Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/233,150

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTING GAINS FOR POSITION CONTROL OF A HEADER OF AN AGRICULTURAL HARVESTER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 11, 2023
Examiner
HUYNH, LUAT T
Art Unit
3667
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Cnh Industrial America LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allow Rate
556 granted / 597 resolved
+41.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
606
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
§103
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 597 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 have been examined. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 08/11/2023 and 03/21/2025 have been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-16 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Vandike et al. (US 2022/0110262 A1) (Vandike hereinafter). Regarding claim 1, Vandike discloses a system for adjusting gains for position control of a header of an agricultural harvester (Fig. 1, agricultural harvester 100), the system comprising: a header of an agricultural harvester (Fig. 1, header 102); an actuator configured to adjust a position of the header relative to a field (Fig. 1, actuator 107); a computing system communicatively coupled to the actuator (Fig. 2, processors/servers 201), the computing system being configured to: receive data indicative of a contour of the field forward of the agricultural harvester relative to a forward direction of travel of the agricultural harvester ([0062], in-situ sensors 208 include on-board sensors 222 that are mounted on-board agricultural harvester 100. Such sensors may include a perception sensor (e.g., a forward looking mono or stereo camera system and image processing system), image sensors that are internal to agricultural harvester 100 (such as the clean grain camera or cameras mounted to identify material that is exiting agricultural harvester 100 through the residue subsystem or from the cleaning subsystem). The in-situ sensors 208 also include remote in-situ sensors 224 that capture in-situ information. In-situ data include data taken from a sensor on-board the harvester or taken by any sensor where the data are detected during the harvesting operation; [0093], operator 260 can also edit the predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 or both. The edits can change a value on the predictive map 264, change a size, shape, position, or existence of a control zone one predictive control zone map 265, or both); determine an aggressiveness of the contour of the field based at least in part on the data indicative of the contour of the field; and adjust a gain for controlling the actuator based at least in part on the aggressiveness of the contour of the field ([0139]) and ([0210] – [0211]). Regarding claims 2-3, Vandike discloses the system of claim 1, as stated above, wherein the computing system is further configured to compare the aggressiveness of the contour of the field to at least one threshold, each of the at least one threshold being associated with a respective gain setting, wherein the computing system is configured to adjust the gain for controlling the actuator by adjusting the gain to the gain setting associated with the aggressiveness of the contour of the field; and wherein the computing system is configured to adjust the gain for controlling the actuator to the gain setting associated with the aggressiveness of the contour of the field when the gain setting is within a gain range of the actuator ([0091]). Regarding claim 4, Vandike discloses the system of claim 1, as stated above, wherein the computing system is configured to determine the aggressiveness of the contour of the field based at least in part on a derivative of a slope of the contour of the field ([0115] – [0116]). Regarding claim 5, Vandike discloses the system of claim 1, as stated above, wherein the computing system is further configured to filter the data indicative of the contour of the field based at least in part on actuation of the header by the actuator, wherein the computing system is configured to determine the aggressiveness of the contour of the field based at least in part on the data after being filtered ([0157]). Regarding claim 6, Vandike discloses the system of claim 1, as stated above, wherein the computing system is configured to determine the aggressiveness of the contour of the field based at least in part on the data indicative of the contour of the field and a current heading of the forward direction of travel of the agricultural harvester relative to the contour of the field ([0085]). Regarding claim 7, Vandike discloses the system of claim 1, as stated above, wherein the computing system is configured to move the header relative to a chassis of the agricultural harvester to adjust the position of the header relative to the field ([0037]). Regarding claim 8, Vandike discloses the system of claim 1, as stated above, further comprising a sensor positioned on the agricultural harvester, the sensor having a field of view directed towards the field forward of the agricultural harvester, the sensor being configured to generate the data indicative of the contour of the field, wherein the computing system is configured to receive the data indicative of the contour of the field generated by the sensor ([0062]). Regarding claim 9, Vandike discloses the system of claim 8, as stated above, wherein the sensor comprises at least one of a radar sensor, a LIDAR device, a camera, or an ultrasonic sensor ([0051]). Regarding claim 10, Vandike discloses the system of claim 1, as stated above, wherein the data indicative of the contour of the field is historical data generated before a current harvesting operation of the agricultural harvester within the field ([0058]). Regarding claims 11-16, 18 and 20, the elements contained in claims 11-16, 18 and 20 are substantially similar to elements presented in claims 1-6, 8 and 10, respectively, except that it set forth the claimed invention as a method rather than a system and are rejected for the same reasons as applied above. Regarding claim 19, Vandike discloses the method of claim 18, as stated above, wherein receiving the data generated by the sensor comprises receiving the data generated by the sensor when a ground speed of the agricultural harvester is less than a threshold speed ([0048]). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 17 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. See attached form PTO-892. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Luke Huynh whose telephone number is 571-270-5746. The examiner can normally be reached Mon 8-5, Tues 8-12, Thurs & Fri 8-2. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hitesh Patel can be reached at 571-270-5442. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUKE HUYNH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3667 01/20/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 11, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602042
RADIO CONTROLLED AIRCRAFT, REMOTE CONTROLLER AND METHODS FOR USE THEREWITH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596386
OPTICAL FIBER SENSING SYSTEM, OPTICAL FIBER SENSING EQUIPMENT, AND UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ALLOCATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597349
VEHICLE-EXIT ASSIST APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583516
PAVING MACHINE WITH SMART STEERING CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576875
VEHICLE MANEUVER ESTIMATION ACCURACY CONVEYANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+8.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 597 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month