Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/243,445

METHOD FOR PREPARING 1,1,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 07, 2023
Priority
Mar 09, 2021 — JP 2021-036855 +1 more
Examiner
PARSA, JAFAR F
Art Unit
1692
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Daikin Industries Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1092 granted / 1251 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1267
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1251 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant's arguments filed on May 22, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The Applicant’s argument that Tomiyori et al. cannot render the present claim obvious because it teaches a reaction in the “opposite” direction is unpersuasive. In US 2018/0037524 A1 (Tomiyori) paragraph [0042] explicitly defines the chemical reaction using a reversible equilibrium operator: C(R1R2X1) – C(R3R4X2) ⇌ C(R1R2) = C(R3R4) This equilibrium explicitly encompasses both the forward reaction (dehalogenation/dehydrofluorination) and the reverse reduction reaction (hydrogenation/hydrofluorination). A reversible reaction arrow (⇌) inherently teaches that the chemical reaction proceeds in both directions simultaneously depending on reaction conditions. By explicitly disclosing the equilibrium between the haloalkane (1,1,2-trifluoroethane or HFC-143) and the haloalkene(1,1,2-trifluoroethylene or HFO-1123), Tomiyori teaches both: -The consumption of HFC-143 to form HFO-1123 (forward direction). -The reduction/addition reaction of HFO-1123 with a reducing agent (H2) to yield HFC-143(reverse direction). Setting R1=H, R2=F, R3=F, R4=F, and X1=X2=H converts the structural formula directly into the claimed reduction of 1,1,2-trifluoroethylene into 1,1,2-trifluoroethane. Paragraph [0088]and claim 12 of Tomiyori explicitly teach contacting these precise gaseous reactants with a solid-phase catalyst inside a reactor. Tomiyori discloses an operating temperature of 200C or more, the Applicant’s claimed range of 200 to 300C falls entirely within and directly overlaps with the prior art teaching. A person having ordinary skill in the art optimizing a reversible equilibrium reaction would routinely look to this temperature window to favor the desired reduction product. Regarding claim 4, Tomiyori explicitly teaches step 1 (the reversible conversion yielding HFC-143). Step 2 is merely the subsequent dehydrofluorination of that identical intermediate to obtain 1,2-difluoroethylene. Because Tomiyori establishes the foundational equilibrium parameters and discloses the relevant chemical intermediates within the same reactor configuration, it would be prima facie obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to sequence these structural transformations to achieve the final alkenes. The examiner maintains the rejection. The prior art discloses a reversible equilibrium reaction (⇌) inherently discloses both the forward and reverse reaction pathways, thereby rendering the claimed reduction method obvious despite the Applicant’s focus on the opposite reaction direction. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAFAR F PARSA whose telephone number is (571)272-0643. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10:00 AM-6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Scarlett Goon can be reached at 571-270-5241. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAFAR F PARSA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1692
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 07, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 22, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741918
METHOD FOR STORING FLUOROBUTENE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742045
METHOD FOR PRODUCING FLUORINE-CONTAINING COMPOUND AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SURFACE TREATMENT AGENT
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741980
METHOD FOR PREPARING 4-(HYDROXYMETHYLPHOSPHINYL)-2-OXOBUTANOIC ACID
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735373
METHOD FOR TREATING A HEAVY BYPRODUCT STREAM FROM CHLORINATED PROPANE PRODUCTION
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12703674
PROCESSES FOR PRODUCING CARBOXYLIC ACIDS OR ALKYL ESTERS
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+8.8%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1251 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month