Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/235,335

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REMODELING AN EAR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 17, 2023
Examiner
DANG, ANH TIEU
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Eargear LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
412 granted / 633 resolved
-4.9% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+35.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
679
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 633 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on January2, 2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed December 2, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive in view of the annotated images below further clarifying the examiner’s position. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 41-61 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Weinstein (WO 2022/040218). Regarding claim 41, Weinstein discloses a correcting apparatus for remodeling a portion of an external ear (abstract), the apparatus comprising: a correcting component (Corrective component 200, Fig. 4A) having a main body (main body 204, Fig. 4A) shaped for insertion into, or in contact with, a conchal bowl of the ear (main body 202 may be placed at least partially in contact with the conchal bowl of ear), first and second projections (206, 204) extending anteriorly from the main body and a tab (214) extending outwardly from an upper edge portion of the main body to assist in placement of the correcting component; wherein the first projection is configured for positioning near, or in contact with, at least a portion of a cymba of the ear; and wherein the second projection is configured to extend into a cavum of the conchal bowl (figure 4C, functional limitations are not given full patentable weight, as long as the prior art meets the structural limitations in the claim and is capable of performing the recited functions, the prior art meets the claims. The device of Weinstein could be placed in an arbitrary ear shape in which the second projection would contact the cavum of the conchal bowl). PNG media_image1.png 330 644 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 393 576 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 42, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 41, further comprising a third projection (see image above). Regarding claim 43, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 41, wherein the main body comprises a material sufficiently rigid to remain in position during a time period of use sufficient to correct a deformity in the external ear (figure 4C, functional limitations are not given full patentable weight, as long as the prior art meets the structural limitations in the claim and is capable of performing the recited functions, the prior art meets the claims). Regarding claim 44, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 41, wherein the main body comprises a first surface, a second opposing surface and a hole (214) extending through the first and second surfaces for passing sound waves through the main body (figure 4D). Regarding claim 45, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 41, further comprising an attachment component (100, 140) configured for securing the correcting component against the surface of the external ear (figures 8B, 8C, functional limitations are not given full patentable weight, as long as the prior art meets the structural limitations in the claim and is capable of performing the recited functions, the prior art meets the claims). Regarding claim 46, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 45, wherein the attachment component comprises a slot (tab 214 can be placed into any of the slots of 140 shown below) for receiving the extended tab therethrough. PNG media_image3.png 209 256 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 47, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 46, wherein the slot has a shape and size matching the extended tab of the main body (figures 8B, 8C). Regarding claim 48, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 45, wherein the attachment component (100) has an opening to allow sound waves to pass therethrough (spaces between tabs 144). Regarding claim 49, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 45, wherein the attachment component comprises an adhesive (paragraph 0078). Regarding claim 50, Weinstein discloses a system for remodeling a portion of an external ear, the system comprising: a first correcting component (200) having a main body shaped for insertion into, or in contact with, a conchal bowl of the ear and first and second projections extending anteriorly from the main body (see image above), and a tab (see image above) extending outwardly from an upper edge portion of the main body (see image above) to assist in placement of the correcting component, the first projection being configured for positioning near, or in contact with, at least a portion of a cymba of the ear (figure 7B), and the second projection being configured to extend into a cavum of the conchal bowl (figure 7B, 22); and a second correcting component (100) having a main body configured for positioning between a surface of the external ear and a helix of the external ear (figure 8B). Regarding claim 51, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 50, wherein the first correcting component (200) further comprises a third projection (204). Regarding claim 52, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 50, wherein the main body of the first correcting component and second component comprises a material sufficiently rigid to remain in position during a time period of use sufficient to correct a deformity in the external ear (figure 8B, maintains shape). Regarding claim 53, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 50, wherein the main body of the first correcting component comprises a first surface, a second opposing surface and a hole (214) extending through the first and second surfaces for passing sound waves through the main body (figure 4D). Regarding claim 54, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 50, further comprising an attachment component (100, 140) configured for securing the first correcting component against the surface of the external ear. Regarding claim 55, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 54, wherein the attachment component comprises a slot (see image above) for receiving the extended tab therethrough. Regarding claim 56, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 55, wherein the slot has a shape and size matching the tab of the main body of the first correcting component (figure 8B, 8C). Regarding claim 57, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 54, the attachment component (214) has an opening to allow sound waves to pass therethrough. Regarding claim 58, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 54, wherein the attachment component comprises an adhesive (paragraph 0078). Regarding claim 59, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 50, further comprising a third correcting component (240) configured for positioning within, or in contact with, a fossa triangularis of the external ear (figure 4A, functional limitations are not given full patentable weight, as long as the prior art meets the structural limitations in the claim and is capable of performing the recited functions, the prior art meets the claims). Regarding claim 60, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 50, further comprising a third correcting component (240) having a main body shaped for extending across a portion of the external ear, the main body comprising a first portion configured for contacting a helix of the internal ear and a second portion configured for contacting an anterior surface of the external ear (figure 8B, functional limitations are not given full patentable weight, as long as the prior art meets the structural limitations in the claim and is capable of performing the recited functions, the prior art meets the claims). Regarding claim 61, Weinstein discloses all of the limitations set forth in claim 60, wherein the third correcting component is configured to secure the first correcting component in position within the conchal bowl of the ear (figure 9B). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANH TIEU DANG whose telephone number is (571)270-3221. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday (9am-4pm EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Darwin Erezo can be reached at (571) 272-4695. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANH T DANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 17, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 17, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
May 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Sep 18, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Dec 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 18, 2025
Interview Requested
Jan 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589028
GRASPING STRUCTURE FOR MEMBRANE REMOVAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582436
EXTERNAL NEEDLE GUIDE AND ANCHOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12551671
SURGICAL DILATORS AND ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551334
SURGICAL IMPLANT DELIVERY WITH LOCKABLE PLUNGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544094
Pulse Control For Ultrasonic Tool Systems
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+35.8%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 633 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month