Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/242,117

INDUCTION BOARD FOR ADHERED ROOFING SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 05, 2023
Examiner
TAVARES-CROCKETT, ULA CORINNA
Art Unit
1729
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Amrize Technology Switzerland LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
39%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
63%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 39% of cases
39%
Career Allow Rate
62 granted / 159 resolved
-26.0% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
170
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.4%
+12.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 159 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The previously set forth 112, 2nd paragraph rejection has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claim(s) 1-4, 7-10, and 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR 20170042437 (hereinafter KR ‘437) in view of Brown et al. (US 10814582). KR ‘437 discloses a strength-reinforced hybrid insulation material, and more particularly, to a heat-resistant hybrid insulation material that improves heat insulation, incombustibility, and sound absorption to be used as a material for various apparatuses, buildings, ducts, sound absorption and sound insulating materials. Referring to FIG. 1, the illustrated strength-enhancing hybrid insulation 10 includes a polymer foam layer 11, a strength-enhancing layer 12 of flexural strength reinforcement, and a barrier layer 13. The polymer foam layer can be a polyisocyanurate foam. The strength reinforcing material can be a metal net of a stainless-steel material. An adhesive layer is used to bond the layer to the metal plate. The adhesives can be high-temperature melting adhesives (0030). PNG media_image1.png 93 283 media_image1.png Greyscale KR ‘437 disclose the claimed invention except for the newly added limitations of “wherein the adhesive is configured to activate as a result of a heating the metal wire to a temperature equal to or greater than the activation temperature of the adhesive, which is adapted to adhere the base material with a membrane.” Brown et al. (US 10814582) disclose decorative and structural panels, and, more specifically, to a flexible veneer panel with a metal mesh layer (col 1, ln 6-8). The panel may comprise a wood veneer, a metal mesh, a backing layer, and a thermoset adhesive bonding the veneer to the metal mesh and the backing layer (col 1, ln 25-28). In various embodiments, and in response to the increased temperature and pressure, adhesive material 104 may penetrate (in the y-direction) into fibers of the wood used for face veneer 102 as well as into metal mesh 106. Metal mesh 106 and face veneer 102 may press together and contact one another or have a thin layer of adhesive remaining between one another. Similarly, in response to the increased temperature and pressure, adhesive material 108 may penetrate into the material (e.g., wood) used for backing layer 110 as well as into metal mesh 106. Metal mesh 106 and backing layer 110 may press together and contact one another or have a thin layer of adhesive remaining between one another. Adhesive material 104 and adhesive material 108 may then thermoset and initiate cross-linking bonds. Adhesive material that has invaded into face veneer 102, metal mesh 106, and backing layer 110 may provide a strong adhesion and resist delamination (col 4, ln 41-57). It would have been obvious to having ordinary skill in the art to have used Brown’s disclosure of increasing temperature to melt the adhesive in the insulation material of KR ‘437 motivated by the desire to have an insulation that has strong adhesion and increased resistance to delamination. Claims 1-5 and 7-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ciuperca (US 2014/0272302) in view of Brown et al. (US 10814582). Ciuperca discloses an architectural decorative surface finish on a substrate, especially an insulating foam panel (0002). Ciuperca further discloses that the exterior finish system incorporates recycled or repurposed materials (0004). The substrate 10 can be any desired size, shape or thickness, but preferably is in the shape of a rectangular panel. The substrate 10 can be concrete, gypsum board, cement board, concrete block, wood, plywood, but is preferably made from closed cell polymeric foam, such as polyisocyanurate and polyurethane (0015). The foam substrate 10 optionally has a layer of reinforcing material 12 on one primary surface 14 thereof. Optionally, the other primary surface 16 of the foam substrate 10 is preferably attached to a secondary substrate 18 such as any sheathing material including but not limited to, plywood, gypsum board, cement board and the like. The foam substrate 10 can be attached to the primary substrate 14 by any means know in the art (0017), such as adhesives (0017). The layer of reinforcing material can be made of meshes made from metal (0018). The layer of reinforcing material 12 can be adhered to the first primary surface 14 of the foam substrate 10 by a conventional adhesive that is compatible with the material from which the foam substrate is made (0019). PNG media_image2.png 374 632 media_image2.png Greyscale Ciuperca et al. disclose the claimed invention except for the newly added limitations of “wherein the adhesive is configured to activate as a result of a heating the metal wire to a temperature equal to or greater than the activation temperature of the adhesive, which is adapted to adhere the base material with a membrane.” Brown et al. disclose decorative and structural panels, and, more specifically, to a flexible veneer panel with a metal mesh layer (col 1, ln 6-8). The panel may comprise a wood veneer, a metal mesh, a backing layer, and a thermoset adhesive bonding the veneer to the metal mesh and the backing layer (col 1, ln 25-28). In various embodiments, and in response to the increased temperature and pressure, adhesive material 104 may penetrate (in the y-direction) into fibers of the wood used for face veneer 102 as well as into metal mesh 106. Metal mesh 106 and face veneer 102 may press together and contact one another or have a thin layer of adhesive remaining between one another. Similarly, in response to the increased temperature and pressure, adhesive material 108 may penetrate into the material (e.g., wood) used for backing layer 110 as well as into metal mesh 106. Metal mesh 106 and backing layer 110 may press together and contact one another or have a thin layer of adhesive remaining between one another. Adhesive material 104 and adhesive material 108 may then thermoset and initiate cross-linking bonds. Adhesive material that has invaded into face veneer 102, metal mesh 106, and backing layer 110 may provide a strong adhesion and resist delamination (col 4, ln 41-57). It would have been obvious to having ordinary skill in the art to have used Brown’s disclosure of increasing temperature to melt the adhesive in the insulating panel of Ciuperca in the motivated by the desire to have a panel that has strong adhesion and increased resistance to delamination. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ciuperca (US 2014/0272302) and Brown et al. (US 10814582) and further in view of Propst (US 2014/0150362). The combination of Ciuperca and Brown et al. disclose the claimed invention except for the teaching that the coverboard comprises recycled material. Propst (US 2014/0150362) discloses a building panel, specifically roof panels, that is used to form a structure. The use of environmentally friendly, insulating, lightweight block materials for use as the walls, roofs, floors and other structures in buildings is increasing in popularity. The blocks of material are being used to replace concrete blocks and insulated wood and stucco walls. These blocks are structural elements which provide insulation properties and a shaped mass which defines the shape of the structure to be built. Expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam blocks are a popular material, but other materials such as straw, plastic, and recycled elements are also being used to create these insulating structural blocks. These new building materials use less wood, decrease construction waste, often use recycled materials, and create a building which is more energy efficient than standard wood frame and plaster construction buildings (0079). Core 158 can be formed of any material or materials that provide the necessary building-shaped elements and that accepts coating 160 to create building panel 112 according to the invention. Core 158 can be formed of wood, metal, recycled materials, straw, concrete blocks, plastic, or any other material or combination of materials (0086). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to have used Propst’s teaching of a recycled material in the core substrate of Ciuperca motivated by the desire to create an insulating foam panel that has decreased construction waste and more energy efficient. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ULA CORINNA RUDDOCK whose telephone number is (571)272-1481. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8-4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Srilakshmi K Kumar can be reached at 571-272-7769. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ULA C RUDDOCK/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1729 /ULA C RUDDOCK/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 05, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 05, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586784
SILICON ANODES WITH WATER-SOLUBLE MALEIC ANHYDRIDE-, AND/OR MALEIC ACID-CONTAINING POLYMERS/COPOLYMERS, DERIVATIVES, AND/OR COMBINATIONS (WITH OR WITHOUT ADDITIVES) AS BINDERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12565025
NONWOVEN LAMINATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12540095
METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PREFORM FOR AN ANTI-RESONANT HOLLOW-CORE FIBER HAVING NESTED CAPILLARIES; PREFORM AND INTERMEDIATE PRODUCT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12509819
MICRO-NANO STRUCTURE-BASED SUPER-HYDROPHOBIC FABRIC AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12438191
ELECTROLYTE ADDITIVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
39%
Grant Probability
63%
With Interview (+23.6%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 159 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month