Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/234,813

ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY AND RECHARGEABLE BATTERY INCLUDING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Aug 16, 2023
Priority
Sep 13, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0115098
Examiner
YOON, KEVIN E
Art Unit
1735
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
402 granted / 676 resolved
-5.5% vs TC avg
Strong +43% interview lift
Without
With
+43.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
712
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
54.0%
+14.0% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 676 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Otani (WO 2022/168623 A1, cited by applicant, see US 2023/0335805 A1 for English translation). Re Claim 1. Otani teaches an electrode assembly (Fig. 1-6 & 17, item 20) comprising: a first electrode (item 22) having a first coated portion (a portion covered by items 22B & 22D) and a first uncoated portion (item 221) at an edge of the first coated portion; a second electrode (item 21) having a second coated portion (a portion covered by items 21B and 101) and a second uncoated portion (item 21C) at an edge of the second coated portion; a separator (item 23) between the first electrode and the second electrode; a first insulating layer (item 22Db) on a first surface of the first uncoated portion; and a second insulating layer (item 22Da) on a second surface of the first uncoated portion, wherein lengths of the first insulating layer and the second insulating layer are different from each other (Fig. 17), wherein the first uncoated portion is bent toward a center of the electrode assembly and has a portion overlapping and electrically connected to an adjacent first uncoated portion (Fig. 17), wherein the second insulating layer (item 22Da) extends onto the bent portion of the first uncoated portion (Fig. 17), and wherein a distal end of the second insulating layer on the bent portion of the first uncoated portion is spaced apart from the adjacent first uncoated portion (Fig. 17). Re Claim 2. Otani teaches wherein the second surface of the first uncoated portion faces an end portion of the second electrode and is spaced apart from the end portion of the second electrode (Fig. 17). Re Claim 3. Otani teaches wherein the first uncoated portion has a first region extending from the first coated portion and a second region bent from the first region, wherein the second region has a portion overlapping the adjacent first uncoated portion, wherein the first insulating layer is on the first region, and wherein the second insulating layer is on the second region (Fig. 17). Re Claim 4. Otani teaches wherein the second insulating layer is on a part of the second region, wherein the second region has an exposed surface at where the second surface of the first uncoated portion is exposed, and wherein the exposed surface of the second region contacts one surface of the adjacent first uncoated portion (Fig. 17). Re Claim 5. Otani teaches wherein the second insulating layer is on the first region (Fig. 17). Re Claim 6. Otani teaches wherein the first electrode is a negative electrode, and the second electrode is a positive electrode (Fig. 17), which is switched from the claimed configuration. However, Otani discloses that the positive electrode can be bent the same way as the negative electrode (para. 64). Re Claim 7. Otani teaches a rechargeable battery (abstract, Fig. 1) comprising: an electrode assembly (Fig. 1-6 & 17, item 20) comprising: a first electrode (item 22) having a first coated portion (a portion covered by items 22B & 22D) and a first uncoated portion (item 221) at an edge of the first coated portion; a second electrode (item 21) having a second coated portion (a portion covered by items 21B and 101) and a second uncoated portion (item 21C) at an edge of the second coated portion; a separator (item 23) between the first electrode and the second electrode; a first insulating layer (item 22Db) on a first surface of the first uncoated portion; and a second insulating layer (item 22Da) on a second surface of the first uncoated portion, wherein lengths of the first insulating layer and the second insulating layer are different from each other (Fig. 17), a cylindrical case (item 11) accommodating the electrode assembly; a center pin (para. 67) at a center of the electrode assembly; and an electrolyte (para. 77) within the cylindrical case, wherein the first uncoated portion is bent toward a center of the electrode assembly and has a portion overlapping and electrically connected to an adjacent first uncoated portion (Fig. 17), wherein the second insulating layer (item 22Da) extends onto the bent portion of the first uncoated portion (Fig. 17), and wherein a distal end of the second insulating layer on the bent portion of the first uncoated portion is spaced apart from the adjacent first uncoated portion (Fig. 17). Re Claims 8-12. See rejections of Claims 2-6. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 and 7 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Newly applied reference, Otani addresses the new limitations. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. The rejections above rely on the references for all the teachings expressed in the text of the references and/or one of ordinary skill in the art would have reasonably understood from the texts. Only specific portions of the texts have been pointed out to emphasize certain aspects of the prior art, however, each reference as a whole should be reviewed in responding to the rejection, since other sections of the same reference and/or various combinations of the cited references may be relied on in future rejections in view of amendments. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEVIN E YOON whose telephone number is (571)270-5932. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9 AM- 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Keith Walker can be reached at 571-272-3458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEVIN E YOON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1735 6/11/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 16, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 08, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12695155
BATTERY CELL VENT EXHAUST MANIFOLD SYSTEM FOR THERMAL RUNAWAY MITIGATION
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689101
SECONDARY BATTERY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12678854
SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING SET TEMPERATURE OF MOLTEN METAL
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668040
PACKAGING MATERIAL FOR POWER STORAGE DEVICE, METHOD OF PRODUCING SAME, AND POWER STORAGE DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671104
BATTERY PACK FOR A VEHICLE AND METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MAKING THE SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+43.1%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 676 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month