Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/240,518

ENHANCED SECONDARY UPLINK (eSUL) MEASUREMENT, MOBILITY, AND ACCESS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 31, 2023
Examiner
RAHMAN, SHAH M
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
372 granted / 461 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
520
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
57.1%
+17.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 461 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 01/27/2025 and 03/19/2025 have been placed in record and considered by the examiner. SUMMARY This action is in reply to Applicant’s Amendments and Remarks filed on 11/12/2025. Claims 1-30 are pending. Claims 1-16 are elected for prosecution. Claims 17-30 are withdrawn. NOTICE for all US Patent Applications filed on or after March 16, 2013 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 7, 9-10 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Cirik et al. (US 20220022250 A1, of IDS, hereinafter ‘CIRIK’). Regarding claim 1, CIRIK teaches a method at an apparatus ( Fig. 3 Wireless Device 110, [0195] FIG. 3 is a block diagram of base stations (base station 1, 120A, and base station 2, 120B) and a wireless device 110. A wireless device may be called an UE. A base station may be called a NB, eNB, gNB, and/or ng-eNB. [0208] The wireless device 110 may comprise at least one communication interface 310 (e.g. a wireless modem, an antenna, and/or the like), at least one processor 314, and at least one set of program code instructions 316 stored in non-transitory memory 315 and executable by the at least one processor 314. ), comprising: receiving, in a downlink on a first cell, scheduling information configured to schedule a secondary uplink on a second cell, different from the first cell ( [0461] For example, a base station may configure a NUL and DL over a first frequency (e.g., high frequency). An SUL may be configured over a second frequency (e.g., low frequency) to support uplink transmission (e.g., in terms of coverage and/or capacity) of a cell. [0474] configured, by a base station, with an SUL carrier of a cell. When the wireless device is configured with the SUL carrier, the wireless device may be configured with two or more uplink carriers (e.g., SUL and NUL) for one downlink of the cell. … [0475] In an example, the base station may avoid overlapping (e.g., in time) of a first uplink transmission (e.g., PUSCH) via the SUL carrier and a second uplink transmission (e.g., PUSCH) via the NUL carrier by scheduling. In an example, the base station may configure one or more PUSCH resources (e.g., PUSCH-Config) for the SUL carrier. …….The wireless device may receive a downlink control information (DCI) comprising a carrier indicator field. The DCI may indicate an uplink grant. In an example, a value of the carrier indicator field in the DCI may indicate an UL carrier (e.g., NUL carrier or SUL carrier) of the one or more UL carriers to perform one or more PUSCH transmissions.); at least one of: receiving downlink reference signals on the first cell ( [0459] For a random access procedure in licensed bands, based on a measurement (e.g., RSRP) of one or more DL pathloss references, a wireless device may determine which carrier (e.g., between NUL and SUL) to use. For example, a wireless device may select a first uplink carrier (e.g., SUL or NUL carrier) if a measured quality (e.g., RSRP) of DL pathloss references is lower than a broadcast threshold (e.g., an RRC parameter, rsrp-ThresholdSSB-SUL). [0464] For example, if a wireless device transmits quality information of one or more measurements on one or more DL reference signals associated with NUL carrier(s) …… a base station may select a carrier between NUL carrier(s) and/or SUL carrier(s) based on the quality of the one or more measurements. [0521] In an example, the wireless device may measure/assess the one or more first pathloss RSs (e.g., SSB/PBCH block, CSI-RS) for a path loss estimation.), or receiving radio resource control signaling configuring a third cell on which the downlink reference signals are received, the third cell being the same as or different from the first cell ( [0196] ….. At RRC connection re-establishment/handover, one serving cell may provide the security input. This cell may be referred to as the Primary Cell (PCell). ….Depending on wireless device capabilities, Secondary Cells (SCells) may be configured to form together with a PCell a set of serving cells. [0198] A base station may transmit to a wireless device one or more messages (e.g. RRC messages) comprising a plurality of configuration parameters for one or more cells. One or more cells may comprise at least one primary cell and at least one secondary cell. [0203] When CA is configured, a wireless device may have an RRC connection with a network. At RRC connection establishment/re-establishment/handover procedure, one serving cell may provide NAS mobility information….. [0204] The reconfiguration, addition and removal of SCells may be performed by RRC. At intra-NR handover, RRC may also add, remove, or reconfigure SCells for usage with the target PCell. [0455] …. a base station may configure a wireless device with one or more UL carriers associated with one DL carrier of a cell. One of the one or more UL carriers configured with a DL carrier may be referred to as …… a normal UL (NUL or may be referred to as a non-SUL) carrier …. [0461] For example, a base station may configure a NUL and DL over a first frequency (e.g., high frequency).), and receiving the downlink reference signals on the third cell ( [0464] For example, if a wireless device transmits quality information of one or more measurements on one or more DL reference signals associated with NUL carrier(s)); and transmitting the secondary uplink on the second cell ( [0350] a random access resource selection is performed when Msg3 is being retransmitted, a wireless device may select the same group of Random Access Preambles as was used for the Random Access Preamble transmission attempt corresponding to the first transmission of Msg3. [0461] An SUL may be configured over a second frequency (e.g., low frequency) to support uplink transmission (e.g., in terms of coverage and/or capacity) of a cell. In an example, a broadcast threshold (e.g., an RRC parameter, rsrp-ThresholdSSB-SUL) for a wireless device to select a carrier may be determined such that a wireless device located outside a NUL coverage but inside an SUL coverage may start a random access procedure via an SUL. [0475] …. a value of the carrier indicator field in the DCI may indicate an UL carrier (e.g., … SUL carrier) of the one or more UL carriers to perform one or more PUSCH transmissions. [0488] In an example, a wireless device may initiate a random-access procedure on a serving cell (e.g., PCell, SCell). In an example, a measured quality (e.g., RSRP) of downlink pathloss reference of the serving cell may be lower than an uplink carrier threshold (e.g., an RRC parameter, rsrp-ThresholdSSB-SUL). In an example, when a base station does not indicate/signal (e.g., explicitly), to the wireless device, an UL carrier to use for the random-access procedure on the serving cell and the serving cell is configured with a higher layer SUL parameter, the wireless device may select the SUL carrier to perform the random-access procedure in response to the measured quality (e.g., RSRP) of the downlink pathloss reference of the serving cell being lower than the uplink carrier threshold.). Regarding claim 2, CIRIK teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the secondary uplink has no associated downlink in the second cell ( [0461] For example, a base station may configure a NUL and DL over a first frequency (e.g., high frequency). An SUL may be configured over a second frequency (e.g., low frequency) to support uplink transmission (e.g., in terms of coverage and/or capacity) of a cell. [0474] configured, by a base station, with an SUL carrier of a cell. When the wireless device is configured with the SUL carrier, the wireless device may be configured with two or more uplink carriers (e.g., SUL and NUL) for one downlink of the cell. …). Regarding claim 7, CIRIK teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the secondary uplink on the second cell, and another uplink on at least one of: the first cell, or the third cell belong to a same timing advance group (TAG) ( [0460] In an example, a base station may configure NUL and SUL with a TAG. For example, for an uplink transmission of a first uplink carrier (e.g., SUL) of a cell, a wireless device may employ a TA value received during a random access procedure via a second uplink carrier (e.g., NUL) of the cell.). Regarding claim 9, the claim is interpreted mutatis mutandis of claim 1 and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 1. Regarding claim 10, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 2. Regarding claim 15, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 7. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 3-4 and 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cirik et al. (US 20220022250 A1, of IDS, hereinafter ‘CIRIK’) in view of LEI et al. (US 20210045159 A1, hereinafter ‘LEI’). Regarding claim 3, CIRIK teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: transmitting the secondary uplink on the second cell at a transmit power level determined with the downlink reference signals received on the at least one of: the first cell in response to receiving the downlink reference signals on the first cell ( [0225] …. In downlink, a base station may transmit (e.g., unicast, multicast, and/or broadcast) one or more RSs to a UE. For example, the one or more RSs may be at least one of Primary Synchronization Signal (PSS)/Secondary Synchronization Signal (SSS) 521 …. [0320] In an example, a base station may transmit one or more RRC message to configure a wireless device at least one of following parameters: [0321] prach-ConfigIndex: the available set of PRACH occasions for the transmission of the Random Access Preamble [0322] preambleReceivedTargetPower: initial Random Access Preamble power; [0323] rsrp-ThresholdSSB: an RSRP threshold for the selection of the SSB and corresponding Random Access Preamble and/or PRACH occasion….. [0345] In an example, a wireless device may employ one or more parameters for a random access procedure. For example, a wireless device may employ at least one of PREAMBLE_INDEX; PREAMBLE_TRANSMISSION_COUNTER; PREAMBLE_POWER_RAMPING_COUNTER; PREAMBLE_POWER_RAMPING_STEP; PREAMBLE_RECEIVED_TARGET_POWER; [0456] A base station may transmit, to a wireless device, one or more RRC messages comprising configuration parameters for a carrier, wherein the configuration parameters may indicate at least one of random access procedure configuration, …. and/or a power control parameters. [0457] In an example, a base station may configure an SUL carrier and a NUL carrier to support a random access procedure (e.g., initial access). For example, as shown in FIG. 12, to support a random access to a cell configured with SUL, a base station may configure a RACH configuration 1210 of SUL independent of a RACH configuration 1210 of NUL. [0488] In an example, a wireless device may initiate a random-access procedure on a serving cell (e.g., PCell, SCell). In an example, a measured quality (e.g., RSRP) of downlink pathloss reference of the serving cell may be lower than an uplink carrier threshold (e.g., an RRC parameter, rsrp-ThresholdSSB-SUL). In an example, when a base station does not indicate/signal (e.g., explicitly), to the wireless device, an UL carrier to use for the random-access procedure on the serving cell and the serving cell is configured with a higher layer SUL parameter, the wireless device may select the SUL carrier to perform the random-access procedure in response to the measured quality (e.g., RSRP) of the downlink pathloss reference of the serving cell being lower than the uplink carrier threshold. [0521] In an example, the wireless device may measure/assess the one or more first pathloss RSs (e.g., SSB/PBCH block, CSI-RS) for a path loss estimation. (Construed that UE transmits on SUL with an uplink configured power based on measurement result of SSB as downlink reference signals for NUL or SUL selection)), or the third cell in response to receiving the radio resource control signaling configuring the third cell. CIRIK does not explicitly disclose transmitting the secondary uplink on the second cell with at a transmit power level or with a timing control determined with the downlink reference signals received on the at least one of: the first cell in response to receiving the downlink reference signals on the first cell, or the third cell in response to receiving the radio resource control signaling configuring the third cell. In an analogous art, LEI teaches transmitting the secondary uplink on the second cell with at a transmit power level or with a timing control determined with the downlink reference signals received on the at least one of: the first cell in response to receiving the downlink reference signals on the first cell ( [0095] A UE is typically provided with N synchronization signal (SS) and/or physical broadcast channel (PBCH) blocks (SSBs), with each SSB associated with one msgA occasion. If N is less than one, then one SS block may be mapped to 1/N sets of message RACH occasion (RO) and message physical resource units (PRU). If N is greater than or equal to one, then N consecutive SS blocks may be mapped to a set of message ROs and message PRUs…. (It is obvious that UE determines SSB as timing control reference) [0096] In some cases, the strength in which an SSB is detected may impact the criteria for validating a msgA transmission occasion. For example, a UE may be provided with M thresholds for the signal quality measurement (S.sub.i), sorted ascending order (e.g., S.sub.1<S.sub.2< . . . S.sub.M) …. [0097] In some cases, the validation criteria may involve the signal quality measurement (S.sub.i) being above a first threshold level. [0099] In certain aspects, the validation criteria may depend on at least one of a maximum power of the UE and bandwidth available for selected message transmission occasion. [0101] As illustrated, the BS may broadcast the SSB, system information block (SIB), and reference signal (RS) with system information (or RRC signaling) with configuration information for the two-step RACH procedure. As illustrated, the UE performs Layer 1 (L1) reference signal receive power (RSRP) measurement (e.g., of the SSBs). [0102] The UE may select an msgA occasion (associated with the detected SSB) and evaluate (validate) the selected msgA occasion based on the L1-RSRP measurement and size of the msgA payload, as described above. In some cases, the evaluation may also consider other factors, such as the maximum transmission power [0105] In some cases, the criteria for validating a selected msgA transmission occasion may involve the processing capabilities of the UE……. The validation may also involve the UE's capability to support carrier aggregation (CA), dual connectivity (DC), and supplementary uplink (SUL) (It is obvious that UE transmits the secondary uplink on SUL or the second cell at a transmit power level with a timing control determined based on received SSB as at a PCell or SCell, as well known in the art, when UE supporting CA and DC uses a SUL)), or the third cell in response to receiving the radio resource control signaling configuring the third cell. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of measuring SSB as downlink reference signals for timing control and uplink transmission power control to support carrier aggregation (CA), dual connectivity (DC), and supplementary uplink (SUL) of LEI to the technique of selecting an uplink carrier among the NUL carrier and the SUL carrier based on a measured SSB quality for a random-access procedure of the cell of CIRIK in order to take the advantage of a method providing improved reliability of message decoding and reduced complexity of blind decoding using a finite set of ROs and PRUs for reducing monitoring overhead (blind decodes) by a base station for further improvements in NR and LTE technology (LEI: [0005, 0006, 0078]). Regarding claim 4, CIRIK teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: using the downlink reference signals in connection with at least one of: layer 3 radio resource management (L3 RRM), layer 1 beam management/inter-cell beam management (L1 BM/ICBM), determining a transmit power level ( See [0225. 0321-0323, 0345, 0456, 0488] cited for claim 3.), or determining a timing control, in association with the secondary uplink on the second cell and another uplink on at least one of: the first cell, or the third cell ( [0459] For a random access procedure in licensed bands, based on a measurement (e.g., RSRP) of one or more DL pathloss references, a wireless device may determine which carrier (e.g., between NUL and SUL) to use. For example, a wireless device may select a first uplink carrier (e.g., SUL or NUL carrier) if a measured quality (e.g., RSRP) of DL pathloss references is lower than a broadcast threshold (e.g., an RRC parameter, rsrp-ThresholdSSB-SUL). If a wireless device selects a carrier between SUL carrier and NUL carrier for a random access procedure, one or more uplink transmissions associated with the random access procedure may remain on the selected uplink carrier. See also [0462, 0488] cited for claim 3). CIRIK does not explicitly disclose using the downlink reference signals in connection with at least one of: layer 3 radio resource management (L3 RRM), layer 1 beam management/inter-cell beam management (L1 BM/ICBM), determining a transmit power level, determining a timing control, in association with the secondary uplink on the second cell and another uplink on at least one of: the first cell, or the third cell. LEI teaches using the downlink reference signals in connection with at least one of: layer 3 radio resource management (L3 RRM), layer 1 beam management/inter-cell beam management (L1 BM/ICBM), determining a transmit power level, determining a timing control, in association with the secondary uplink on the second cell and another uplink on at least one of: the first cell, or the third cell ( [0095] A UE is typically provided with N synchronization signal (SS) and/or physical broadcast channel (PBCH) blocks (SSBs), with each SSB associated with one msgA occasion. If N is less than one, then one SS block may be mapped to 1/N sets of message RACH occasion (RO) and message physical resource units (PRU). If N is greater than or equal to one, then N consecutive SS blocks may be mapped to a set of message ROs and message PRUs…. (It is obvious that UE determines SSB as timing control reference) See [0096-0097, 0099, 0101] cited for claim 3, and further- [0102] The UE may select an msgA occasion (associated with the detected SSB) and evaluate (validate) the selected msgA occasion based on the L1-RSRP measurement and size of the msgA payload, as described above. In some cases, the evaluation may also consider other factors, such as the maximum transmission power [0105] In some cases, the criteria for validating a selected msgA transmission occasion may involve the processing capabilities of the UE……. The validation may also involve the UE's capability to support carrier aggregation (CA), dual connectivity (DC), and supplementary uplink (SUL) (It is obvious that UE transmits the secondary uplink on SUL or the second cell at a transmit power level with a timing control determined based on received SSB as at a PCell or SCell, as well known in the art, when UE supporting CA and DC uses a SUL)). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of measuring SSB as downlink reference signals for timing control and uplink transmission power control to support carrier aggregation (CA), dual connectivity (DC), and supplementary uplink (SUL) of LEI to the technique of selecting an uplink carrier among the NUL carrier and the SUL carrier based on a measured SSB quality for a random-access procedure of the cell of CIRIK in order to take the advantage of a method providing improved reliability of message decoding and reduced complexity of blind decoding using a finite set of ROs and PRUs for reducing monitoring overhead (blind decodes) by a base station for further improvements in NR and LTE technology (LEI: [0005, 0006, 0078]). Regarding claim 11, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 3. Regarding claim 12, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 4. Claims 5-6 and 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cirik et al. (US 20220022250 A1, of IDS, hereinafter ‘CIRIK’) in view of Freda et al. (US 20200396654 A1, hereinafter ‘FREDA’). Regarding claim 5, CIRIK teaches the method of claim 1. CIRIK does not explicitly disclose further comprising: independently executing mobility determinations for the secondary uplink on the second cell and another uplink on at least one of: the first cell, or the third cell ( although CIRIK discloses - [0203] When CA is configured, a wireless device may have an RRC connection with a network. At RRC connection establishment/re-establishment/handover procedure, one serving cell may provide NAS mobility information….. [0204] The reconfiguration, addition and removal of SCells may be performed by RRC. At intra-NR handover, RRC may also add, remove, or reconfigure SCells for usage with the target PCell. [0455] …. a base station may configure a wireless device with one or more UL carriers associated with one DL carrier of a cell. One of the one or more UL carriers configured with a DL carrier may be referred to as …… a normal UL (NUL or may be referred to as a non-SUL) carrier …. [0461] For example, a base station may configure a NUL and DL over a first frequency (e.g., high frequency). An SUL may be configured over a second frequency (e.g., low frequency) to support uplink transmission (e.g., in terms of coverage and/or capacity) of a cell. In an example, a broadcast threshold (e.g., an RRC parameter, rsrp-ThresholdSSB-SUL) for a wireless device to select a carrier may be determined such that a wireless device located outside a NUL coverage but inside an SUL coverage may start a random access procedure via an SUL. A wireless device located inside a NUL coverage may start a random access procedure via a NUL.). In an analogous art, FREDA teaches independently executing mobility determinations for the secondary uplink on the second cell and another uplink on at least one of: the first cell, or the third cell ( Fig. 2, [0084] FIG. 2 is a diagram of an example coverage map 200 of a cell 202 (e.g., a gNB). In high frequencies (e.g., high new radio (NR) frequencies), UL coverage of the cell 202 may be significantly less than DL coverage of the cell 202. The cell 202 may include a Supplementary UL (SUL), which for example, may be a lower frequency than the regular UL (RUL) and the downlink (DL) of the cell 202. The RUL and SUL may be paired with each DL of a cell (e.g., an SCell). A WTRU 204 may camp on the SUL when RSRP<SUL_threshold (e.g., when RSRP of the RUL is <SUL_threshold (e.g., when RSRP of the RUL is <SUL_threshold)……. The examples provided herein may, for example, be used to ensure that a WTRU camps on a cell having the best combination of downlink and uplink coverage in an environment with mixed SUL/non-SUL support.). [0156] WTRU behavior may adapt based on a triggering condition. For example, the WTRU may (e.g. in foregoing examples) inform lower layers of a need to switch to an SUL. A WTRU may (e.g. further) initiate a procedure in lower layers that may be associated with informing an NW of a UL switch. Upper layer(s) may initiate one or more lower-layer procedures such as, for example, one or more of the following: (i) initiation of a RACH procedure or RACH-like procedure in an SUL; (ii) transmission of an RRC message on a currently configured UL (e.g. RUL); (iii) transmission on a PUCCH (e.g. SR or other indication) on an SUL (e.g. when resources may be configured), and/or (iii) transmission of an RRC message on a master node (e.g. eNB/gNB), for example, when a WTRU may be configured with DC and/or when RUL/SUL configurations may be associated with transmission on a secondary node (SN) (e.g. gNB). [0158] a WTRU may transmit a switch indication message as an RRC message on an RUL, or as an RRC message to an MN (e.g. when a switch to SUL may be associated with an SN). (It is obvious that mobility for SUL for Cell switch is associated with SN independent of Master Cell or MN the first Cell)). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of SUL mobility in DC of FREDA to the technique of selecting an uplink carrier among the NUL carrier and the SUL carrier based on a measured SSB quality for a random-access procedure of the cell of CIRIK in order to take the advantage of a method providing for improved quality to meet service (QoS) requirements, such as differing throughput requirements, latency requirements, error tolerance requirements, reliability requirements, data throughput requirements and mobility requirements (FREDA: [0028, 0158, 0223]). Regarding claim 6, CIRIK, in view of FREDA, teaches the method of claim 5. CIRIK does not explicitly disclose where the mobility determinations correspond to at least one of: a cell-change, a cell-switch, a beam-change, or a beam-switch. FREDA teaches where the mobility determinations correspond to at least one of: a cell-change, a cell-switch, a beam-change, or a beam-switch ( See FREDA [0156, 0158] cited above for Claim 5). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of SUL mobility in DC of FREDA to the technique of selecting an uplink carrier among the NUL carrier and the SUL carrier based on a measured SSB quality for a random-access procedure of the cell of CIRIK in order to take the advantage of a method providing for improved quality to meet service (QoS) requirements, such as differing throughput requirements, latency requirements, error tolerance requirements, reliability requirements, data throughput requirements and mobility requirements (FREDA: [0028, 0158, 0223]). Regarding claim 13, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 5. Regarding claim 14, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 6. Claims 8 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cirik et al. (US 20220022250 A1, of IDS, hereinafter ‘CIRIK’) in view of Sato et al. (US 20210068147 A1, hereinafter ‘SATO’). Regarding claim 8, CIRIK teaches the method of claim 1, deactivation of the at least one of: the first cell, or the third cell ( [0194] The base station may transmit one or more MAC CEs indicating activation and/or deactivation of the CSI transmission on the one or more cells. In an example, the one or more processes may comprise activation or deactivation of one or more secondary cells. In an example, the base station may transmit a MA CE indicating activation or deactivation of one or more secondary cells). CIRIK does not explicitly disclose wherein upon deactivation of the at least one of: the first cell, or the third cell, respectively, the method further comprises at least one of: deactivating the secondary uplink on the second cell, disabling the scheduling of the secondary uplink on the second cell, or switching a monitoring of the downlink reference signals from the second cell in association with the secondary uplink to at least one of: a cell within a band, a band set, or a frequency range (FR) where the secondary uplink is configured, a cell within a timing advance group (TAG) where the secondary uplink is configured, a cell based on a cell index, or a cell based on a rule established by an implementation of the apparatus. In analogous art, SATO teaches wherein upon deactivation of the at least one of: the first cell, or the third cell ( Fig. 5 Message 505, [0039] Subsequently, a SCell Activation/Deactivation MAC CE 505 indicating deactivation of the serving cell (SCell) is transmitted from the base station apparatus to the mobile station apparatus ….), respectively, the method further comprises at least one of: deactivating the secondary uplink on the second cell, disabling the scheduling of the secondary uplink on the second cell ( Fig. 5 State 555 Grant Free State of SUL Carrier Suspended, [0039] Subsequently, a SCell Activation/Deactivation MAC CE 505 indicating deactivation of the serving cell (SCell) is transmitted from the base station apparatus to the mobile station apparatus. The mobile station apparatus that has received the SCell Activation/Deactivation MAC CE 505 suspends the configured uplink grant of GF for the SUL carrier (555)), or switching a monitoring of the downlink reference signals from the second cell in association with the secondary uplink to at least one of: a cell within a band, a band set, or a frequency range (FR) where the secondary uplink is configured, a cell within a timing advance group (TAG) where the secondary uplink is configured, a cell based on a cell index, or a cell based on a rule established by an implementation of the apparatus. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to take the technique of Supplementary Uplink (SUL) operation of SATO to the technique of selecting an uplink carrier among the NUL carrier and the SUL carrier based on a measured SSB quality for a random-access procedure of the cell of CIRIK in order to take the advantage of a method providing for control of uplink transmission to prevent transmissions on normal uplink and a SUL in a radio resource (slot) at the same time enabling communication to be performed normally even in a case that multiple configured uplink grants are configured in a single serving cell while servicing larger coverage area with SUL when normal uplink carrier has narrower coverage area (SATO: [0004, 0007-0008]). Regarding claim 16, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 8. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Xu et al. (US 20240107576 A1), describing Position Of A Channel Occupancy Time Parameter In A Downlink Control Channel Lee et al. (US 20230345380 A1), describing METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING/RECEIVING SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING SAME Lee et al. (US 20230345380 A1), describing Uplink Carrier Determination For Random Access Procedure Cirik et al. (US 20230180032 A1), describing Transmit Power Determination For Uplink Transmissions Ghanbarinejad et al. (US 20230080162 A1), describing POWER CONTROL USING AT LEAST ONE POWER CONTROL PARAMETER Xu et al. (US 20240178959 A1), describing Beam Management Procedures For Wireless Networks Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAH M RAHMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8951. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30AM-5:30PM PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, UN C CHO can be reached at 571-272-7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAH M RAHMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 31, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598016
Communication Link Initiation Method and Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593267
RADIO WAVE MAP GENERATOR DEVICE, RADIO WAVE MAP PROVIDER DEVICE, AND RADIO WAVE MAP ACQUIRING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587215
RADIO ACCESS TECHNOLOGY (RAT) SPECTRUM TRANSLATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574945
SWITCHING FROM AN ACTIVE BANDWIDTH PART TO A DEFAULT BANDWIDTH PART
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574101
LOCATION DEPENDENT RELAY NODE CONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+26.4%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 461 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month