Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/240,740

SILL LEVELING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 18, 2025
Examiner
WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE
Art Unit
3635
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Goldbrecht LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
675 granted / 918 resolved
+21.5% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
68 currently pending
Career history
986
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
44.3%
+4.3% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
30.4%
-9.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 918 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-3, 5-8 are pending. Claim 4 is cancelled. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/5/26 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-6, 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hildreth (US 11,746,587) in view of Johnson et al (“Johnson”) (US 3,869,839). Re claim 1, Hildreth discloses a sill leveling device (10/12, being capable of leveling a sill, as this is directed to the intended use) securing a door or window frame member (20) to a substructure (28), comprising: an adjuster plate (74) having a female threaded through hole (which receives 26) therein and configured to be secured (Fig. 10) to the door or window frame member (20); an adjustment screw (26) for threadedly engaging (Fig. 10) the female threaded through hole (of 74, which receives 26) of the adjuster plate (74), the adjustment screw (74) having a through hole (32) therein; and a locking screw (34) for securing (Fig. 10) the adjuster plate (74) to the substructure (28), the locking screw (34) passing through (Fig. 10) the through hole (32) of the adjustment screw (26) and being screwed to (Fig. 10) the substructure (28), wherein a distance (Claim 1) between the door or window frame member (20) and the substructure (28) is adjusted (Claim 1) by rotatably adjusting (Col 4 lines 11-24) the adjustment screw (26) with a distal end thereof (Fig. 10, left end of 26) abutted against (Fig. 10) the substructure (28), but fails to disclose a thermal breaker disposed between the adjuster plate and the door or window frame member. However, Johnson discloses a thermal breaker (36; Col 2 lines 56-61 disclosing foam plastic) disposed between the adjuster plate (24) and the door or window frame member (21). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the sill leveling device of Hildreth with a thermal breaker disposed between the adjuster plate and the door or window frame member as disclosed by Johnson in order to add resilience such that upon adjustment, contacting features do not wear against each other, extending the life of the device. Re claim 2, Hildreth as modified discloses the sill leveling device of claim 1, wherein the female threaded through hole (which receives 26) in the adjuster plate (74) is axially aligned with (Fig. 10) the through hole (32) in the adjustment screw (26) Re claim 3, Hildreth as modified discloses the sill leveling device of claim 1, wherein the adjuster plate (74) includes a plate portion (see examiner comments) and a protruding portion (see examiner comments), the protruding portion (see examiner comments) being received in (Fig. 10) the door or window frame member (20). Re claim 5, Hildreth as modified discloses a sill leveling assembly (Fig. 1), comprising a plurality of sill leveling devices (12, see Fig. 11) of claim 1 (see above) spaced along a length (Fig. 11) of the door or window frame member (28). Re claim 6, Hildreth as modified discloses a sill leveling assembly (Fig. 1), comprising a plurality of sill leveling devices (12) of claim 1 (see above) and a plurality of door or window frame members (20) located adjacent each other (Fig. 11), the sill leveling devices (12) respectively being spaced along a length (Fig. 11) of two of the door or window frame members (jambs 20), but fails to disclose the sill leveling devices spaced along a length of each of the plurality of door or window frame members (in other words, a plurality of 12 are not disposed on top element 20). However, it would have been obvious one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the leveling assembly of Hildreth to have the sill leveling devices spaced along a length of each of the plurality of door or window frame members (in other words, multiple also on top 20) in order to increase the range of adjustment and leveling through use of additional shims on the header. In addition, it has been held that the duplication of parts is considered within the level of ordinary skill in the art absent production of a new or unexpected result. In re Harza, 274 F.2d 669. Re claim 8, Hildreth as modified discloses the sill leveling device according to claim 1, wherein the adjuster plate (74) is secured external to (Fig. 10, at the protruding part being external thereto) the door or window frame member (20). Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hildreth (US 11,746,587) in view of Johnson et al (“Johnson”) (US 3,869,839) and Johansson (US 3,667,338). Re claim 7, Hildreth as modified discloses the sill leveling device according to claim 3, but fails to disclose wherein an entirety of the protruding portion is within an opening in the door or window frame member. However, Johansson discloses wherein an entirety of the protruding portion (5) is within an opening (within 10) in the door or window frame member (10). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the sill leveling device of Hildreth wherein an entirety of the protruding portion is within an opening in the door or window frame member as disclosed by Johannson in order to allow for flush mounting on either side of the frame member (as the protruding portion would no longer protrude outward from the frame member), or to reduce the size/material of the adjuster plate (saving costs), as all portions would no longer be disposed / required exterior to the frame member. Examiner Comments PNG media_image1.png 769 648 media_image1.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Claim Rejections 35 USC 103: Applicant’s arguments with respect to all claims have been considered but are moot as they do not apply to any of the combination of references in the above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KYLE WALRAED-SULLIVAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8838. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Mattei can be reached at (571)270-3238. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. KYLE WALRAED-SULLIVAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 3635 /KYLE J. WALRAED-SULLIVAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 18, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 10, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 02, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595666
PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594442
FALL RESTRAINT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595662
WALL PANEL CLIP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595657
Formwork Panel of a Formwork System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577791
System of structural support framework for elevated flooring
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.8%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 918 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month