Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/240,564

METHODS TO REDUCE MEASURE CURRENT SETTLING TIME IN SMU

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 31, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, HIEU P
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
1123 granted / 1220 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1245
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1220 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on 08/31/2023 has been considered and placed in the application file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chow et al. (U.S. 6,828,775). Regarding claim 1, Chow et al. (hereinafter, Ref~775) discloses (please see Fig. 3 and related text for details) a circuit (300 of Fig. 3), comprising: an amplifier (310/312/314 of Fig. 3), including: a voltage input circuit (310 of Fig. 3) having a first input (non-inverting terminal of 310 of Fig. 3), a second input (inverting terminal of 310 of Fig. 3), a first output (disposed at gate of 312 of Fig. 3), and a second output (disposed at the gate of 314 of Fig. 3) as seen; an output driver (312/314 of Fig. 3) having a first input (gate of 312 of Fig. 3) coupled to the first output of the voltage input circuit, a second input (gate of 314 of Fig. 3) coupled to the second output of the voltage input circuit, a feedback input (e.g. see input from 350 provided for FORCE CURRENT path as seen from Fig. 3), and an output (320 of Fig. 3); a first feedback circuit (e.g. centered by circuit 340 of Fig.3) having a first terminal (e.g., non-inverting terminal or inverting terminal of 340 of Fig. 3) coupled to the output of the output driver, and a second terminal (output terminal of 340 of Fig. 3) coupled (via resistor 318 of Fig. 3) to the second input of the voltage input circuit; a sensing resistor (330 of Fig. 3) having a first terminal (disposed to the left of 330 of Fig. 3) coupled to the output of the output driver, and a second terminal (disposed to the right of 330 of Fig. 3); and a first switch (350 of Fig. 3 can be read as the claimed switch OR at least it is functionally equivalent to it) having a first terminal (used by FORCE CURRENT TERMINAL of Fig. 3) coupled to the second terminal of the sensing resistor, and a second terminal (disposed between 350 and 318 of Fig. 3) coupled to the feedback input of the output driver, meeting claim 1. Regarding claim 12, Ref~775 discloses the circuit of claim 1, wherein the first feedback circuit includes a current sensing circuit (circuit 340 of Fig. 3 ) having a first input coupled to the first terminal of the sensing resistor, a second input coupled to the second terminal of the sensing resistor, and an output (345 of Fig. 3) coupled to the second input of the voltage input circuit as seen, meeting claim 12. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-11 and 13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claims 14-17 are allowed over the prior art of record. The prior art of record, considered individually or in combination, fails to fairly teach or suggest the claimed circuit comprising, among other limitations and unobvious limitations of “a first current generator having an input coupled to a first feedback terminal of the output driver, and an output; a first voltage generator having an input coupled to the output of the first current generator, and an output; and a first gate driver having a first input coupled to the output of the first voltage generator, a second input coupled to a second feedback terminal of the output driver, and an output coupled to the third input of the output driver” structurally and functionally interconnected with other limitations in the manner as cited in the claim(s). Claims 18-20 are allowed over the prior art of record. The prior art of record, considered individually or in combination, fails to fairly teach or suggest the claimed circuit comprising, among other limitations and unobvious limitations of “wherein the first feedback circuit includes a sensing resistor having a first terminal coupled to the first terminal of the first feedback circuit, and a second terminal; a first switch having a first terminal coupled to the first terminal of the sensing resistor, and a second terminal coupled to the feedback input of the force amplifier; and a second switch having a first terminal coupled to the second terminal of the sensing resistor, and a second terminal coupled to the feedback input of the force amplifier” structurally and functionally interconnected with other limitations in the manner as cited in the claim(s). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HIEU P NGUYEN whose telephone number is 571-272-8577. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8:30AM-6:00PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren Baltzell can be reached on 571-272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 703-872-9306. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /HIEU P NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 31, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597899
SWITCHING AMPLIFIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597898
HIGH-FREQUENCY CIRCUIT AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597891
CASCODED HIGH-VOLTAGE AMPLIFIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587147
AMPLIFYING CIRCUIT AND CHARGING METHOD WHICH CAN IMPROVE ABNORMAL SOUND
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587139
ENHANCED CURRENT MIRROR FOR MULTIPLE SUPPLY VOLTAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+5.5%)
1y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1220 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month