Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/235,441

BASE PLATE ATTACHMENT STRUCTURE WITH SWIVEL LOCK

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Aug 18, 2023
Examiner
HELVEY, PETER N.
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allow Rate
754 granted / 1386 resolved
-15.6% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
1447
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.3%
+14.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1386 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention 1, Species A in the reply filed on 12/19/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 18-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/19/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6, 8, and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6 defines the scope of the mounting feet in terms of the mounting feet’s relationship to the aperture of the base plate. Specifically, lines 1-2 of claim 6 recite "the plurality of mounting feet are received within one single mounting aperture in an interference fit”. The claims, however, do not explicitly define the mounting feet and base plate aperture in combination. Because of this conflict, the claim must be amended to positively recite the combination or the features of the mounting feet must be defined by other explicit means. The language “the plurality of mounting feet are received within one single mounting aperture in an interference fit” will therefore be treated as functional in nature when the claims are applied to the prior art herein. Claim 8 defines the scope of the lock tab in terms of the lock tab’s relationship to the lock aperture of the base plate. Specifically, lines 2-4 of claim 8 recite " the at least one tab is received within a lock aperture formed within the base plate, the lock aperture being different from the one mounting aperture”. The claims, however, do not explicitly define the lock tab and base plate lock aperture in combination. Because of this conflict, the claim must be amended to positively recite the combination or the features of the lock tab must be defined by other explicit means. The language “the at least one tab is received within a lock aperture formed within the base plate, the lock aperture being different from the one mounting aperture” will therefore be treated as functional in nature when the claims are applied to the prior art herein. Claim 9 is rejected for incorporating the indefinite limitations of claim 8 by dependency. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Brunner et al. (US 10583962, hereinafter ‘Brunner’). Brunner discloses an attachment structure, comprising: a base support (main container body 202) with a plurality of mounting feet (240, 258) and a lock (230) separate from the base support, wherein the base support is configurable to hold one or more items on a base plate, and wherein the plurality of mounting feet are configured to be received within one mounting aperture of the base plate (functional recitations). Brunner further discloses the base support includes a base surface with at least one attachment interface (236, 248) that cooperates with a support member to hold the one or more items; the base support includes a flange surrounding a majority of the base surface and a wall that transitions from an inner peripheral portion of the flange to the base surface such that the base surface comprises a raised boss (see Figs. 9A-9C); the base support includes a first side with the base surface and a second side facing opposite the first side, and wherein the plurality of mounting feet extend outwardly of the second side of the base support and are spaced circumferentially apart from each other (see Fig. 8C); each mounting foot comprises a base end attached to the base support and which extends to a distal end that is bent at an angle relative to the base end (see Fig. 3A for better view of mounting foot orientation); the plurality of mounting feet are received within one single mounting aperture in an interference fit (functional recitation); the attachment structure includes an arm that that has a first end (see Fig. 8C, end above 230) associated with the base support and a second end associated with the lock (end @ 235); the lock comprises at least one tab (235) that extends outwardly of a base plate facing surface of the arm (see Fig. 8C), and wherein the at least one tab is received within a lock aperture formed within the base plate, the lock aperture being different from the one mounting aperture (functional recitation); the arm comprises an elongated body that extends from the first end to the second end, and wherein the second end of the arm comprises a distal end portion that is bent at an angle relative to the elongated body (see Fig. 8C) to provide a grippable portion (functional recitation). Brunner further discloses an attachment system, comprising: a base plate (206) having a plurality of mounting apertures (236); and an attachment structure comprising a base support (202) with a plurality of mounting feet (240, 258) and a lock (230) separate from the base support, wherein the base support is configurable to hold one or more items, and wherein the plurality of mounting feet are received within one mounting aperture of the plurality of mounting apertures to attach the attachment structure to the base plate (Fig. 9B); the base plate is mounted within a cargo area of a vehicle (functional recitation). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16 and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER N. HELVEY whose telephone number is (571)270-1423. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10am-7pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER N HELVEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734 March 16, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 18, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602012
WATCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593903
CONTAINMENT MAT THAT CONVERTS TO LUGGAGE WITH SECURE SEAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588747
Holder for Container
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583395
RAIL TOP CARGO MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12559290
REUSEABLE GIFT WRAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+18.6%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1386 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month