Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/235,736

INTELLIGENT INTEGRATED EQUIPMENT FOR A WHOLE PROCESS OF QUALITY INSPECTION AND TESTING OF ALUMINUM ALLOY AND ALUMINUM INGOTS

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Aug 18, 2023
Examiner
CARTER, CHRISTOPHER W
Art Unit
2117
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Guiyang Aluminum Magnesium Design & Research Institute Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
259 granted / 351 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
385
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 351 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-10 filed on 8/18/2023 have been reviewed and considered by this office action. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. CN2023102723894, filed on 3/20/2023. Drawings The drawings filed on 8/18/2023 have been reviewed and are considered acceptable. Specification The specification filed on 8/18/2023 has been reviewed and is considered acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed towards an abstract idea without significantly more. Claim 1 recites, “analyzing product quality by using a composition quality analysis control model.”, which analyzed under Step 2A Prong One, provides analysis of product quality using a product quality model, which per the specification filed on 8/18/2023, paragraph [0080], simply receives input as to content of each component produced and a determination is made as to whether the component deviates from a target component, which is an act that one can reasonably perform in the human mind given the same data, and thus, falls within the, “Mental Processes” grouping of abstract ideas. This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application. Claim 1 additionally includes the limitations of, “the integrated control center is configured for sending detection results to the display device for display;”, which analyzed under Step 2A Prong Two, simply sends detection results to be displayed on a device, which just simply applies the use of the judicial exception (see MPEP 2106.05(f)). Claim 1 further includes the limitations of, “the automatic sample detection system is configured for detecting element composition of the turn-milled samples according to a detection instruction from the integrated control center, sending a detection result to the integrated control center, and conveying detected samples to the sample filing and warehousing system for filing and warehousing;” and “the data fusion system is configured for collecting sampling information, sample delivery information of the pneumatic sample conveying system, preparation information of the automatic sample preparation system, detection information of the automatic sample detection system and warehousing information of the sample filing and warehousing system, and obtaining a proportioning adjustment scheme according to the sampling information, the sample delivery information, the preparation information, the detection information and the warehousing information by using an aluminum alloy proportioning model and an aluminum ingot proportioning model,”, which analyzed under Step 2A Prong Two, includes limitations of gathering and sending data which adds insignificant extra solution activity in the form of mere data gathering (see MPEP 2106.05(g)). Continuing, claim 1 includes the limitations of, “An intelligent integrated equipment for a whole process of quality inspection and testing of aluminum alloy and aluminum ingots, comprising a pneumatic sample conveying system, an automatic sample preparation system, an automatic sample detection system, a sample filing and warehousing system, an integrated control center, a display device and a data fusion system;”, “wherein the integrated control center is connected with the automatic sample preparation system, the automatic sample detection system and the display device; the data fusion system is connected with the pneumatic sample conveying system, the automatic sample preparation system, the automatic sample detection system and the sample filing and warehousing system;”, “the pneumatic sample conveying system is configured for pneumatically conveying samples taken out from a mixing furnace or a holding furnace to the automatic sample preparation system;”, and “the automatic sample preparation system is configured for turn-milling the samples according to a sample preparation instruction from the integrated control center, and conveying turn-milled samples to the automatic sample detection system; the turn-milled samples are aluminum alloys or aluminum ingots to be detected;”, which analyzed under Step 2A Prong Two, merely describes a plurality of systems, their associated functions, and how they are connected within the system which just simply directs the use of the judicial exception to a particular technological environment or field of use (see MPEP 2106.05(h)). The claim does not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because as analyzed under Step 2B, the additional elements merely amount to gathering product production and composition data of metals/alloys and sending the data over a network. Analyzed under Berkheimer, the act of gathering and sending data over a network has been deemed as well-understood, routine, and conventional by the courts (see MPEP 2106.05(d)(II), “sending/receiving data over a network”). Review of the dependent claims reveals that claims 3 and 5 each include limitations of transmitting/receiving of gathered data, which analyzed under Step 2A Prong Two, adds insignificant extra solution activity in the form of mere data gathering (see MPEP 2106.05(g)). Further, claims 2-10, each include detailed descriptions regarding the physical aspects as well as construction of the various machines/stations of the present analysis system, which analyzed under Step 2A Prong Two, just simply links the use of the judicial exception to a particular technological environment or field of use (see MPEP 2106.05(h)). As such, none of the dependent claims, alone or in combination, provide additional support that would represent more than the abstract idea itself. Allowable Subject Matter The office would like to first mention that the present identified claim has an outstanding 35 U.S.C. 101 issue that must be resolved prior to consideration for allowance. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 1 of the present application recites, “An intelligent integrated equipment for a whole process of quality inspection and testing of aluminum alloy and aluminum ingots, comprising a pneumatic sample conveying system, an automatic sample preparation system, an automatic sample detection system, a sample filing and warehousing system, an integrated control center, a display device and a data fusion system; wherein the integrated control center is connected with the automatic sample preparation system, the automatic sample detection system and the display device; the data fusion system is connected with the pneumatic sample conveying system, the automatic sample preparation system, the automatic sample detection system and the sample filing and warehousing system; the pneumatic sample conveying system is configured for pneumatically conveying samples taken out from a mixing furnace or a holding furnace to the automatic sample preparation system; the automatic sample preparation system is configured for turn-milling the samples according to a sample preparation instruction from the integrated control center, and conveying turn-milled samples to the automatic sample detection system; the turn-milled samples are aluminum alloys or aluminum ingots to be detected; the automatic sample detection system is configured for detecting element composition of the turn-milled samples according to a detection instruction from the integrated control center, sending a detection result to the integrated control center, and conveying detected samples to the sample filing and warehousing system for filing and warehousing; the integrated control center is configured for sending detection results to the display device for display; the data fusion system is configured for collecting sampling information, sample delivery information of the pneumatic sample conveying system, preparation information of the automatic sample preparation system, detection information of the automatic sample detection system and warehousing information of the sample filing and warehousing system, and obtaining a proportioning adjustment scheme according to the sampling information, the sample delivery information, the preparation information, the detection information and the warehousing information by using an aluminum alloy proportioning model and an aluminum ingot proportioning model, and analyzing product quality by using a composition quality analysis control model.” The closet prior art of record is Kim et al. (US PGPUB 20100230065). Kim discloses a project management system for molten aluminum which tracks and records various details of aluminum during a production process. The system includes recording quality data of the aluminum post production in the melting furnace as well as heat retaining furnace and provides recorded data to respective servers to track quality of the molten aluminum. However, Kim merely discloses quality information gathering of molten aluminum, but does not utilize any models or data for analysis that can then be utilized to display results. Further, Kim lacks a lot of the physical features utilized in the quality gathering process that is expressed in the present application. As such, Kim is silent on, “An intelligent integrated equipment for a whole process of quality inspection and testing of aluminum alloy and aluminum ingots, comprising a pneumatic sample conveying system, an automatic sample preparation system, an automatic sample detection system, a sample filing and warehousing system, an integrated control center, a display device and a data fusion system; wherein the integrated control center is connected with the automatic sample preparation system, the automatic sample detection system and the display device; the data fusion system is connected with the pneumatic sample conveying system, the automatic sample preparation system, the automatic sample detection system and the sample filing and warehousing system; the pneumatic sample conveying system is configured for pneumatically conveying samples taken out from a mixing furnace or a holding furnace to the automatic sample preparation system; the automatic sample preparation system is configured for turn-milling the samples according to a sample preparation instruction from the integrated control center, and conveying turn-milled samples to the automatic sample detection system; the turn-milled samples are aluminum alloys or aluminum ingots to be detected; the automatic sample detection system is configured for detecting element composition of the turn-milled samples according to a detection instruction from the integrated control center, sending a detection result to the integrated control center, and conveying detected samples to the sample filing and warehousing system for filing and warehousing; the integrated control center is configured for sending detection results to the display device for display; the data fusion system is configured for collecting sampling information, sample delivery information of the pneumatic sample conveying system, preparation information of the automatic sample preparation system, detection information of the automatic sample detection system and warehousing information of the sample filing and warehousing system, and obtaining a proportioning adjustment scheme according to the sampling information, the sample delivery information, the preparation information, the detection information and the warehousing information by using an aluminum alloy proportioning model and an aluminum ingot proportioning model, and analyzing product quality by using a composition quality analysis control model.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sugita et al. (US PGPUB 20110300397): disclose a system and method for casting aluminum alloy rods wherein the system includes a quality evaluation unit for detecting a plurality of inspection points regarding the aluminum rods. Zhao (CN 116090805A): disclose an alloy manufacturing system and method which employs an AI algorithm for collecting real-time casting quality feedback, and providing real-time manufacturing adjustments to address the quality issues. Genna et al. (US Patent 5,030,577): disclose an in-line sampling method for use in an alloy production system. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER W CARTER whose telephone number is (469)295-9262. The examiner can normally be reached 9-6:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Fennema can be reached at (571) 272-2748. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER W CARTER/Examiner, Art Unit 2117
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 18, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596355
INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS, METHODS AND MEDIUMS FOR EARLY WARNING OF DESCENDING FUNCTION FAULT OF EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591227
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANOMALY RECOGNITION AND DETECTION USING LIFELONG DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585936
NEURAL LOGIC CONTROLLERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585247
COMPONENT INTERFACE MODULE WITH ENHANCED USER CONVENIENCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578689
METHOD, MEASUREMENT SYSTEM CONTROLLER, AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+20.6%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 351 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month