: vectors 110 and 112, [0032]). As per claim 4, the combination teaches the operations further comprising: receiving user input accepting or rejecting the at least one result value (Muk: accept or reject, [0056-0057]). As per claim 5, the combination teaches the operations further comprising: generating one or more confidence measures for the at least one result value (Muk: retrieve text based on score, [0055]). As per claim 6, the combination teaches wherein one or more confidence measures comprise an accuracy of the at least one result value (Muk: accurate text blocks, [0022][0024]). As per claim 7, the combination teaches wherein generating at least one result value comprises generating a plurality of result values and returning the at least one result value in response to the first use input comprises returning multiple result values of the plurality of result values (Muk: list, [0055]). As per claim 8, the combination teaches the operations further comprising: ranking the multiple result values (Muk: retrieved based on score, [0054-0055], Mehta: ranking, [0055]). As per claim 9, the combination teaches the operations further comprising: receiving second user input, wherein the second user input comprises the second value (Mehta: form completion, [0055][0057]). As per claim 10, the combination teaches the operations further comprising: storing a definition of an input value retrieval scenario, the input value retrieval scenario specifying: an identifier of a machine learning algorithm for the trained machine learning model; and data to be retrieved from a plurality of instances of the computing object (Mehta: multiple machine learning models, [0055]). As per claim 11, the combination teaches wherein the first user input is received through a first user interface control of a graphical user interface comprising a plurality of user interface controls, the plurality of user interface controls comprising the first user interface control, the operations further comprising: generating a data artefact associating multiple user interface controls of the plurality of user interface controls with respective methods for obtaining a putative value for a given user interface control of the plurality of user interface controls (Mehta: different machine learning models corresponding to different input fields, [0055]). Claims 21 – 27 are rejected based on claims 1-3, 7-8 and 10-11 Clams 28 – 29 are rejected based on claims 1 - 2 Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLUGBENGA O IDOWU whose telephone number is (571)270-1450. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jung Kim can be reached at 5712723804. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OLUGBENGA O IDOWU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2494
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 01, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12670410
PRIVACY ENHANCED FEDERATED TRAINING AND INFERENCE OVER VERTICALLY AND HORIZONTALLY PARTITIONED DATA
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665777
BLOCKCHAIN-BASED DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, MEDIUM, AND PRODUCT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659166
BIOSECURITY CONTROL SYSTEM BASED ON BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY FOR REGULATION AND MONITORING THE PRINTING OF GENETIC SEQUENCES
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652181
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, CONTENT MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR MANAGING CONTENT DATA USING BLOCKCHAIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12634145
CRYPTOGRAPHIC TRUST SYSTEM FOR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS INTEGRITY USING TUPLE SPACES AND MESSAGING USER AGENTS
2y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+19.0%)
3y 3m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 653 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month