Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/230,274

ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY TOY PROJECTILES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 04, 2023
Examiner
WEISS, NICHOLAS J
Art Unit
3711
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
265 granted / 440 resolved
-9.8% vs TC avg
Strong +42% interview lift
Without
With
+42.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
483
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
44.3%
+4.3% vs TC avg
§102
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
§112
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 440 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 21-26, 28-30, & 40-42 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cox 8,683,742 (of record) in view of Scarabino 2007/0193914. Cox shows a seeding system, which includes seeds 12, 22 within a growing medium 14, 20 such as soil, contained within a capsule outer layer 16. The growing medium may be compressed, and the outer layer applied as a biodegradable coating (column 3, line 63 to column 4, line 8). The assembly is described as a "pellet", but it is not clear if it may be spherical. A spherical assembly may be easier to handle and distribute. For example, Scarabino discloses that an encapsulated seed may be spherical, to be propelled by a gun. This spherical shape would be an obvious modification of the seed assembly of Cox. With regard to claims 22-25, Scarabino notes that the projectile can be of various sizes (paragraph 0061); the diameter would be an obvious adjustment for the environment. With regard to claim 26, the pellet of Cox may include different materials 12, 22. Claim(s) 31-38, 43, & 44 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cox in view of Scarabino as applied to claims 21-26, 28-30, & 42 above, and further in view of Corak et al 2010/0263274. It is not clear if the seed assembly of Cox includes foam. Corak discloses a system that improves handling, distribution, planting, and cultivating of seeds (paragraph 0005), in which the seeds may be encapsulated in biodegradable foam with binders (paragraph 0032). The capsule may include a uniform material or layers of different material (paragraph 0037). This foam and binders would be an obvious addition to the seed assembly of Cox. With regard to claim 40, the package size would be an obvious adjustment for transport. Claim(s) 39 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cox in view of Scarabino and Corak et al as applied to claim 38 above, and further in view of Olson 5,353,712. Scarabino suggests that the projectile of Cox may be spherical, but it is not clear if the surface includes a texture. Olsen discloses that a spherical projectile may include a pattern of dimples, which helps the projectile fly further and more accurate (column 4, lines 20-31). These dimples would be an obvious addition to the projectile of Cox and Scarabino. Applicant’s arguments filed 9/17/2025 with respect to the rejection(s) of the claim(s) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Cox. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN A RICCI whose telephone number is (571)272-4429. The examiner can normally be reached Mon to Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas Weiss, can be reached at 571-270-1775. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN A RICCI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 04, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 17, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12485201
Adhesive For An Absorbent Article
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Patent 12465530
ELASTIC MEMBER AND DISPOSABLE WEARING ARTICLE INCLUDING ELASTIC MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Patent 12447041
A COLLECTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Patent 11389573
Ear Water Suction Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 19, 2022
Patent 10799060
BREW BASKET FOR AUTOMATED BEVERAGE BREWING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2020
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+42.5%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 440 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month