Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/239,572

PRE-ASSEMBLED COUPLING ASSEMBLIES WITH PIPE FITTING

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 29, 2023
Priority
Jul 28, 2017 — provisional 62/538,480 +2 more
Examiner
KEE, FANNIE C
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Asc Engineered Solutions LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
542 granted / 776 resolved
+17.8% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
802
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
59.8%
+19.8% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 776 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 5/11/26 has been entered. Election/Restrictions Claim 14 has been withdrawn from further consideration by Applicant. Claim 22 is still withdrawn as claim 22 has not been amended to read on the elected embodiment of Figures 5A-10. It is noted that Applicant argues that claim 22 has been amended to read on the elected embodiment, however, the only amendment to claim 22 was to change the dependency of claim 22 to claim 13. Therefore, claim 22 is still withdrawn. Claim Status Claims 1-3, 5-10 and 12-22 are pending. Examiner acknowledges Applicant’s amendments to claims 1, 5, 8, 13 and 15, previously canceled claims 4 and 11 and withdrawn claims 3, 6, 7, 10, 14, 20 and 22. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 5/11/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. With regard to claim 1, Applicant argues that neither Storcks nor Westerlund discloses wherein the sealing surface is configured to contact a gasket of the coupling when the coupling is in a tensioned position to seal the pipe fitting with the gasket. Examiner disagrees. First, as noted in the rejection below, the coupling and gasket are not a part of the claimed invention of the pipe fitting of claim 1. Second, as set forth in the rejection below, the sealing surface in both Storcks and Westerlund is capable of being configured to contact a gasket of a coupling that the pipe fitting would be coupled to. Therefore, Storcks and Westerlund both disclose the claimed limitation. With regard to claim 8, Applicant argues that Westerlund does not disclose a sealing surface configured to contact a surface of the gasket to seal the pipe fitting with the gasket in a tightened position. Examiner disagrees. As set forth in the rejection below, Westerlund discloses that the sealing surface is configured to contact a surface of the gasket that extends down between the coupling and pipe fitting. Therefore, Westerlund discloses the claimed limitation. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5 and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Storcks German Patent No. DE 198 51 723 A1. With regard to claim 1, and as shown in Figure 2, Storcks discloses a pipe fitting configured for engagement with a coupling (wherein the pipe fitting is capable of being configured for engagement with a coupling), the pipe fitting comprising: a raised lip end defining a raised lip (at 25); a distal end (end at 16) disposed opposite from the raised lip end, the raised lip (at 25) between the distal end and the raised lip end; a groove (at 27) between the raised lip (at 25) and the distal end (end at 16); and a sealing surface (see below) positioned between the raised lip (at 25) and the groove (at 27), wherein the raised lip extends radially outward from the sealing surface, and the groove extends radially inward from the sealing surface; wherein the sealing surface is configured to contact a gasket of the coupling when the coupling is in a tensioned position to seal the pipe fitting with the gasket (wherein the sealing surface of the pipe fitting is capable of being configured to contact a gasket of a coupling). Note: the coupling and the gasket are not a part of the claimed invention. PNG media_image1.png 308 286 media_image1.png Greyscale With regard to claim 2, Storcks discloses wherein the pipe fitting is selected from the group consisting of an elbow (as shown in Fig 2). With regard to claim 5, and as shown in Figure 2, Storcks discloses wherein the pipe fitting defines: an outer lip (at 28) disposed between the groove (at 27) and the distal end (end at 16). With regard to claim 21, and as shown in Figure 2, Storcks discloses an outer lip (at 28) positioned between the raised lip (at 25) and the distal end (end at 16). Claim(s) 1, 5, 8, 12-15 and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Westerlund et al U.S. Patent No. 4,311,248. With regard to claim 1, and as shown in Figure 3, Westerlund et al disclose a pipe fitting configured for engagement with a coupling (where the pipe fitting is capable of being configured for engagement with a coupling), the pipe fitting comprising: a raised lip end defining a raised lip (see below); a distal end (see below) disposed opposite from the raised lip end, the raised lip between the distal end and the raised lip end; a groove (see below) between the raised lip and the distal end; and a sealing surface (see below, also column 3, lines 30-35) positioned between the raised lip (see below) and the groove (see below), wherein the raised lip extends radially outward from the sealing surface, and the groove extends radially inward from the sealing surface (see below); wherein the sealing surface is configured to contact a gasket of the coupling when the coupling is in a tensioned position to seal the pipe fitting with the gasket (wherein the sealing surface of the pipe fitting is capable of being configured to contact a gasket of a coupling). Note: the coupling and the gasket are not a part of the claimed invention. PNG media_image2.png 271 432 media_image2.png Greyscale With regard to claim 5, and as shown in Figure 3, Westerlund et al disclose wherein the pipe fitting defines: an outer lip (see above) disposed between the groove and the distal end. With regard to claim 8, and as shown in Figure 3, Westerlund et al disclose a coupling assembly comprising: a coupling (see above) defining a coupling bore extending through the coupling, the coupling comprising a gasket (see above) disposed within the coupling bore; and a pipe fitting defining a raised lip end and a distal end disposed opposite from the raised lip end (see above), the raised lip end having a raised lip (see above), the pipe fitting further defining a groove (see above) between the raised lip and the distal end, the pipe fitting further defining a sealing surface (see above, also column 3, lines 30-35) configured to contact a surface of the gasket to seal the pipe fitting with the gasket in a tightened position (as shown below where the sealing surface is configured to contact a surface of the gasket that extends down between the coupling and pipe fitting), the sealing surface positioned between the raised lip and the groove, the raised lip extending radially outward from the sealing surface, and the groove extending radially inward from the sealing surface, and the raised lip end inserted into the coupling bore (see above); wherein in a relaxed position: the gasket is relaxed and uncompressed (where there is no tension on the gasket when the coupling is not fastened to the pipe fitting); and the coupling is retained on the raised lip end of the pipe fitting (via engagement between the raised lip end and the coupling as shown in Figure 3). PNG media_image3.png 200 238 media_image3.png Greyscale With regard to claim 12, and as shown in Figure 3, Westerlund et al disclose wherein the pipe fitting is positioned within the coupling bore disposed radially outward from the gasket (as shown in Figure 3). With regard to claim 13, and as shown in Figure 3, Westerlund et al disclose further comprising an outer lip on the pipe fitting (see above), wherein the coupling defines a ridge (see above), and the outer lip is configured to locate the ridge of the coupling above the groove of the pipe fitting. With regard to claim 15, and as shown in Figure 3, Westerlund et al disclose wherein the gasket defines a center ridge (see above) that contacts the raised lip when the coupling is in a tensioned position. With regard to claim 21, and as shown in Figure 3, Westerlund et al disclose an outer lip (see above) positioned between the raised lip (see above) and the distal end (see above). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Westerlund et al in view of Storcks. With regard to claim 2, Westerlund discloses the claimed invention but does not disclose that the pipe fitting is an elbow. Storcks teaches that a pipe fitting can be an elbow (as shown in Figure 2) which provides a connection for angled fluid flow. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the pipe fitting be an elbow with a reasonable expectation of success to provide an angled connection as shown by Storcks and because a change in the shape of a prior art device is a design consideration within the level of skill of one skilled in the art. In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). With regard to claim 9, Westerlund discloses the claimed invention but does not disclose that the pipe fitting is an elbow. Storcks teaches that a pipe fitting can be an elbow (as shown in Figure 2) which provides a connection for angled fluid flow. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the pipe fitting be an elbow with a reasonable expectation of success to provide an angled connection as shown by Storcks and because a change in the shape of a prior art device is a design consideration within the level of skill of one skilled in the art. In re Dailey, 357 F.2d 669, 149 USPQ 47 (CCPA 1966). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-19 were previously allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FANNIE KEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1820. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at 571-270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /F.K./Examiner, Art Unit 3679 /Matthew Troutman/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 04, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
May 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680639
Genderless Aseptic Connector
5y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680636
Sealing Device and Method for the Production Thereof and Pipeline System
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680635
HYGIENIC CLAMP WITH POSITION FEEDBACK
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12650192
CONNECTION DEVICE FOR VALVES AND VALVE ARRANGEMENT EQUIPPED THEREWITH
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12624783
CONNECTOR AND CONNECTING SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.6%)
3y 4m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 776 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month