Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/232,765

ACCELERATED MEMORY TRAINING THROUGH IN-BAND CONFIGURATION REGISTER UPDATE MODE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Aug 10, 2023
Examiner
FRANKLIN, RICHARD B
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
543 granted / 651 resolved
+23.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
665
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 651 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1 – 6, 12 – 16, and 20 – 32 are pending. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 25 and 28 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 12,555,646. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of the patent require all the limitations of the claims of the instant application. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 – 6, 12 – 16, and 20 – 24 are allowable. Claims 25 – 32 would be allowable if rewritten, amended, or a proper terminal disclaimer is filed to overcome the non-statutory double patenting rejection(s) of claims 25 and 28 set forth in this office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claims 1 – 6, 23, and 24 are allowable because the prior art of record fails to teach or suggest alone or in combination the hardware interface to receive a first assertion and a second assertion of a chip select signal through the chip select input to trigger entry into a configuration register update mode; a decision feedback equalization (DFE) configuration register to store a first configuration setting for the hardware interface to the CA bus; and a second configuration register for a configuration setting other than DFE, the second configuration register to store a second configuration setting for the hardware interface to the CA bus; wherein the apparatus is to update the second configuration register with in-band register writes in the configuration register update mode, as required by independent claim 1, in combination with the other claimed limitations (emphasis added). US Patent Application Publication No. 2022/0300197 (hereinafter Sethuramin) teaches a memory device including registers which provide settings for operation of the memory device (Sethuramin; Paragraph [0031]) that includes storing training feedback (Sethuramin; Paragraphs [0042], [0052], and [0067]), but does not teach using specific in-band register writes to update a second configuration register other than the DFE configuration register, as required by independent claim 1. US Patent No. 11,675,728 (hereinafter Leslie) teaches a memory device including receiving and updating multiple configuration data through a command and address bus, including DFE parameters (Leslie; Col 2 Lines 1 – 11), but does not teach doing so utilizing in-band register writes in a configuration register update mode, as required by independent claim 1. US Patent No. 11,675,716 (hereinafter Mozak) teaches a memory device which receives a signal through a command/address bus to trigger entry into a configuration mode (Mozak; Abstract), but does not teach performing an update to a second configuration register with in-band register writes in the configuration register update mode, as required by independent claim 1. Claims 2 – 6, 23, and 24 are also allowable because of their dependence, either directly or indirectly, upon allowable independent claim 1. Claims 12 – 16 and 20 – 22 are allowable because the prior art of record fails to teach or suggest alone or in combination the memory chip to receive from the memory controller a first assertion and a second assertion of a chip select signal through the chip select input to trigger the memory chip to enter a configuration register update mode, the memory chip including: a decision feedback equalization (DFE) configuration register to store a first configuration setting for the CA bus interface; and a second configuration register for a configuration setting other than DFE, the second configuration register to store a second configuration setting for the CA bus interface; and wherein the memory chip is to update the second configuration register with in- band register writes in the configuration register update mode, as required by independent claim 12, in combination with the other claimed limitations (emphasis added). US Patent Application Publication No. 2022/0300197 (hereinafter Sethuramin) teaches a memory device including registers which provide settings for operation of the memory device (Sethuramin; Paragraph [0031]) that includes storing training feedback (Sethuramin; Paragraphs [0042], [0052], and [0067]), but does not teach using specific in-band register writes to update a second configuration register other than the DFE configuration register, as required by independent claim 12. US Patent No. 11,675,728 (hereinafter Leslie) teaches a memory device including receiving and updating multiple configuration data through a command and address bus, including DFE parameters (Leslie; Col 2 Lines 1 – 11), but does not teach doing so utilizing in-band register writes in a configuration register update mode, as required by independent claim 12. US Patent No. 11,675,716 (hereinafter Mozak) teaches a memory device which receives a signal through a command/address bus to trigger entry into a configuration mode (Mozak; Abstract), but does not teach performing an update to a second configuration register with in-band register writes in the configuration register update mode, as required by independent claim 12. Claims 13 – 16 and 20 – 22 are also allowable because of their dependence, either directly or indirectly, upon allowable independent claim 12. Claims 25 – 32 would be allowable if rewritten, amended, or a proper terminal disclaimer is filed to overcome the non-statutory double patenting rejection(s) of claims 25 and 28 set forth in this office action because the prior art of record fails to teach or suggest alone or in combination the hardware interface to receive a configuration register update mode command to trigger entry into a configuration register update mode; a decision feedback equalization (DFE) configuration register to store a first configuration setting for the hardware interface to the CA bus; and a second configuration register for a configuration setting other than DFE, the second configuration register to store a second configuration setting for the hardware interface to the CA bus; wherein the apparatus is to update the second configuration register with in-band register writes in the configuration register update mode, as required by independent claim 25, in combination with the other claimed limitations (emphasis added). US Patent Application Publication No. 2022/0300197 (hereinafter Sethuramin) teaches a memory device including registers which provide settings for operation of the memory device (Sethuramin; Paragraph [0031]) that includes storing training feedback (Sethuramin; Paragraphs [0042], [0052], and [0067]), but does not teach using specific in-band register writes to update a second configuration register other than the DFE configuration register, as required by independent claim 25. US Patent No. 11,675,728 (hereinafter Leslie) teaches a memory device including receiving and updating multiple configuration data through a command and address bus, including DFE parameters (Leslie; Col 2 Lines 1 – 11), but does not teach doing so utilizing in-band register writes in a configuration register update mode, as required by independent claim 25. US Patent No. 11,675,716 (hereinafter Mozak) teaches a memory device which receives a signal through a command/address bus to trigger entry into a configuration mode (Mozak; Abstract), but does not teach performing an update to a second configuration register with in-band register writes in the configuration register update mode, as required by independent claim 25. Claims 26 – 32 would also be allowable because of their dependence, either directly or indirectly, upon allowable independent claim 25. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICHARD B FRANKLIN whose telephone number is (571)272-0669. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Idriss Alrobaye can be reached at (571) 270-1023. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RICHARD B FRANKLIN/ Examiner, Art Unit 2181
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 10, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
May 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748553
System and Method for searching a buffer of a non-volatile storage Host Controller
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743741
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXPLOITING QUEUES AND TRANSITIONAL STORAGE FOR IMPROVED LOW-LATENCY HIGH-BANDWIDTH ON-DIE DATA RETRIEVAL
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12718851
DOMAIN SPECIFIC MEMORY MANAGEMENT
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12710869
DUAL-PORT USB FLASH DRIVE FOR ON-THE-GO (OTG) SUPPORTED DEVICES
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12705179
MEMORY MODULE, MEMORY SYSTEM INCLUDING MEMORY MODULE, AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+0.6%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 651 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month