Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/240,766

PORTABLE MEDICAL TREATMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 31, 2023
Priority
Mar 19, 2014 — provisional 61/955,642 +3 more
Examiner
ANDERSON, CATHARINE L
Art Unit
3781
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Vaporox Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
712 granted / 1088 resolved
-4.6% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1123
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
75.7%
+35.7% vs TC avg
§102
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1088 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 18-37 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pelkus (8,241,258) in view of Bernstein (2010/0150991). With respect to claim 18, Pelkus discloses a method for treating a wound comprising covering the wound with a treatment chamber 100, as shown in figures 3A and 3B, surrounding the wound in the treatment chamber with a vapor containing water and/or medicament, as disclosed in column 8, lines 14-17, and surrounding the wound with an O2-enriched gas, as disclosed in column 8, lines 27-40, without increasing the pressure around the wound to 22 mm Hg, as disclosed in column 11, lines 25-26. The vapor and gas are prepared in a portable variable hyperoxia treatment apparatus, as shown in figure 1, having a housing 10 containing first, second, and third sealable chambers. The first chamber houses an energy source 220, as shown in figure 3A and disclosed in column 8, lines 56-60. The second chamber 400 contains water and medicament, as shown in figure 8B and disclosed in column 4, lines 55-57. A third chamber contains a gas, as disclosed in column 8, lines 31-33. A control circuit 130 is powered by the energy source, as disclosed in column 8, lines 56-60. A humidifier 400 is in contact with the water and medicament, as disclosed in column 4, lines 55-57. A flow control regulator 133 is connected to the control circuit 130 for dispensing gas from the gas containing cartridge, as disclosed in column 5, lines 48-57. A storage port 71 above is the humidifier for humidified vapor and medicament, as shown in figure 1. A main valve 50 is controlled by the control circuit 130 and is connected to the storage port 70 and the flow control regulator, as shown in figure 1 and disclosed in column 5, 48-54. An exit port 70 is connected to the main valve 50 for dispensing humidified vapor and medicament, as shown in figure 1. A sealable cap 30 covers the chambers, as shown in figure 1. Pelkus discloses all aspects of the claimed invention with the exception of a programmable control circuit. Pelkus discloses in column 6, line 64, to column 7, line 28, that the system can run different regimens for each particular patient, and an operator can select different options, but remains silent as to the control circuit being programmable. Bernstein discloses a method for treating a wound with a treatment chamber, as shown in figure 1, and teaches using a programmable control circuit to allow control of application of treatment, as disclosed in paragraph [0127]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the control circuit of Pelkus programmable, as taught by Bernstein, to achieve the predicable result of allowing a user control the application of treatment by inputting specific regimes. With respect to claims 19-22, the wound is a surgical incision, chronic lesion, post-surgical infection, gangrenous lesion, decubitus ulcer, amputation, skin graft, burn, or frostbite, as disclosed in column 1, lines 21-30. With respect to claim 23, the medicament is an antibiotic, as disclosed in column 8, lines 14-17. With respect to claims 24-25, the antibiotic is betadine, isopropyl alcohol, bacitracin, hydrogen peroxide, or ionic silver, as disclosed in column 14, lines 1-4. With respect to claim 26, the wound is the result of an infection, as disclosed in column 1, lines 21-25. With respect to claims 27-28, modified Pelkus discloses all aspects of the claimed invention with the exception of the wound being Propionibacterium acne. Pelkus discloses in column 1, lines 21-30, that the method can be used to treat an array of infections but remains silent as to treating acne. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention for the wound in the method of Pelkus to be Propionibacterium acne to achieve the predictable result of applying a known technique to a similar method. With respect to claims 29 and 32, modified Pelkus discloses all aspects of the claimed invention with the exception of the medicament being benzoyl peroxide, salicylic acid, glycolic acid, sulfur or azelaic acid, miconazole, clotrimazole, terbinafine, tolnaftate, or butenafine. Pelkus discloses in column 14, lines 4-7, that other FDA approved antibacterials, antibiotics, antiseptics, and antimicrobial solutions may be used. The claimed medicaments are all well-known and commercially-available antibacterials, antibiotics, antiseptics, or antimicrobial solutions. It would therefore have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention for the medicament of Pelkus to be benzoyl peroxide, salicylic acid, glycolic acid, sulfur or azelaic acid, miconazole, clotrimazole, terbinafine, tolnaftate, or butenafine, to achieve the predictable result of using a known, commercial-available, PDA approved solution for treatment of wounds. With respect to claims 30-31, modified Pelkus discloses all aspects of the claimed invention with the exception of the wound being athlete’s foot or an infection caused by Trichophyton. Pelkus discloses in column 1, lines 21-30, that the method can be used to treat an array of infections but remains silent as to treating acne. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention for the wound in the method of Pelkus to be athlete’s foot or an infection caused by Trichophyton to achieve the predictable result of applying a known technique to a similar method. With respect to claim 33, the O2-encirched gas is substantially pure O2, as disclosed in column 8, lines 35-36. With respect to claims 34-37, the steps (b) and (c) are performed one or more times in a single treatment for about 15 minutes, as disclosed in column 8, lines 40-44. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Patents 7,527,603; 8,128,672; 8,900,208; and 2011/0040239 disclose methods of treating wounds. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LYNNE ANDERSON whose telephone number is (571)272-4932. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sarah Al-Hashimi can be reached at 571-272-7159. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CATHARINE L ANDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3781
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 31, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629294
ABSORBENT ARTICLE
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622817
DISPOSABLE HYGIENE ARTICLE WITH IMPROVED FIT
2y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616615
SENSING DEVICE FOR A NAPPY
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611339
ABSORBENT INSERT
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12611340
ABSORBENT INSERT
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+21.5%)
3y 9m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1088 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month