Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/235,010

ADAPTIVE DETECTION AND DIFFUSION OF CARBON DIOXIDE USING DRONES

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Aug 17, 2023
Examiner
NIMOX, RAYMOND LONDALE
Art Unit
2857
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
344 granted / 490 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
549
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§103
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 490 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim(s) 11-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because the claim(s) are directed towards “A computer program product comprising one or more computer readable storage media, and program instructions collectively stored on the one or more computer readable storage media”. The claim(s) should be amended to read ‘A non-transitory computer readable media having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: …’. Allowable Subject Matter (over prior art) Claim(s) 1-10, 17-20 is/are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter over prior art: Examiner’s closest prior art to the claimed subject matter: RAJU (US 20230408477 A1) teaches ‘a system comprising a sensor module configured to detect and measure one or more air pollutants at a geographic location and generate air quality data, a cloud based application comprising a data processing module configured to receive, via a communication module, the air quality data and derive a first air quality index, a user device comprising an application program configured to receive, via the communication module, the first air quality index, the application program configured to suggest an alternate location having a second air quality index, and wherein the air quality data comprises one or more air quality parameters, the geographic location data corresponding to the one or more air quality parameters, and a time stamp; and wherein the system is configured to provide real-time air quality of the geographic location and the alternate location’; ZENG ET AL. (US 20180156766 A1) teaches ‘A system and method for monitoring environment employ a dense network of low-cost sensor nodes. The method includes obtaining environmental information by combining a plurality of observations; wherein the plurality of observations are made with in-situ or remote sensors; wherein the sensors are of different degrees of accuracy in a way to complement each other, and of different cost, and wherein the low-cost sensors form a high-density network comprising a plurality of distributed sensors. The system can monitor gas concentrations over urban areas, industrial, forest, farm, wetland, power plants and other types of surfaces’; COGILL ET AL. (US 20160290977 A1) teaches ‘A method for localizing the source of air pollution that includes receiving pollution data from a network in communication with at least one air pollution sensor that is connected to at least one motor vehicle in a stationary position. Each stationary motor vehicle of the network is positioned at a different air pollution measurement location. The method may further include determining from the pollution data an origin of an air pollutant using an air pollution model provided by a pollutant source localization device including at least one hardware processor’. None of the cited prior art alone or in combination provides motivation to explicitly teach: sending a first drone into an area, the first drone comprising a carbon dioxide sensor; detecting a level of carbon dioxide in the area; generating a map wherein the map includes a position and the level of carbon dioxide; calculating a carbon dioxide hotspot where the level of carbon dioxide is above a threshold; creating a plan, using a planner module, to diffuse the carbon dioxide hotspot in a time limit wherein creating the plan comprises calculating an amount of a drones to send based on a needed amount of humidity and a needed amount of light to diffuse the carbon dioxide hotspot in the time limit, wherein the needed amount of humidity and the needed amount of light is calculated using an optimizer module, wherein the time limit is provided by a work order; sending the calculated amount of drones to the area of the carbon dioxide hotspot; diffusing the carbon dioxide hotspot, using the calculated amount of drones; sampling the area, using the first drone, and updating the map with a new level of carbon dioxide of claim(s) 1, 11, 17 (including dependent claim(s)). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND NIMOX whose telephone number is (469)295-9226. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu 10am-8pm CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ANDREW SCHECHTER can be reached at (571) 272-2302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. RAYMOND NIMOX Primary Examiner Art Unit 2857 /RAYMOND L NIMOX/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2857
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 17, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12762035
SYNTHETIC DATA GENERATION UTILIZING GENERATIVE ARTIFICAL INTELLIGENCE AND SCALABLE DATA GENERATION TOOLS
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12754243
METHOD AND APPARATUS WITH BATTERY PARAMETERS DETERMINATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12748159
BATTERY PROCESSING SYSTEM AND BATTERY PROCESSING METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742900
ROBUST LOW FREQUENCY SEISMIC BANDWIDTH EXTENSION VIA A DEEP NEURAL NETWORK TRAINED ON SYNTHETIC SEISMIC DATA
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742768
IN SITU CONCENTRATION OF HYDROCARBONS IN ROCK
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+10.4%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 490 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month